| Citation: |
GAO Chengpeng. Model tests of road subsidence progress with underground cavities caused by cyclic dynamic load[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(1): 70-77. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202003002
|
Model tests of road subsidence progress with underground cavities caused by cyclic dynamic load
-
Abstract
Due to the cyclic dynamic load, the underground cavity will gradually develop into road subsidence. In view of this problem, this paper establishes model tests to simulate the whole developing process of road subsidence. The results show that as the cyclic dynamic load decreases, the limited cyclic loading times causing road subsidence increases exponentially. However, if there is a certain size of underground cavity, small cyclic dynamic load can also lead to road subsidence after sufficient cyclic loading times. The soil with larger maximum particle size and higher uneven coefficient has larger ultimate static strength and smaller ultimate dynamic strength. On the contrary, soil with smaller maximum particle size and smaller uneven coefficient has smaller ultimate static strength and larger ultimate dynamic strength. Larger thickness of the soil overlying the underground cavity will lead to larger ultimate static and dynamic strength. At the same time, the development of the road subsidence curve and the soil cracks under the cyclic dynamic load undergo three stages. Stage 1 is the initial consolidation settlement stage with short duration. In this stage, the soil is compacted by vibration and the ground surface has overall settlement with no obvious development of the observed soil cracks. Stage 2 is the uniform development stage with long duration and uniform development in settlement and soil cracks. The soil is subjected to the effect of shear vibrating. Stage 3 is the accelerated development stage with the shortest duration. The soil is subjected to vibration failure. The settlement and soil cracks develop rapidly until road subsidence occurs.
-
Keywords:
- cyclic dynamic load /
- ground subsidence /
- model tests
-
-
References
[1] 杨赛. 基于双拱效应的地下空洞上覆土质地层变形与塌陷研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2018. YANG Sai. Study on deformation and collapse of soil stratum above underground cavities based on the double-arch effect[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) [2] 彭涛, 葛少亭, 武威, 等. 岩溶土洞发育区地基塌陷的治理[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2001,28(3):55 − 57. [PENG Tao, GE Shaoting, WU Wei, et al. Remeadiations of foundation collapse in the soil cavity area of Karst[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology,2001,28(3):55 − 57. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2001.03.016 [3] 冯伟, 么惠全. 采空塌陷区管道成灾机理分析及工程防治措施[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2010,37(3):112 − 115. [FENG Wei, YAO Huiquan. Analysis of disaster mechanism and countermeasures for endangered pipeline security in mining subsidence areas[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2010,37(3):112 − 115. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2010.03.024 [4] 杜正民, 吴光明, 洪亮. 潜蚀作用导致岩溶塌陷地质灾害的实例分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2007,34(3):89 − 92. [DU Zhengmin, WU Guangming, HONG Liang. A case study of the geological hazard of Karst land collapse caused by groundwater corroding[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2007,34(3):89 − 92. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2007.03.023 [5] 程星, 黄润秋. 铁路振动及其在岩溶塌陷中的致塌力研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(12):2062 − 2066. [CHENG Xing, HUANG Runqiu. Study on train-induced vibration and its influence on Karst collapse[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2003,22(12):2062 − 2066. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2003.12.021 [6] 张成平, 岳跃敬, 王梦恕. 隧道施工扰动下管线渗漏水对地面塌陷的影响及控制[J]. 土木工程学报,2015,48(增刊1):351 − 356. [ZHANG Chengping, YUE Yuejing, WANG Mengshu. Infl uence of pipeline leakage on ground collapse and its control during adjacent tunnelling[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2015,48(Sup1):351 − 356. (in Chinese with English abstract) [7] 周健, 姚志雄, 张刚. 砂土渗流过程的细观数值模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报,2007,29(7):977 − 981. [ZHOU Jian, YAO Zhixiong, ZHANG Gang. Mesomechanical simulation of seepage flow in sandy soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2007,29(7):977 − 981. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.07.004 [8] 张冬梅, 高程鹏, 尹振宇, 等. 隧道渗流侵蚀的颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学,2017,38(增刊1):429 − 438. [ZHANG Dongmei, GAO Chengpeng, YIN Zhenyu, et al. Particle flow simulation of seepage erosion around shield tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2017,38(Sup1):429 − 438. (in Chinese with English abstract) [9] ZHANG Dongmei, GAO Chengpeng, YIN Zhenyu. CFD-DEM modeling of seepage erosion around shield tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2019,83:60 − 72. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.017 [10] 陶连金, 袁松, 安军海. 城市道路地下空洞病害发展机理及对路面塌陷的影响[J]. 黑龙江科技大学学报,2015,25(3):289 − 293. [TAO Lianjin, YUAN Song, AN Junhai. Development mechanism of cavity damage under urban roads and its influence on road surface subsidence[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology,2015,25(3):289 − 293. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7262.2015.03.013 [11] 李涛, 张子真, 宗露丹. 地下空洞引起土质地层地陷的形成机制与预测研究[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(7):1995 − 2002. [LI Tao, ZHANG Zizhen, ZONG Ludan. Study of formation mechanism and prediction of sinkholes in soil stratum induced by subterranean cavity[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015,36(7):1995 − 2002. (in Chinese with English abstract) [12] 张成平, 王梦恕, 张顶立, 等. 城市隧道施工诱发地面塌陷的预测模型[J]. 中国铁道科学,2012,33(4):31 − 37. [ZHANG Chengping, WANG Mengshu, ZHANG Dingli, et al. Prediction model for ground collapse induced by urban tunnelling[J]. China Railway Science,2012,33(4):31 − 37. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2012.04.06 -
Access History
Figures(11)
Tables(1)
Export File
Citation
GAO Chengpeng. Model tests of road subsidence progress with underground cavities caused by cyclic dynamic load[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(1): 70-77. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202003002
Format
Content
DownLoad:
-
Figure 1.
Developing progress of road collapse under traffic load
-
Figure 2.
Schematic diagram of the cyclic dynamic loading test device
-
Figure 3.
Underground cavity mold
-
Figure 4.
Schematic diagram of the rubber layer above the soil
-
Figure 5.
Schematic diagram of the laser rangefinder
-
Figure 6.
Cyclic dynamic load testing site
-
Figure 7.
Grain size distribution of the experimental soil
-
Figure 8.
Relationship between the dynamic load W and the ultimate cyclic loading times N
- Figure 9.
-
Figure 10.
Development curve between the central displacement of the soil trough and the cyclic loading times
-
Figure 11.
Development of the soil cracks on the underground cavity at the critical cycling times (Case2-4)