| Qingdao Institute of marine geology, China Geological Survey | Host |
| Citation: |
HAN Mingxing, YIN Ping, CHU Zhongxin, TIAN Yuan, CAO Ke, LI Meina, GUANG Xia, GAO Bin, ZHANG Xu, TIAN Yuqing, HAN Huihui. Characteristics and influencing factors of water and sediment changes in Jiaojiang River Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2022, 38(12): 26-39. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.168
|
Characteristics and influencing factors of water and sediment changes in Jiaojiang River Basin
-
Abstract
Under the influence of climate change and human activities, more and more people pay attention to the changes of runoff and sediment processes. It is of great significance to study the characteristics and influencing factors of water and sediment changes in Jiaojiang River Basin, Zhejiang, China, for ecological protection and high-quality development. Based on the long-term monitoring data of precipitation, runoff, sediment transport, and remote sensing images of the basin, we comprehensively analyzed the evolution characteristics of precipitation, runoff, and sediment transport in the basin using various methods, including linear regression trend analysis of hydrological observation data, catastrophe test of hydrological series by Mann-Kendall catastrophe test, sliding T test, anomaly cumulative curve method, double-cumulative-curve method, and periodic analysis of hydrological series by wavelet and power spectrum. Moreover, the linear regression method was used to estimate the contribution rate of human activities and climate change to the sediment transport change in the river basin. At last, the influence of human activities on the water and sediment change in the river basin was discussed. The results show that 2–3 years, 4–5 years, 8–9 years and 15–18 years of precipitation cycles in the two tributaries; runoff cycles of 2–3 years, 8–9 years, 14–15 years and 18 years; and sediment transport cycles of 2–3 years, 8 years, 12–15 years, and 19 years present in Jiaojiang River Basin. The annual precipitation, annual runoff and annual sediment transport of the tributaries Yongan River and Shifeng River had no significant changes, and the annual sediment transport of Yongan River decreased by 28% in the past 63 years from 1957 to 2021. The contribution rate of human activities to the decrease of sediment transport in Yongan River was 86.5%–98.7%, and that in Shifengxi was 50.3%–83.2%. In addition, reservoir construction played a very good role as a buffer. Significant changes in land use/cover reduced the soil erosion in Jiaojiang River Basin with less sediment generation. The vegetation coverage in watersheds of the two tributaries was gradually increasing, which reduced the sediment yield in the watersheds to some extents.
-
Keywords:
- Jiaojiang River /
- water and sediment change /
- human activity
-
-
References
[1] CHEN Z, LI J, SHEN H, et al. Yangtze River of China: historical analysis of discharge variability and sediment flux [J]. Geomorphology, 2001, 41: 77–91. [2] 毕乃双,杨作升,王厚杰,等. 黄河调水调沙期间黄河入海水沙的扩散与通量[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2010,30(2):27-34. [3] 潘扎荣,阮晓红,朱愿福,等. 近50年来淮河干流径流演变规律分析[J]. 水土保持学报,2013,27(1):51-55,59. [4] 郭巧玲,陈新华,窦春锋,等. 近60年来窟野河全流域年径流变化及其影响因素分析研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2016,30(3):90-95. [5] 刘建梅. 韩江下游径流周期变化特征的小波分析[J]. 广东水利水电,2007(1):59-62. [6] 夏库热·塔依尔,海米提·依米提,麦麦提吐尔逊·艾则孜,等. 基于小波分析的开都河径流变化周期研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2014,21(1):142-146,151. [7] 王云辉,曾国熙,张正康. 浙江省水文特性分析[J]. 水文,2009,29(4):79-82. [8] 杨俊琦. 仙居县永安溪环境保护的现状及对策[J]. 科技信息,2009(3):780,766. [9] 张卫平. 从天台县始丰溪流域治理谈山溪性河道整治的技术措施[J]. 浙江水利科技,2001(2):43-44. [10] 冷疏影,冯仁国,李锐,等. