2022 Vol. 42, No. 3
Article Contents

HE Jianglin, CHENG Zhenghui, DONG Dazhong, SUN Shasha, WANG Zhiguo. 2022. The evolution of sedimentary environments of Dongyuemiao Member and key factors for enrichment of shale oil and gas, northeastern Sichuan Basin. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 42(3): 385-397. doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2022.05001
Citation: HE Jianglin, CHENG Zhenghui, DONG Dazhong, SUN Shasha, WANG Zhiguo. 2022. The evolution of sedimentary environments of Dongyuemiao Member and key factors for enrichment of shale oil and gas, northeastern Sichuan Basin. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 42(3): 385-397. doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2022.05001

The evolution of sedimentary environments of Dongyuemiao Member and key factors for enrichment of shale oil and gas, northeastern Sichuan Basin

More Information
  • Corresponding author: CHENG Zhenghui  
  • The organic-rich mud shale develops in Dongyuemiao Member of the Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin. Although a few of industrial shale oil and gas flow has been obtained, the large-scale production of shale oil and gas hasn't started yet, and the understanding of the enrichment mechanism of shale oil and gas in the region is not enough. Based on the field investigation and test analysis, this paper analyzes the evolution of sedimentary environments of the Dongyuemiao Member and discusses the main control factors for enrichment of shale oil and gas, in order to provide scientific suggestions for the breakthrough of shale oil and gas in the region. The results show that:(1) The Dongyuemiao Member had experienced a whole retrogradation-progradation cycle, and the organic-rich shale, which is in the semi-deep lake facies, is located at the middle of the Dongyuemiao Member; (2) The thickness of organic-rich shale in the Dongyuemiao Member is from 15 m to 30 m and its average TOC is 1.79%, and the kerogen is mainly in II type; (3) The thermal evolution degree of the Dongyuemiao Member is high, reaching condensate-moisture stage; (4) The pores are mainly composed by the soil mineral intergranular pores and organic pores, and the content of brittle minerals is moderate and the average brittleness index is 62.1% and the average porosity is 8.85%; (5)The permeability is extremely low, with an average of 0.239 mD. It is concluded that the Dongyuemiao Member belongs to the "high porosity and low permeability". The hydrocarbon in the Dongyuemiao Member is mainly migrated along the bed plane in lateral directions. The enrichment of the shale gas and oil in Dongyuemiao Member is closely related to the distribution of organic-rich shale, the thermal evolution of the shale, and the distribution of fractures. The prolific zones for shale gas and oil in Dongyuemiao Member are characterized with thick organic-rich shale and low hydrocarbon accumulation potential.
  • 加载中
  • Li D H, Li J Z, Zhang B, et al., 2017.Formation characteristics and resource potential of Jurassic tight oil in Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Research,2(4):301-314.

    Google Scholar

    Liu Z, Liu G, Hu Z, et al., 2020.Lithofacies types and assemblage features of continental shale strata and their implications for shale gas exploration:A case study of the Middle and Lower Jurassic strata in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry B,7(4):358-369.

    Google Scholar

    Pang Z L, Tao S Z, Zhang Q, et al., 2019.Enrichment factors and sweep spot evaluation of Jurassic tight oil in central Sichuan Basin, SW China[J].Petroleum Research, 4(4):1-14.

    Google Scholar

    Qiu Z, He J L, 2021.Depositional environment changes and organic matter accumulation of Pliensbachian-Toarcian lacustrine shales in the Sichuan Basin, SW China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,105035.

    Google Scholar

    Wang X, Jin Z, Zhao J, et al., 2020.Depositional environment and organic matter accumulation of Lower Jurassic nonmarine fine-grained deposits in the Yuanba Area, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 116:104352.

    Google Scholar

    Xu W, Ruhl M, Jenkyns H C, et al., 2017.Carbon sequestration in an expanded lake system during the Toarcian oceanic anoxic event[J].Nature Geoscince, 10(2):129-134.

    Google Scholar

    曹香妮,姜振学,朱德宇,等,2019.川东北地区自流井组陆相页岩岩相类型及储层发育特征[J].天然气地球科学,30(12):1782-1793.

    Google Scholar

    范昱,2011.川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组层序地层及沉积充填特征研究[D].成都:成都理工大学.

    Google Scholar

    付小平,杨滔,2021.川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙结构特征[J].石油实验地质,43(4):589-598.

    Google Scholar

    高健,林良彪,任天龙,等,2016.川北地区下侏罗统东岳庙段页岩气富集主控因素研究[J].岩性油气藏,28(5):67-75.

    Google Scholar

    郭彤楼,李宇平,魏志红,2011.四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩气成藏条件[J].天然气地球科学,22(1):1-7.

