2024 Vol. 40, No. 10
Article Contents

LIU Na'na, ZHANG Peixian, XIA Wei, GAO Quanfang, WANG Kaiming, ZHOU Di'na. The differences in reservoir property between marine and transitional facies shale gas: a case study of the Longtan Formation and the Longmaxi Formation in Nanchuan, Sichuan[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2024, 40(10): 49-60. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2023.184
Citation: LIU Na'na, ZHANG Peixian, XIA Wei, GAO Quanfang, WANG Kaiming, ZHOU Di'na. The differences in reservoir property between marine and transitional facies shale gas: a case study of the Longtan Formation and the Longmaxi Formation in Nanchuan, Sichuan[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2024, 40(10): 49-60. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2023.184

The differences in reservoir property between marine and transitional facies shale gas: a case study of the Longtan Formation and the Longmaxi Formation in Nanchuan, Sichuan

  • The shale strata in Nanchuan area, Sichuan, SW China, include sedimentary types of transitional facies and marine facies. The gas in marine shale represented by the Longmaxi Formation has been commercially developed, while that in the transitional facies shale represented by the Longtan Formation remain poorly understood. Based on data from field outcrops, drilling cores, thin sections, argon ion polishing scanning electron microscope, and Formation MicroScanner Image (FMI) imaging logging data, the differences in the characteristics of the two shale reservoirs were analyzed in terms of sedimentary facies, lithological combinations, reservoir conditions, mineral components, compressibility, and gas content. Results show that there are great differences in those aspects. ① The lithology of Longtan Formation is complex, including silty shale, carbonaceous shale, gray shale, limestone and coal seam, while the Longmaxi Formation is dominated by siliceous shale. ② Influenced by lithology, organic matter type, and thermal evolution degree, the reservoir space of Longtan Formation is dominated by micro-fractures (grain margin fractures and shrinkage fractures) and inorganic pores, while that of Longmaxi Formation is dominated by organic pores and micro-fractures. ③ The shale of Longtan Formation has high clay mineral content (47.6%), low brittle mineral content (35.8%), low Young's modulus (32.3 GPa), high Poisson ratio (0.3), strong plasticity, and lower compressibility than those of Longmaxi Formation. ④ The average gas content in Longtan Formation shale is 2.2 m3/t, in which 54.5% is adsorption gas; and the average gas content of Longmaxi shale is 5.2 m3/t, in which 43.3% is adsorption gas. Through the difference analysis of the two types of shale reservoirs, the characteristics of Longtan shale reservoir are defined, which are characterized by complex lithology, high clay mineral content, poor compressibility and high adsorption gas proportion. Therefore, the shale of the first member of the Longtan Formation has large continuous thickness, high gas content, good reservoir physical properties. In overall, it should be the "dessert" section of Longtan Formation. However, due to high clay mineral content, the coupling between geological "sweet spot" and engineering "sweet spot" is worse than that of Longmaxi shale. It is recommended to improve the fracturing technology, increase the volume of fracture network transformation and the output of a single well, so as to achieve exploration breakthroughs.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 邹才能,翟光明,张光亚,等. 全球常规-非常规油气形成分布、资源潜力及趋势预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):13-25. doi: 10.11698/PED.2015.01.02

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    ZOU Caineng,ZHAI Guangming,ZHANG Guangya,et al. Formation,distribution,potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(1):13-25. doi: 10.11698/PED.2015.01.02

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] 马永生,蔡勋育,赵培荣. 中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2018,45(4):561-574. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.04.03

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    MA Yongsheng,CAI Xunyu,ZHAO Peirong. China’s shale gas exploration and development:understanding and practice[J]. Petroleum Exploration and development,2018,45(4):561-574. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.04.03

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] 董大忠,邱振,张磊夫,等. 海陆过渡相页岩气层系沉积研究进展与页岩气新发现[J]. 沉积学报,2021,39(1):29-45.

    Google Scholar

    DONG Dazhong,QIU Zhen,ZHANG Leifu,et al. Progress on sedimentology of transitional facies shales and new discoveries of shale gas[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2021,39(1):29-45.

    Google Scholar

    [4] QIU Z,ZOU C N. Controlling factors on the formation and distribution of “sweet-spot areas” of marine gas shales in South China and a preliminary discussion on unconventional petroleum sedimentology[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2020,194:103989 doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.103989

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] WANG E Z,GUO T L,LIU B ,et al. Lithofacies and pore features of marine-continental transitional shale and gas enrichment conditions of favorable lithofacies:a case study of Permian Longtan Formation in the Lintanchang area,southeast of Sichuan Basin,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(6):1310-1322.

    Google Scholar

    [6] ZHANG P X,ZHANG Z P,JIANG S L,et al. Geological characteristics and enrichment model of Permian Mao 1 Member shale gas reservoirs in Nanchuan area[J]. Natural Gas Industry B,2022,9(1):96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ngib.2021.12.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] 张培先,聂海宽,何希鹏,等. 渝东南地区古生界天然气成藏体系及立体勘探[J]. 地球科学,2023,48(1):206-222.

    Google Scholar

    ZHANG Peixian,NIE Haikuan,HE Xipeng,et al. Paleozoic gas accumulation system and stereoscopic exploration in southeastern Chongqing[J]. Earth Science,2023,48(1):206-222.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 郭旭升,胡东风,李宇平,等. 海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考:以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩和自流井组大安寨段为例[J]. 地学前缘,2016,23(2):18-28.

    Google Scholar

    GUO Xusheng,HU Dongfeng,LI Yuping,et al. Analyses and thoughts on accumulation mechanisms of marine and lacustrine shale gas:A case study in shales of Longmaxi Formation and Daanzhai Section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):18-28.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 胡东风,魏志红,刘若冰,等. 湖相页岩油气富集主控因素与勘探潜力:以四川盆地涪陵地区侏罗系为例[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(8):113-120. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.08.011

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    HU Dongfeng,WEI Zhihong,LIU Ruobing,et al. Enrichment control factors and exploration potential of lacustrine shale oil and gas:a case study of Jurassic in the Fuling area of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(8):113-120. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.08.011

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] 郭旭升,蔡勋育,刘金连,等. 中国石化“十三五”天然气勘探进展与前景展望[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(8):12-22.

    Google Scholar

    GUO Xusheng,CAI Xunyu,LIU Jinlian,et al. Natural gas exploration progress of SINOPEC during the 13th Five-Year Plan and prospect forecast during the 14th Five-Year Plan[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(8):12-22.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 蔡勋育,刘金连,张宇,等. 中国石化“十三五”油气勘探进展与“十四五”前景展望 [J]. 中国石油勘探,2021,26(1):31-42.

    Google Scholar

    CAI Xunyu,LIU Jinlian,ZHANG Yu ,et al. Oil and gas exploration progress of SINOPEC during the 13th Five-Year Plan period and prospect forecast for the 14th Five-Year Plan[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2021,26(1):31-42.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 郭旭升,胡东风,魏志红,等. 涪陵页岩气田的发现与勘探认识[J]. 中国石油勘探,2016,21(3):24-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2016.03.003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    GUO Xusheng,HU Dongfeng,WEI Zhihong,et al. Discovery and exploration of Fuling shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Exploration of China,2016,21(3):24-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2016.03.003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] 何希鹏. 四川盆地东部页岩气甜点评价体系与富集高产影响因素[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(1):59-71. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.01.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    HE Xipeng. Sweet spot evaluation system and enrichment and high yield influential factors of shale gas in Nanchuan area of eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(1):59-71. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.01.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] 张培先,何希鹏,高玉巧,等. 川东南五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气目标评价及水平井设计技术[J]. 科学技术与工程,2023,23(3):1024-1032. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2023.03.015

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    ZHANG Peixian,HE Xipeng,GAO Yuqiao,et al. Shale gas target evaluation techniques and horizontal well design technology of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Southeast Sichuan[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2023,23(3):1024-1032. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2023.03.015

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] 张培先,高全芳,何希鹏,等. 南川地区龙马溪组页岩气地应力场特征及对产量影响分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2023,30(4):55-65.

    Google Scholar

    ZHANG Peixian,GAO Quanfang,HE Xipeng,et al. Characteristics of in-situ stress field and its influence on shale gas production from Longmaxi Formation in Nanchuan area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2023,30(4):55-65.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 何贵松,何希鹏,高玉巧,等. 重庆南川地区龙潭组页岩气地质特征与甜点优选[J] . 地质学报,2021,96(6) :3131-2142

    Google Scholar

    HE Guisong,HE Xipeng,GAO Yuqiao,Geological characteristics and sweet spot optimization of Longtan Formation shale gas in Nanchuan area,Chongqing [J] . Acta Geologica Sinica,2021,96(6) :3131-2142.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 陈斐然,魏祥峰,刘珠江,等. 四川盆地二叠系龙潭组页岩孔隙发育特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学,2020,31(11):1593-1602.

    Google Scholar

    CHEN Feiran,WEI Xiangfeng,LIU Zhujiang,et al. Pore development characteristics and main controlling factors of the Permian marine-continent transitional shale in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2020,31(11):1593-1602.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 郭旭升,胡东风,刘若冰,等. 四川盆地二叠系海陆过渡相页岩气地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(10):11-18. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.10.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    GUO Xusheng,HU Dongfeng,LIU Ruobing,et al. Geological conditions and exploration potential of Permian marine-continent transitional facies shale gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(10):11-18. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.10.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] 刘光祥,金之钧,邓模,等. 川东地区上二叠统龙潭组页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2015,36(3):481-487.

    Google Scholar

    LIU Guangxiang,JIN Zhijun,DENG Mo,et al. Exploration potential for shale gas in the Upper Permian Longtan Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(3):481-487.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 蔡潇,王亮,靳雅夕,等. 渝东南地区页岩有机质孔隙类型及特征[J]. 天然气地球科学,2016,27(3):513-519. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.03.0513

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    CAI Xiao,WANG Liang,JIN Yaxi,et al. Types and characteristics of organic pore in shale gas reservoir of southeastern Chongqing area[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(3):513-519. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.03.0513

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] 何希鹏,何贵松,高玉巧,等. 渝东南盆缘转换带常压页岩气地质特征及富集高产规律[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(12):1-14. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.12.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    HE Xipeng,HE Guisong,GAO Yuqiao,et al. Geological characteristics and enrichment laws of normal-pressure shale gas in the basin-margin transition zone of SE Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(12):1-14. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.12.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] 刘虎,曹涛涛,戚明辉,等. 四川盆地东部华蓥山地区龙潭组页岩气储层特征[J]. 天然气地球科学,2019,30(1):11-26.

    Google Scholar

    LIU Hu,CAO Taotao,QI Minghui,et al. Reservoir characteristics of Longtan Formationshale gas in Huayingshan area,eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30(1):11-26.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 张吉振,李贤庆,刘 洋,等. 川南地区龙潭组页岩气成藏条件及有利区分析[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2015,26(12):1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2015.12.01

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    ZHANG Jizhen,LI Xianqing,LIU Yang,et al. Longtan Formation shale gas reservoir conditions and favorable region analysis in southern Sichuan area[J]. Coal geology of China,2015,26(12):1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2015.12.01

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] 曹涛涛,邓模,刘虎,等. 川南-黔北地区龙潭组页岩气成藏条件分析 [J]. 特种油气藏 ,2018,25(3):6-12.

    Google Scholar

    CAO Taotao,DENG Mo,LIU Hu,et al. Shale gas accumulation condition analysis of Longtan Formation in Southern Sichuan-Northern Guizhou[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(3):6-12.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 何希鹏,齐艳平,何贵松,等. 渝东南构造复杂区常压页岩气富集高产主控因素再认识[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2019,9(5):32-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2019.05.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    HE Xipeng,QI Yanping,HE Guisong,et al. Further understanding of main controlling factors of normal pressure shale gas enrichment and high yield in the area with complex structure of the southeast area of Chongqing[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2019,9(5):32-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2019.05.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] 涂乙,邹海燕,孟海平,等. 页岩气评价标准与储层分类[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2014,35(1):153-158.

    Google Scholar

    TU Yi,ZOU Haiyan,MENG Haiping,et al. Evaluation criteria and classification of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Oil and Gas Geology,2014,35(1):153-158.

    Google Scholar

    [27] 赵培荣,高波,郭战峰,等. 四川盆地上二叠统海陆过渡相和深水陆棚相页岩气的勘探潜力[J]. 石油实验地质,2020,42(3):335-344.

    Google Scholar

    ZHAO Peirong,GAO Bo,GUO Zhanfeng,et al. Exploration potential of marine-continental transitional and deep-water shelf gas in Upper Perminan Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2020,42(3):335-344.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 周东升,许林峰,潘继平,等. 扬子地块上二叠统龙潭组页岩气勘探前景[J]. 天然气工业,2012,32(12):6-10. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.12.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    ZHOU Dongsheng,XU Linfeng,PAN Jiping,et al. Prospect of shale gas exploration in the Upper Permian Longtan Formation in the Yangtze Massif[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(12):6-10. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.12.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] 李东海,姚红生,何希鹏,等. 复杂构造区常压页岩气地质理论与资源潜力[D]. 北京:地质出版社,2022.

    Google Scholar

    LI Donghai,YAO Hongsheng,HE Xipeng,et al. Geological theory and resource potential of normal pressure shale gas in the area with complex structure[D]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2022.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 邹才能,赵群,董大忠,等. 页岩气基本特征、主要挑战与未来前景[J]. 天然气地球科学,2017,28(12):1781-1796.

    Google Scholar

    ZOU Caineng,ZHAO Qun,DONG Dazhong,et al. Geological characteristics,main challenges and future prospect of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(12):1781-1796.

    Google Scholar

    [31] 龙鹏宇,张金川,唐玄,等. 泥页岩裂缝发育特征及其对页岩气勘探和开发的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):525-532.

    Google Scholar

    LONG Pengyu,ZHANG Jinchuan,TANG Xuan,et al. Feature of muddy shale fissure and its effect for shale gas exploration and development[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):525-532.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 聂海宽,张金川. 页岩气储层类型和和特征研究:以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J]. 石油实验地质,2011,33(3):219-232. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2011.03.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    NIE Haikuan,ZHANG Jinchuan. Types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir:a case study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2011,33(3):219-232. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2011.03.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] 姚红生,蔡勋育,郭彤楼,等. 渝东南常压页岩气勘探开发关键技术[D]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2023.

    Google Scholar

    YAO Hongsheng,CAI Xunyu,GUO Tonglou,et al. Key technologies for exploration and development of atmospheric shale gas in southeast Chongqing[D]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2023.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 郭旭升,胡东风,文治董,等. 四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素:以焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 中国地质,2014,41(3):893-901.

    Google Scholar

    GUO Xusheng,HU Dongfeng,WEN Zhidong,et al. Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity in marine shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin an its periphery:a case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation of Jiaoshiba area[J]. Geology in China,2014,41(3):893-901.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(9)

Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(144) PDF downloads(15) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint