2024 Vol. 40, No. 1
Article Contents

GUO Li-Bin, HUANG Hua, ZHAOWen. 2024. Influencing Factors of Reservoir Physical Properties of Qianjiang Formation in Qianjiang Salt Lake Depression. South China Geology, 40(1): 75-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0013.2024.01.005
Citation: GUO Li-Bin, HUANG Hua, ZHAOWen. 2024. Influencing Factors of Reservoir Physical Properties of Qianjiang Formation in Qianjiang Salt Lake Depression. South China Geology, 40(1): 75-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0013.2024.01.005

Influencing Factors of Reservoir Physical Properties of Qianjiang Formation in Qianjiang Salt Lake Depression

  • The reservoir types of Qianjiang Salt Lake Depression are different from other Eastern Basins. Taking the Paleogene Qianjiang Formation reservoir as the research object,this article analyzes the reservoir properties of a large number of samples, observes thinsection under microscope, and studies diagenesis to define the unique reservoir types and their influencing factors in the Qianjiang Salt Lake Basin combining with exploration practice results.Sandstones, carbonate bearing sandstones and carbonate sandstones are considered as favorable conventional oil and gas reservoirs.Sandstone reservoirs are mainly distributed in sandstone and mudstone facies areas, while carbonatebearing sandstones and carbonate sandstones are mainly distributed in transitional lithofacies areas. And the physical properties of the three types reservoirs are mainly affected by sedimentary microfacies, cementation, dissolution besides compaction.. Sedimentary microfacies sandstones such as underwater branching channels, estuarine dams, and sheet sand exhibit medium porosity and good permeability, while carbonate bearing sandstone and carbonate sandstone in the transitional zone are of mainly low porosity and poor permeability. The development of dolomite, calcite, anhydrite and other cements seriously damaged the original intergranular pores of sandstone reservoirs, resulting in poor porosity and permeability of reservoirs. The organic acids formed during the hydrocarbon generation stage can dissolve early carbonate cements, forming secondary dissolution pores, and to some extent improving reservoir porosity and permeability. Under this dissolution mechanism, combined with hydrocarbon generation and pressure boosting, it is believed that carbonate bearing sandstone and carbonate sandstone have certain reservoir capacity and can serve as effective and subtle oil reservoirs in the study area.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 柏建新,石万忠,何勇.2014.潜江凹陷潜北地区潜四下段盐湖层序控制因素及层序模式[J].中国石油勘探,19(1):22-30.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 陈凤玲.2007.潜江盐湖构造演化及沉积充填与油气成藏[J].石油天然气学报,29(2):50-53.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 戴世昭.1997.江汉盐湖盆地石油地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,23-46.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 郭丽彬.2013.潜江凹陷潜江组沉积充填特征—基于钟112等井钻后[J].江汉石油职工大学学报,26(2):1-3.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 郭丽彬,付宜兴,张亮.2013.潜江凹陷潜四下亚段油藏勘探值得关注的领域[J].石油天然气学报,35(8):45-48.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 郭丽彬,李铭华.2015.潜江凹陷广华地区Eq40 油组沉积特征及潜力分析[J].江汉石油职工大学学报,28(1):4-6.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 郝芳,邹华耀,方勇,胡建武.2006.超压环境有机质热演化和生烃作用机理[J].石油学报,(5):9-18.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 黄华,袁娟梅,彭伟,张亮,文辉.2021.江汉盆地古近系潜江组盐湖沉积特征与成藏模式[J].岩性油气藏,33(2):9-16.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 江继纲,张谦.1982.江汉盆地潜江期盐湖沉积石油的形成与演化[J].石油与天然气地质,3(1):1-15.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 李乐,刘爱武,漆智先,吴世强,管文静.2020.潜江凹陷王场背斜潜四下段盐韵律层页岩储层孔隙结构特征[J].地球科学,45(2):602-616.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 李令.2017. 潜北断层发育特征及对沉积的控制作用研究[D].长江大学硕士学位论文.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 李铭华.2020.潜北断裂带勘探实践与启示[J].江汉石油职工大学学报,33(5):1-3.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 刘爱武,唐大卿,郭丽彬,文辉,唐文旭,邹帅.2022.江汉盆地潜北断裂带分段差异活动及演化[J].石油地球物理勘探,57(4):937-949.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 罗劲,李铭华,郭丽彬,钟庆良,孔金平,查光煜.2016.盐湖盆地复杂岩性区储层预测方法研究[J].石油实验地质,38(2):273-275.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 龙玉梅,陈曼霏,陈风玲,吴世强.2019.潜江凹陷潜江组盐间页岩油储层发育特征及影响因素[J].油气地质与采收率,(1):90-98.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 文辉.2019.潜江凹陷广浩地区Eq4~0 油组储层预测方法研究[J].江汉石油职工大学学报,32(4):34-37.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 徐姝慧.2018.江汉盆地潜江凹陷北部油气生储条件及油气运移指向[D].中国地质大学(武汉)硕士学位论文.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 徐文明,蒋启贵,刘伟新,陶国亮,张文涛,钱门辉,曹婷婷,鲍云杰,李志明.2020.江汉盆地潜江凹陷盐间潜34油组储层微观结构特征及与物性的关系[J].石油实验地质,42(4):565-574.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 张建荣.2013.潜江凹陷潜江组物源特征和沉积体系[J].江汉石油职工大学学报,26(6):1-3.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 张水山,张三元,周红艳,易小芹.2014.潜江凹陷蚌湖向斜周缘岩性油藏识别技术及效果[J].岩性油气藏,26(5):86-90.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 赵文,何生,郭小文,王永诗,郝雪峰,熊伟.2020.东营凹陷中央背斜带沙三段砂岩石英次生加大边发育特征及其指示意义[J].地球科学,45(9):3487-3501.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 郑有恒.2010.江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组岩性油藏勘探方向及对策[J].石油实验地质,32(4):330-333.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 周林,万方来,许丹丹,周坤,王刚.2013.碎屑岩成岩作用探讨[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,(4):125.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 邹威.2021.江汉盆地新沟嘴组储层物性特征及其控制因素[J].江汉石油职工大学学报,34(2):20-23.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(317) PDF downloads(31) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint