Study on Fluorine Chlorine Removal from Zinc Oxide Fume of Multiple-hearth Burner by Alkali Cleaning

Meng Lingju; Wang Yan; Li Ping

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2023.01.026

2023 No. 1

Article Contents

Article navigation > Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources > 2023 > 44(1): 182-184, 203

Next Article Previous Article

Meng Lingju, Wang Yan, Li Ping. Study on Fluorine Chlorine Removal from Zinc Oxide Fume of Multiple-hearth Burner by Alkali Cleaning[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2023, 44(1): 182-184, 203. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2023.01.026

Citation:

Meng Lingju, Wang Yan, Li Ping. Study on Fluorine Chlorine Removal from Zinc Oxide Fume of Multiple-hearth Burner by Alkali Cleaning[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2023, 44(1): 182-184, 203. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2023.01.026

Study on Fluorine Chlorine Removal from Zinc Oxide Fume of Multiple-hearth Burner by Alkali Cleaning

1.
Hebei Normal University for Nationalities, Chengde, Hebei, China
2.
Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, China

Received Date: 01 November 2021

Publish Date: 25 February 2023

Abstract

Abstract

In the hydro-zinc smelting system, a large amount of fluorine and chlorine ions not only hinder the smooth progress of the electrolysis process, but also accelerate the corrosion of the equipment. In this paper, the alkaline washing process is used to remove fluorine and chlorine from the high fluorine and chlorine zinc oxide soot from a multi-hearth furnace. Effect of sodium carbonate concentration, alkaline washing temperature, alkaline washing time, liquid-solid ratio, and sodium hydroxide concentration on the removal rate of fluorine and chlorine is studied, adding the influence of zinc loss rate. The results show that under the conditions of a sodium carbonate concentration of 150 g/L, an alkaline washing time of 2 h, a reaction temperature of 80℃, a slurry-to-solid ratio of 5∶1, and a sodium hydroxide concentration of 40 g/L, the composite lye will affect the multi-hearth furnace.The removal rate of zinc oxide, fluorine and chlorine is the best, 85.01% and 93.57% respectively, and the loss rate of zinc is 2.67%.
- Multi-hearth furnace /
- Zinc oxide /
- Alkaline washing /
- Defluorination and chlorine removal

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	申亚芳, 张馨圆, 王乐, 等. 氧化锌矿处理方法现状[J]. 矿产综合利用, 2020(2):23-28. SHEN Y F, ZHANG X Y, WANG L, et al. Preparation of zinc and its compounds from zinc oxide ore[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2020(2):23-28. Google Scholar
[2]	包洪光. 湿法炼锌中脱氟氯技术研究[J]. 世界有色金属, 2017(15):258-259. BAO H G. Research on technology of removing fluorine and chlorine in hydrometallurgical zinc smelting[J]. World Nonferrous Metals, 2017(15):258-259. Google Scholar
[3]	森维, 孙红燕, 李正永, 等. 氧化锌烟尘中氟氯脱除方法的研究进展[J]. 云南冶金, 2013, 42(6):42-45. SEN W, SUN H Y, LI Z Y, et al. Research progress of fluorine and chlorine removal methods from zinc oxide fumes[J]. Yunnan Metallurgy, 2013, 42(6):42-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0308.2013.06.010 CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	廖贻鹏. 某厂锌系统中F、Cl走向及分布和对生产影响的探讨[J]. 湖南有色金属, 2010, 26(5):29-32. LIAO Y P. Discussion on the trend and distribution of F and Cl in a zinc system in a factory and their influence on production[J]. Hunan Nonferrous Metals, 2010, 26(5):29-32. Google Scholar
[5]	谭青, 李启厚, 刘志宏, 等. 湿法炼锌过程中氟氯脱除技术研究现状[J]. 湿法冶金, 2015, 34(4):264-269. TAN Q, LI Q H, LIU Z H, et al. Research status of fluorine and chlorine removal technology in the process of hydrometallurgical zinc smelting[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2015, 34(4):264-269. Google Scholar
[6]	陈学刚, 曲洪涛, 陈霞. 含锗高铅氧化锌烟尘多膛炉脱氟氯设计与实践[J]. 中国有色冶金, 2015(2):19-23. CHEN X G, QU H T, CHEN X. Design and practice of multi-hearth furnace for removing fluorine and chlorine from germanium-containing high-lead zinc oxide fume[J]. China Nonferrous Metallurgy, 2015(2):19-23. Google Scholar
[7]	孙红燕, 孔馨, 森维, 等. 碳酸钠碱洗脱除高铅氧化锌烟尘中的氟氯[J]. 有色金属(冶炼部分), 2015(1):15-17. SUN H Y, KONG X, SEN W, et al. The elution of fluorine and chlorine in high-lead zinc oxide fumes with sodium carbonate alkali[J]. Nonferrous Metals (Extractive Metallurgy), 2015(1):15-17. Google Scholar