Characteristics of Mesozoic-Cenozoic structural deformation in the Sarekebayi basin, Xinjiang, and its prospecting significance

LIU Zi; FANG Weixuan; BU Peng; TANG Zhixin; CAO Jingwei; DU Yulong; JIA Runxing

2020 Vol. 39, No. 11

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2020 > 39(11): 1858-1872

Next Article Previous Article

LIU Zi, FANG Weixuan, BU Peng, TANG Zhixin, CAO Jingwei, DU Yulong, JIA Runxing. Characteristics of Mesozoic-Cenozoic structural deformation in the Sarekebayi basin, Xinjiang, and its prospecting significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2020, 39(11): 1858-1872.

Citation:

LIU Zi, FANG Weixuan, BU Peng, TANG Zhixin, CAO Jingwei, DU Yulong, JIA Runxing. Characteristics of Mesozoic-Cenozoic structural deformation in the Sarekebayi basin, Xinjiang, and its prospecting significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2020, 39(11): 1858-1872.

Characteristics of Mesozoic-Cenozoic structural deformation in the Sarekebayi basin, Xinjiang, and its prospecting significance

1.
Beijing Institute of Geology for Mineral Resources, Beijing 100012, China
2.
Hongshi Mining Co., Ltd. of Hami, Hami 839000, Xinjiang, China
3.
China Non-ferrous Metals Resource Geological Survey, Beijing 100012, China
4.
South Institute of China Non-ferrous Metals Resource Geological Survey, Changsha 410001, Hunan, China

More Information

Corresponding author: FANG Weixuan, 569026971@qq.com

Received Date: 20 March 2020

Revised Date: 17 June 2020

Publish Date: 25 November 2020

Abstract

Abstract

Based on field geological survey and structural geological survey, the authors systematically analyzed the geometry, kinematics and dynamics characteristics of the faults and folds which are at the edge and in the interior of the Sarekebayi basin, and reconstructed the evolution process of the basin so as to explore the ore-controlling rules and promote prospecting prediction at the depth. The results are as follows: ① The basin has experienced eight stages of structural evolution. i.e., the development of pull-apart basin (J₁-J₂), the tectonic uplift and denudation (J₂-J₃), the subsidence (J₃), the tectonic uplift and denudation (J₃-K₁), the subsidence (K₁), the tectonic uplift and denudation (K₁-E), the compressive-shear structural deformation (N1), and the compressive structural deformation (N₂-Q). There existed vertical movement of subsidence and uplift in the first six stages (J₁-E) and horizontal movement of compression in the last two stages (N-Q). ② There are two stages of superimposed compressive structural deformation in the basin. In the early stage, the N(W)W-S(E)E-trending open fold with small scale was formed. In the late stage, a series of NEE-SWW trending folds and faults were formed, which showed that southern boundary fault and northern boundary fault on the margin of the basin were thrusting towards the basin, and the associated folds formed in the footwall near the faults (NF, SF) tended to be closed tightly, while the secondary folds in the core of compound syncline (Sf) far away from the faults (NF, SF) were mostly open and wide. ③ Structural ore-control of the basin can be divided into two stages. In the mineralization stage (J₁-K₁), the normal fault, reverse fault and associated fault-joint-crack formed by basin subsidence and uplift were the important ore-passing structures, the bedding fissures developed in the sandy conglomerate layer of Kuzigongsu Formation of Upper Jurassic were the important ore-storage structures, and the intersectional parts of ore-passing structures and ore storage structures were the best location for ore fluid enrichment and mineralization. In the post mineralization stage, the compressive structural deformation formed by the late (N₂-Q) NNW-SSE regional compression obviously controlled the spatial distribution of the orebody, resulting in the involvement of the orebody in the fold deformation as well as it being cut through or staggered by the fault-crack zone. ④ In the east zone of the 30th prospecting line, Cu or Zn orebodies or mineralization bodies probably occurred in the second lithologic section of Kuzigongsu Formation, which was concealed in the depth of southern ore zone, and it has great potential for prospecting.
- Sarekebayi basin /
- Mesozoic-Cenozoic /
- copper deposit /
- structural deformation /
- ore-controlling mechanisms /
- Xinjiang

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	方维萱, 王磊, 贾润幸.塔西地区中-新生代盆-山-原镶嵌构造区:砂砾岩型铜铅锌-天青石-铀-煤成矿系统[J].地球科学与环境学报, 2018, 40(6):663-705. Google Scholar
[2]	方维萱, 王磊, 郭玉乾, 等.新疆萨热克巴依盆内构造样式及对萨热克大型砂砾岩型铜矿床控制规律[J].地学前缘, 2018, 25(3):240-259. Google Scholar
[3]	杜玉龙, 方维萱, 鲁佳.新疆萨热克辉长辉绿岩类成岩温度-压力-氧逸度特征与成岩作用演化趋势[J].岩石学报, 2020, 43(3):484-508. Google Scholar
[4]	高珍权, 方维萱, 王伟, 等.沟系土壤测量在新疆乌恰县萨热克铜矿勘查中的应用效果[J].矿产与地质, 2005, 19(5):669-673. Google Scholar
[5]	胡庆雯, 刘宏林.新疆乌恰县萨热克砂岩铜矿床地质特征与找矿前景[J].矿产与地质, 2008, 22(2):131-134. Google Scholar
[6]	梁晓鹰.地球化学勘查在新疆萨热克铜矿的应用效果[J].新疆有色金属, 2008, 19(5):5-8. Google Scholar
[7]	刘增仁, 巴特, 田培仁, 等.新疆乌恰县萨热克砂砾岩型铜矿成矿地质特征与找矿潜力分析[J].西北地质, 2010, 43(增刊):12-16. Google Scholar
[8]	胡建辉, 吉蕴生, 曾志钢, 等.新疆萨热克铜矿床地球化学异常评价研究[J].矿产勘查, 2014, 5(2):281-292. Google Scholar
[9]	王伟, 李文渊, 高满新, 等.塔里木陆块西北缘萨热克砂岩型铜矿床构造-流体演化对成矿的制约[J].地质通报, 2018, 37(7):1315-1324. Google Scholar
[10]	祝新友, 王京彬, 王玉杰, 等.新疆萨热克铜矿——与盆地卤水作用有关的大型矿床[J].矿产勘查, 2011, 2(1):28-35. Google Scholar
[11]	李志丹, 薛春纪, 辛江, 等.新疆乌恰县萨热克铜矿床地质特征及硫、铅同位素地球化学[J].现代地质, 2011, 25(4):720-729. Google Scholar
[12]	张振亮, 冯选洁, 董福辰, 等.西南天山砂砾岩容矿矿床类型及找矿方向[J].西北地质, 2014, 47(3):70-82. Google Scholar
[13]	方维萱, 贾润幸, 王磊, 等.新疆萨热克大型砂砾岩型铜多金属矿床的成矿控制规律[J].矿物学报, 2015, 35(增刊):202-204. Google Scholar
[14]	方维萱, 贾润幸, 郭玉乾, 等.塔西地区富烃类还原性盆地流体与砂砾岩型铜铅锌-铀矿床成矿机制[J].地球科学与环境学报, 2016, 38(6):727-752. Google Scholar
[15]	韩文华, 方维萱, 张贵山, 等.新疆萨热克砂砾岩型铜矿区碎裂岩化相特征[J].地球科学与环境学报, 2017, 39(3):397-405. Google Scholar
[16]	贾润幸, 方维萱, 王磊, 等.新疆萨热克砂砾岩型铜矿床富烃类还原性盆地流体特征[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2017, 41(4):1-13. Google Scholar
[17]	王磊, 方维萱, 鲁佳, 等.新疆乌恰地区萨热克铜矿床储矿构造样式与控矿规律[J].地球科学与环境学报, 2019, 41(1):29-39. Google Scholar
[18]	贾润幸, 方维萱, 李建旭, 等.新疆萨热克铜矿床铼-锇同位素年龄及其地质意义[J].矿床地质, 2018, 37(1):151-162. Google Scholar
[19]	刘宏林, 胡庆雯, 田培仁.关于新疆乌恰盆地中新生代砂岩型铅锌铜铀层次成矿问题浅析[J].矿产与地质, 2010, 24(2):113-119. Google Scholar
[20]	胡望水.塔里木盆地反转构造与油气聚集[J].新疆石油地质, 1995, 16(2):89-95. Google Scholar
[21]	Burtman V S, Skobelev S F, Molnar P.Late Cenozoic slip on the Talas-Ferghana fault, the Tian Shan, central Asia[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1996, 108(8):1004-1021. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<1004:LCSOTT>2.3.CO;2 CrossRef Google Scholar
[22]	罗金海, 车自成, 刘良.喀什凹陷的成因及找油方向[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, 28(5):435-438. Google Scholar
[23]	Sobel E R.Basin analysis of the Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous southwest Tarim basin, northwest China[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1999, 111(5):709-724. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<0709:BAOTJL>2.3.CO;2 CrossRef Google Scholar
[24]	Allen M B, Alsop G I, Zhemchuzhnikov V G.Dome and basin refolding and transpressive inversion along the Karatau Fault System, southern Kazakstan[J].Journal of the Geological Society, 2001, 158(1):83-95. doi: 10.1144/jgs.158.1.83 CrossRef Google Scholar
[25]	Bande A, Sobel E R, Mikolaichuk A, et al.Talas-Fergana Fault Cenozoic timing of deformation and its relation to Pamir indentation[M].Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2015: 1-427. Google Scholar
[26]	Alexeiev D V, Bykadorov V A, Volozh Y A, et al.Kinematic analysis of Jurassic Grabens of Southern Turgai and the role of the Mesozoic Stage in the evolution of the Karatau-Talas-Ferghana Strike-Slip Fault, Southern Kazakhstan and Tian Shan[J].Geotectonics, 2017, 51(2):105-120. doi: 10.1134/S0016852117020029 CrossRef Google Scholar