    Google Scholar

    郭旭升,2014.涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块富集机理与勘探技术[M].北京:科学出版社.

    Google Scholar

    何江林,刘伟,杨平,等,2017.四川盆地西南缘五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气形成条件与有利区优选[J].沉积与特提斯地质,37(3):50-58.

    Google Scholar

    何江林,王剑,余谦,等,2018.外源补给型页岩气的发现及油气地质意义[J].石油学报,39(1):12-22.

    Google Scholar

    胡东风,魏志红,刘若冰,等,2021.湖相页岩油气富集主控因素与勘探潜力——以四川盆地涪陵地区侏罗系为例[J].天然气工业,41(8):113-120.

    Google Scholar

    黄金亮,邹才能,李建忠,等,2012.川南志留系龙马溪组页岩气形成条件与有利区分析[J].煤炭学报,37(5):782-787.

    Google Scholar

    贾爱林,2018.中国天然气开发技术进展及展望[J].天然气工业,38(4):77-86.

    Google Scholar

    李登华,李建忠,张斌,等,2017.四川盆地侏罗系致密油形成条件、资源潜力与甜点区预测[J].石油学报,38(7):740-752.

    Google Scholar

    黎茂稳, 金之钧, 董明哲,等, 2020.陆相页岩形成演化与页岩油富集机理研究进展[J].石油实验地质, 42(4):489-505.

    Google Scholar

    李英强,何登发,2014.四川盆地及邻区早侏罗世构造-沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J].石油学报,35(2):219-232.

    Google Scholar

    刘皓天,李雄,万云强,等,2020.陆相页岩气形成条件及勘探开发潜力——以川东涪陵北地区侏罗系东岳庙段为例[J].海相油气地质,25(2):148-154.

    Google Scholar

    刘树根,汪华,孙玮,等,2008.四川盆地海相领域油气地质条件专属性问题分析[J].石油与天然气地质,29(6):781-792.

    Google Scholar

    罗东东,2019.川东北陆相页岩气形成条件及富集主控因素[D].中国石油大学(北京).

    Google Scholar

    牟传龙,2022.关于相的命名及其分类的建议[OL].沉积与特提斯地质,42(3):331-339.DOI:10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2022.03001.

    Google Scholar

    舒志国,周林,李雄,等,2021.四川盆地东部复兴地区侏罗系自流井组东岳庙段陆相页岩凝析气藏地质特征及勘探开发前景[J].石油与天然气地质,42(1):212-223.

    Google Scholar

    孙艳妮,2018.川中地区公山庙油田大安寨段致密油成藏特征[D].成都:西南石油大学.

    Google Scholar

    王世谦,胡素云,董大忠,2012.川东侏罗系——四川盆地亟待重视的一个致密油气新领域[J].天然气工业,32(12):22-29.

    Google Scholar

    王昕尧,金振奎,朱毅秀,等,2021.四川盆地自流井组陆相页岩石英成因研究[J].沉积学报, doi:org/10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.053.

    Google Scholar

    肖富森,黄东,张本健,等,2019.四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组天然气地球化学特征及地质意义[J].石油学报,40(5):568-576.

    Google Scholar

    肖继林,魏祥峰,李海军,2018.涪陵海相页岩气和元坝-兴隆场湖相页岩气富集条件差异性分析[J].天然气勘探与开发,41(4):8-17.

    Google Scholar

    许效松,刘宝珺,1994.中国南方岩相古地理图集[M].北京:科学出版社.

    Google Scholar

    杨跃明,黄东,2019.四川盆地侏罗系湖相页岩油气地质特征及勘探开发新认识[J].天然气工业,39(6):22-33.

    Google Scholar

    张本健,潘珂,吴长江,等,2022.四川盆地金秋气田侏罗系沙溪庙组多期砂组天然气复合成藏机理及模式[J].天然气工业,42(1):51-61.

    Google Scholar

    张快,2015.涪陵区块下侏罗统页岩气形成条件分析及有利层系优选[D].成都:成都理工大学.

    Google Scholar

    赵帮胜,李荣西,覃小丽,等,2019.鄂尔多斯盆地中部上古生界山西组页岩储层特征[J].沉积学报,37(6):1140-1151.

    Google Scholar

    朱彤,包书景,王烽,2012.四川盆地陆相页岩气形成条件及勘探开发前景[J].天然气工业,32(9):16-21.

    Google Scholar

    朱彤,龙胜祥,王烽,等,2016.四川盆地湖相泥页岩沉积模式及岩石相类型[J].天然气工业,36(8):22-28.

    Google Scholar

    邹玉涛,段金宝,赵艳军,等,2015.川东高陡断褶带构造特征及其演化[J].地质学报,89(11):2046-2052.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1272) PDF downloads(90) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint