EVALUATION OF A NEW DYNAMIC LASER PARTICLE SIZE &SHAPE ANALYZER AND COMPARISON WITH THE SIEVING AND LASER DIFFRACTION PARTICLE SIZE ANALYZER

ZHAO Xufeng; JIA Jianjun; WANG Xinkai; CAI Tinglu; YANG Yang; SHI Lianqiang; XIA Xiaoming

doi:10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2015.06.018

2015 Vol. 35, No. 6

Article Contents

Article navigation > Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology > 2015 > 35(6): 175-184

Next Article Previous Article

ZHAO Xufeng, JIA Jianjun, WANG Xinkai, CAI Tinglu, YANG Yang, SHI Lianqiang, XIA Xiaoming. EVALUATION OF A NEW DYNAMIC LASER PARTICLE SIZE &SHAPE ANALYZER AND COMPARISON WITH THE SIEVING AND LASER DIFFRACTION PARTICLE SIZE ANALYZER[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2015, 35(6): 175-184. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2015.06.018

Citation:

ZHAO Xufeng, JIA Jianjun, WANG Xinkai, CAI Tinglu, YANG Yang, SHI Lianqiang, XIA Xiaoming. EVALUATION OF A NEW DYNAMIC LASER PARTICLE SIZE &SHAPE ANALYZER AND COMPARISON WITH THE SIEVING AND LASER DIFFRACTION PARTICLE SIZE ANALYZER[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2015, 35(6): 175-184. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2015.06.018

EVALUATION OF A NEW DYNAMIC LASER PARTICLE SIZE &SHAPE ANALYZER AND COMPARISON WITH THE SIEVING AND LASER DIFFRACTION PARTICLE SIZE ANALYZER

State Research Centre for Island Exploitation and Management, The Second Institute of Oceanography, SOA;Hangzhou, 310012

Received Date: 30 October 2014

Revised Date: 16 January 2015

Abstract

Abstract

140 samples of beach sand collected in Hainan and Zhejiang Provinces were sieved for 0.5Φ interval and 455 sub-samples were obtained.These sub-samples are used to test QICPIC,a new dynamic laser particle size &shape analyzer.The results are compared with those by HELOS,a laser diffraction particle size analyzer.It is found that comparing to sieving method,the median particle size given by both QICPIC and HELOS are coarser,or about 0.25~0.5Φ finer in Phi-diameter.The ranges of particle size measured by QICPIC and HELOS are wider.The HELOS is more sensitive to both fine and coarse fractions than QICPIC.Sphericity and particle size shows an approximately negative correlation.There is a significant linear correlation between median particle size measured by HELOS and QICPIC.Therefore,a formula(H=1.020 4×Q+0.047 9)is suggested in this paper to transform the median particle size given by QICPIC into that of HELOS.The difference of the results between the laser particle size analyzers(QICPIC and HELOS)and sieving method is mainly from the difference in measuring principles,the non-repeatability of sampling and the dispersion.
- particle size /
- sieving /
- laser particle size analyzer /
- sand

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	McCAVE I N,Syvitski J P M.Principles and methods of geological particle size analysis[C]//In:Syvitski J P M (editor). Principles,methods and application of particle size analysis. Cambridge University Press,1991:3-21. Google Scholar
[2]	蔡廷禄,贾建军,汪亚平.河口海岸和近海沉积物的粒度资料同化技术[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2014,34(1):185-193. Google Scholar [CAI Tinglu,JIA Jianjun,WANG Yaping.Techniques for particle size data standardization:an example from estuarine and coastal sediments[J].Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology,2014,34(1):185-193.] Google Scholar
[3]	Syvitski J P M,Leblanc K W G,Asprey K W.Interlaboratory instrument calibration experiment[C]//In:Syvitski J P M, (editor).Principles,methods and application of particle size analysis. Cambridge University Press,New York,1991:174-193. Google Scholar
[4]	McManus D A.A criticism of certain usage of the Phi-Notation[J].Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1963,33(3):670-674. Google Scholar
[5]	Folk R L,Ward W C.Brazos river bar:a study in the signification of grain size parameters[J].Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1957,27:3-27. Google Scholar
[6]	McManus J.Grain size determination and interpretation[C]//In:Tucker M (editor).Techniques in Sedimentology.Backwell, Oxford,1988:63-85. Google Scholar
[7]	贾建军,高抒,薛允传.图解法与矩法沉积物粒度参数的对比[J].海洋与湖沼,2002,33(6):577-582. Google Scholar [JIA Jianjun,GAO Shu,XUE Yuanchuan.Grain-size parameters derived from graphic and moment methods:A comparative study[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia sinica,2002,33(6):621-626.] Google Scholar
[8]	和瑞莉,吉俊峰,王爱霞.激光法与筛分法泥沙颗粒测试浅析[J].中国粉体技术,2005,11(Z1):181-184. Google Scholar [HE Ruili,JI Junfeng,WANG Aixia.Analysis of results between laser particle analyzer and sieving method in particle size distribution[J].China Powder Science and Technology,2005,11(Z1):181-184.] Google Scholar
[9]	高抒.海洋沉积动力学研究导引[M].南京:南京大学出版社, 2013.[Shu Gao.Research guide of marine sediment dynamics[M].Nanjing:Nanjing University Press,2013.] Google Scholar
[10]	Gao S,Collins M.Net sediment transport patterns inferred from grain-size trends,based upon definition of "transport vectors"[J].Sedimentary Geology,1992a,81(3/4):47-60. Google Scholar
[11]	范北林,闵凤阳,黎礼刚,等.几种模型沙激光粒度仪测试结果与筛析-沉降法的比较[J].长江科学院院报,2009,26(12):6-9. Google Scholar [FAN Beilin,MIN Fengyang,LI Ligang,et al.Comparison between grain sizes measured by laser diffract instrument and sieve pipette methods for several model sediment[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2009, 26(12):6-9.] Google Scholar
[12]	程鹏,高抒,李徐生.激光粒度仪测试结果及其与沉降法、筛析法的比较[J].沉积学报,2001,19(3):449-455. Google Scholar [CHENG Peng,GAO Shu,LI Xusheng.Evaluation of a wide rang laser particle size analyses and comparison with Pipette and Sieving methods[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2001,19(3):449-455.] Google Scholar
[13]	Jonasz M.Size,shape,composition and structure of microparticles from light scattering[C]//In:SyvitskiJ P M (editor). Principles,methods and application of particle size analysis. Cambridge University Press,NewYork,1991:143-162.] Google Scholar