Classification and application effect of structural deformation lithofacies in the orefield

LÜ Guxian; ZHANG Baolin; HU Baoqun; WANG Zongyong; LIU Jianmin; GUO Tao; SHEN Yuke; WEI Changshan; XU Deru; YANG Xingke; JIAO Jiangang; WANG Cuizhi; BI Minfeng; MA Licheng

2020 Vol. 39, No. 11

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2020 > 39(11): 1669-1680

Next Article Previous Article

LÜ Guxian, ZHANG Baolin, HU Baoqun, WANG Zongyong, LIU Jianmin, GUO Tao, SHEN Yuke, WEI Changshan, XU Deru, YANG Xingke, JIAO Jiangang, WANG Cuizhi, BI Minfeng, MA Licheng. Classification and application effect of structural deformation lithofacies in the orefield[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2020, 39(11): 1669-1680.

Citation:

LÜ Guxian, ZHANG Baolin, HU Baoqun, WANG Zongyong, LIU Jianmin, GUO Tao, SHEN Yuke, WEI Changshan, XU Deru, YANG Xingke, JIAO Jiangang, WANG Cuizhi, BI Minfeng, MA Licheng. Classification and application effect of structural deformation lithofacies in the orefield[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2020, 39(11): 1669-1680.

Classification and application effect of structural deformation lithofacies in the orefield

1.
Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics/Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
3.
Institutions of Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
4.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
5.
School of Earth Science, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China
6.
Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
7.
Key Laboratory of Mineralogy and Metallogeny, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China
8.
State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China
9.
School of Earth Science and Resources, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China
10.
School of Zijin Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China
11.
Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China

Received Date: 05 March 2020

Revised Date: 20 June 2020

Publish Date: 25 November 2020

Abstract

Abstract

The orefield is equivalent to the grade V metallogenic belt of geological exploration object. It is necessary to study the geological phenomenon of "structure and construction association" and establish the corresponding concept and field observation method. It is different from the theoretical viewpoints of "sedimentary tectonic lithofacies", "magmatic lithofacies", "metamorphic lithofacies", "geotectonic facies", "tectonic lithofacies" and "tectonic facies". On the basis of long-term orefield structure and deep peripheral ore prospecting practice, the geological concept of "tectonic deformation lithofacies" is proposed in this paper. Tectonic deformation lithofacies is regarded as "a part of lithofacies showing structural deformation", which indicates the part of lithofacies (sedimentary, magmatic and metamorphic geological processes) affected by structure. It is a geological entity containing structural deformation and formation characteristics or structural formation features. Tectonic deformation lithofacies is a geological body closely associated with rock deformation and phase transformation. It can not only reflect the geological environment of diagenesis but also contain the physical and chemical conditions of diagenesis. It is a kind of structural rock unit suitable for observation and analysis of "structure combined construction". According to the types of geological processes, four types of tectonic deformation lithofacies are recognized:sedimentary structural deformation lithofacies, magmatic tectonic deformation lithofacies, metamorphic structural deformation lithofacies and composite structural deformation lithofacies. According to the geological subfacies, 27 types of tectonic deformation lithofacies at the orefield scale are distinguished. The establishment of observation and analysis methods of structural deformation lithofacies in the orefield not only promotes the geological investigation and study of structural combination construction but also lays a foundation for the development of orefield structure to orefield geology. With different precision from 1:1000~1:50000, tectonic deformation lithofacies can be used to investigate geological prospecting problems in the range of tens to hundreds of km², directly serving the deep peripheral prospecting of known deposits. The best way to delineate the target area is to depict the distribution characteristics of mineralized lithofacies zones from the surface and large-scale mapping in the middle section. On the basis of "prospecting on the basis of ore", this paper discusses the prediction direction of medium distance ore prospecting, that is, the metallogenic belt of tectonic deformation lithofacies interface.

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	吕古贤.构造动力成岩成矿和构造物理化学研究[J].地质力学学报, 2019, 25(5):962-980. Google Scholar
[2]	Harkera.Metamorphism[M].London, 1932//蒋荫昌译.变质作用-岩石转变的研究[M].北京: 地质出版社, 1981: 1-373. Google Scholar
[3]	帕塔拉哈E N.构造相分析产生与发展[J].国外地质科技, 1991, (5):15-29. Google Scholar
[4]	贡恰罗夫M A等.变形-化学共生组合与构造-变质分带[J].国外地质科技, 1996, 3:48-53. Google Scholar
[5]	涂光炽.祁连山构造-岩相带的研究[J].地质科学, 1959, (7):193-198. Google Scholar
[6]	李四光.地壳构造与地壳运动[J].中国科学, 1973, 4:400-429. Google Scholar
[7]	杨开庆.构造带的特征与超基性岩体的铬铁矿的分布关系[J].地质力学论丛, 1979, 5:44-57. Google Scholar
[8]	Jones M E.The relationships between metamorphism and deformation ofrock[J].J.Struct.Geol., 1981, 3(3):333-338. doi: 10.1016/0191-8141(81)90029-8 CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	李四光.关于地质构造在三重基本概念[J].科学通报, 1953, 33(4):253-261. Google Scholar
[10]	涂光炽.什么是矿山地质工作?(一)[J].地质知识, 1956, (1):8-11. Google Scholar
[11]	吕古贤.胶东半岛构造-岩相形成及玲珑-焦家式金矿的构造动力成岩成矿地质特征研究[J].中国地质科学院院报, 1991, 2:65-80. Google Scholar
[12]	Sander B.Gefugekunde der Gesteine[M].Wien:Verlag Von Julius Springer, 1930:1-641. Google Scholar
[13]	Niggli P.Rocks and mineral deposits[M].San Francisco: W.H.Freeman and Company, 1954: 1-559. Google Scholar
[14]	王嘉荫.应力矿物概论[M].北京:地质出版社, 1978:1-238. Google Scholar
[15]	李四光.关于改进构造地质工作的几点意见[J].地质论评, 1965, 23(4):245-255. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.1965.04.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[16]	陈国达.成矿构造研究法[J].北京:地质出版社, 1978:1-413. Google Scholar
[17]	李四光.旋卷构造及其他有关中国西北部大地构造体系复合问题[J].地质学报, 1954, 34(4):339-410. Google Scholar
[18]	李四光.中国铬铁矿图册[M].北京:地质出版社, 1966. Google Scholar
[19]	卢金A H.岩浆期后矿床构造的地质填图[J].国外地质科技, 1991, (5):4-15. Google Scholar
[20]	许靖华.中国大地构造相图(1:400万)[M].北京:科学出版社, 1991:1-155. Google Scholar
[21]	李继亮.碰撞造山带大地构造相//现代地质研究文集(上)[M].南京: 南京大学出版社, 1992: 9-21. Google Scholar
[22]	潘桂棠, 肖庆辉, 陆松年, 等.大地构造相的定义、划分、特征及其鉴别标志[J].地质通报, 2008, 27(10):1613-1637. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2008.10.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[23]	方维萱.陕西省小秦岭地区断裂构造地球化学特征[J].地质与勘探, 1990, 26(12):60-63. Google Scholar
[24]	方维萱, 杜玉龙, 李建旭, 等.大比例尺构造岩相学填图技术与找矿预测[M].北京:地质出版社, 2018:1-377. Google Scholar
[25]	吕古贤.石槽矿区不同力学性质结构面中岩浆岩的某些变异问题探讨[J].中国地质学院院报, 1987, 17:65-80. Google Scholar
[26]	吕古贤, 王红才, 郭涛, 等.热源体分割程度引起热传导及其温度变化[J].科学通报, 1999, 44(10):1099-1102. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.1999.10.018 CrossRef Google Scholar
[27]	吕古贤, 武际春, 崔书学, 等.胶东玲珑金矿田地质[M].北京:科学出版社, 2013:1-685. Google Scholar
[28]	吕古贤, 孔庆存.胶东玲珑-焦家式金矿地质[M].北京:科学出版社, 1993. Google Scholar
[29]	胡受奚, 叶瑛, 方长泉.交代蚀变岩岩石学及其找矿意义[M].北京:地质出版社, 2004. Google Scholar