2025 Vol. 8, No. 2
Article Contents

Zong-yue Lu, Gen-yuan Liu, Xi-dong Zhao, Kang Sun, Yan-si Chen, Zhi-hong Song, Kai Xue, Ming-shan Yang, 2025. Landslide susceptibility assessment based on an interpretable coupled FR-RF model: A case study of Longyan City, Fujian Province, Southeast China, China Geology, 8, 281-294. doi: 10.31035/cg2024123
Citation: Zong-yue Lu, Gen-yuan Liu, Xi-dong Zhao, Kang Sun, Yan-si Chen, Zhi-hong Song, Kai Xue, Ming-shan Yang, 2025. Landslide susceptibility assessment based on an interpretable coupled FR-RF model: A case study of Longyan City, Fujian Province, Southeast China, China Geology, 8, 281-294. doi: 10.31035/cg2024123

Landslide susceptibility assessment based on an interpretable coupled FR-RF model: A case study of Longyan City, Fujian Province, Southeast China

More Information
  • To enhance the prediction accuracy of landslides in in Longyan City, China, this study developed a methodology for geologic hazard susceptibility assessment based on a coupled model composed of a Geographic Information System (GIS) with integrated spatial data, a frequency ratio (FR) model, and a random forest (RF) model (also referred to as the coupled FR-RF model). The coupled FR-RF model was constructed based on the analysis of nine influential factors, including distance from roads, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and slope. The performance of the coupled FR-RF model was assessed using metrics such as Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Precision-Recall (PR) curves, yielding Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 0.93 and 0.95, which indicate high predictive accuracy and reliability for geological hazard forecasting. Based on the model predictions, five susceptibility levels were determined in the study area, providing crucial spatial information for geologic hazard prevention and control. The contributions of various influential factors to landslide susceptibility were determined using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and the Gini index, enhancing the model interpretability and transparency. Additionally, this study discussed the limitations of the coupled FR-RF model and the prospects for its improvement using new technologies. This study provides an innovative method and theoretical support for geologic hazard prediction and management, holding promising prospects for application.

  • 加载中
  • Abraham MT, Satyam N, Lokesh R, Pradhan B, Alamri A. 2021. Factors affecting landslide susceptibility mapping: Assessing the influence of different machine learning approaches, sampling strategies and data splitting. Land, 10(9), 989. doi: 10.3390/land10090989.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Achour Y, Pourghasemi HR. 2020. How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Geoscience Frontiers, 11(3), 871–883. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.001.

    Google Scholar

    Achu AL, Aju CD, Di Napoli M, Prakash P, Gopinath G, Shaji E, Chandra V. 2023. Machine-learning based landslide susceptibility modelling with emphasis on uncertainty analysis. Geoscience Frontiers, 14(6), 101657. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101657.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Al-Najjar HAH, Pradhan B, Beydoun G, Sarkar R, Park HJ, Alamri A. 2023. A novel method using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)-based Shapley Additive Explanations for spatial landslide prediction using Time-Series SAR dataset. Gondwana Research, 123, 107–124. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2022.08.004.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Ali R, Kuriqi A, Kisi O. 2020. Human–environment natural disasters interconnection in China: A review. Climate, 8(4), 48. doi: 10.3390/cli8040048.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Rezaei K, Lee CW. 2019. Assessment of landslide susceptibility using statistical- and artificial intelligence-based FR–RF integrated model and multiresolution DEMs. Remote Sensing, 11(9), 999. doi: 10.3390/rs11090999.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. doi: 10.1023/A: 1010933404324. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.

    CrossRef Google Scholar