[27]	Hendrix M S, Graham S A, Carroll A R, et al.Sedimentary record and climatic implications of recurrent deformation in the Tian Shan:Evidence from Mesozoic strata of the north Tarim, south Junggar, and Turpan basins, northwest China[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1992, 104:53-79. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1992)104<0053:SRACIO>2.3.CO;2 CrossRef Google Scholar
[28]	方维萱, 王磊, 王寿成, 等.塔西砂砾岩型铜铅锌矿床成矿规律与找矿预测[M].北京:科学出版社, 2019. Google Scholar
[29]	陆俊吉, 胡煜昭, 江小均, 等.新疆乌恰萨热克铜矿北矿带库孜贡苏沉积相、古流向、物源区及其找矿意义——来自砾石统计分析的证据[J].地质通报, 2016, 35(6):963-970. Google Scholar
[30]	乔欣, 胡煜昭, 江小均, 等.新疆乌恰萨热克含铜盆地上侏罗统库孜贡苏组复合型冲积扇沉积相研究[J].地质通报, 2016, 35(11):1884-1894. Google Scholar
[31]	Zhu D C, Li S M, Cawood P A, et al.Assembly of the Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes in central Tibet by divergent double subduction[J].Lithos, 2016, 245:7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2015.06.023 CrossRef Google Scholar
[32]	Zhu D C, Zhao Z D, Niu Y N, et al.The Lhasa Terrane:record of a microcontinent and its histories of drift and growth[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011, 301:241-255. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.005 CrossRef Google Scholar
[33]	Chen Y, Zhu D C, Zhao Z D, et al.Slab breakoff triggered ca.113 Ma magmatism around Xainza area of the Lhasa Terrane, Tibet[J].Gondwana Research, 2013, 26:449-463. Google Scholar
[34]	季建清, 韩宝福, 朱美妃, 等.西天山托云盆地及周边中新生代岩浆活动的岩石学、地球化学与年代学研究[J].岩石学报, 2006, 22(5):1324-1340. Google Scholar
[35]	王彦斌, 王永, 刘训, 等.南天山托云盆地晚白垩世-早第三纪玄武岩的地球化学特征及成因初探[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2000, 19(2):131-139. Google Scholar
[36]	徐学义, 夏林圻, 夏祖春, 等.西南天山托云地区白垩纪-早第三纪玄武岩地球化学及其成因机制[J].地球化学, 2003, 32(6):551-560. Google Scholar
[37]	黄行凯, 艾世强, 崔乐乐, 等.新疆萨热克铜矿辉绿岩地球化学特征与动力学意义[J].矿物学报, 2017, 37(5):646-652. Google Scholar
[38]	Searle M P, Windley B F, Coward M P, et al.The closing of Tethys and the tectonics of the Himalaya[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1987, 98:678-702. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1987)98<678:TCOTAT>2.0.CO;2 CrossRef Google Scholar
[39]	罗金海, 周新源, 邱斌, 等.塔里木盆地西部中、新生代5次构造事件及其石油地质学意义[J].石油勘探与开发, 2005, 33(1):18-22. Google Scholar
[40]	刘阵, 王鹏, 张洪美, 等.费尔干纳盆地形成演化及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J].新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(1):120-124. Google Scholar
[41]	Rowley D.Age of initiation of collision between India and Asia:A review of stratigraphic data[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1996, 145:1-13. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(96)00201-4 CrossRef Google Scholar
[42]	何登发, 贾承造, 李德生, 等.塔里木多旋回叠合盆地的形成与演化[J].石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(1):64-77. Google Scholar
[43]	曲国胜, 陈杰, 陈新安, 等.西昆仑-帕米尔造山带及其北缘前陆盆地板内变形改造特征[J].地质论评, 1998, 44(4):419-429. Google Scholar
[44]	陈楚铭, 卢华复, 贾东, 等.塔里木盆地晚第三纪-第四纪沉积特征、构造变形与石油地质意义[J].沉积学报, 1998, 16(2):113-123. Google Scholar
[45]	陈杰, 卢演俦, 丁国瑜.塔里木西缘晚新生代造山过程的记录——磨拉石建造及生长地层和生长不整合[J].第四纪研究, 2001, 21(6):528-539. Google Scholar
[46]	金小赤, 王军, 陈炳蔚, 等.新生代西昆仑隆升的地层学和沉积学记录[J].地质学报, 2001, 75(4):459-467. Google Scholar
[47]	苗继军, 贾承造, 侯向辉, 等.塔里木盆地西部喀什地区新生代褶皱冲断带构造解析[J].地质科学, 2007, 42(4):120-132. Google Scholar
[48]	刘志强.萨热克铜矿工程地质调查及岩体稳定性分析[J].中国矿山工程, 2016, 45(2):1-5. Google Scholar