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持科学重点研究领域与问题[J]. 水土保持学报,2004,18(1):1-6,26. [11] 丁晶, 邓育仁. 随机水文学[M]. 成都: 成都科技大学出版社. 1988: 41-121. [12] 马进荣,郭雅琼,邹国良. 椒江控导工程引起的水沙特征变化分析[J]. 人民长江,2013,44(21):85-89. [13] 陈仁哲,陆莎莎,蔡廷禄,等. 椒江入海水沙通量的变化规律[J]. 泥沙研究,2016(6):25-31. [14] 李伯根,王才洪,周鸿权,等. 近70a来椒江河口河床冲淤调整机理[J]. 海洋学报(中文版),2009,31(5):89-100. [15] 倪敏. 近50年来人类活动对椒江河口河床演变影响[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2012. [16] YE X C,ZHANG Q,LIU J,et al. Distinguishing the relative impacts of climate change and human activities on variation of streamflow in the Poyang Lake catchment,China[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2013,494:83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.036 [17] 翟秋敏,张文佳,安宁,等. 基于M-K、小波和R/S方法的豫南地区气候变化的多时间尺度分析[J]. 河南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,47(5):532-543. [18] 丁瑞强,王式功,尚可政,等. 近45a我国沙尘暴和扬沙天气变化趋势和突变分析[J]. 中国沙漠,2003,23(3):100-104. [19] RAN L,WANG S,FAN X. Channel change at Toudaoguai Station and its responses to the operation of upstream reservoirs in the upper Yellow River[J]. 地理学报(英文版),2010,20(2):231-247. [20] 穆兴民,张秀勤,高鹏,等. 双累积曲线方法理论及在水文气象领域应用中应注意的问题[J]. 水文,2010,30(4):47-51. [21] 王随继,闫云霞,颜明,等. 皇甫川流域降水和人类活动对径流量变化的贡献率分析:累积量斜率变化率比较方法的提出及应用[J]. 地理学报,2012,67(3):388-397. [22] 赵宗慈,王绍武. 近百年我国旱涝演变的周期性[J]. 气象,1979(1):19-22. [23] 余训锋,马大玮,魏琳. 改进周期图法功率谱估计中的窗函数仿真分析[J]. 计算机仿真,2008,25(3):111-114. [24] 王红瑞,叶乐天,刘昌明,等. 水文序列小波周期分析中存在的问题及改进方式[J]. 自然科学进展,2006,16(8):1002-1008. [25] WANG S J,YAN Y X,YAN M,et al. Quantitative estimation of the impact of precipitation and human activities on runoff change of the Huangfuchuan River Basin[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2012,22(5):906-918. doi: 10.1007/s11442-012-0972-8 [26] 郭鹏,陈晓玲,刘影. 鄱阳湖湖口、外洲、梅港三站水沙变化及趋势分析(1955—2001年)[J]. 湖泊科学,2006,18(5):458-463. [27] 陈涛,牛瑞卿,李平湘,等. 密云水库流域植被覆盖度变化对输沙量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2010,19(1):152-159. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2010.01.031 -
Access History
Figures(17)
Tables(6)
Export File
Citation
HAN Mingxing, YIN Ping, CHU Zhongxin, TIAN Yuan, CAO Ke, LI Meina, GUANG Xia, GAO Bin, ZHANG Xu, TIAN Yuqing, HAN Huihui. Characteristics and influencing factors of water and sediment changes in Jiaojiang River Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2022, 38(12): 26-39. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.168
Format
Content
DownLoad:
-
Figure 1.
Location of study area
-
Figure 2.
Interannual changes of precipitation, runoff, and sediment transportation in Yonganxi and Shifengxi
-
Figure 3.
The M-K test curves at abrupt change point of runoff and sediment transport in Yongan River and Shifeng River
-
Figure 4.
Sliding t test on the runoff and sediment transport for Yongan River （a） and Shifeng River （b）
-
Figure 5.
The cumulative curve of runoff and sediment transport anomaly in Yongan River （a） and Shifeng River （b）
-
Figure 6.
Double-cumulative scatter points of precipitation vs runoff and precipitation vs sediment transport for Yongan River and Shifeng River
-
Figure 7.
The real part of the wavelet coefficient of precipitation in Yongan River （a）; wavelet square difference diagram （b）; real part process lines of characteristic time scale wavelet （c, d, e）
-
Figure 8.
The real part of the wavelet coefficient of runoff in Yongan River （a）; wavelet square difference diagram （b）; real part process lines of characteristic time scale wavelet （c, d, e）
-
Figure 9.
The real part of the wavelet coefficient of Sediment transport in Yonganxi （a）; Wavelet square difference diagram （b）; Real part progress lines of characteristic time scale Wavelet （c, d, e）
-
Figure 10.
The real part of the wavelet coefficient of precipitation in Shifeng River （a）; wavelet square difference （b）; and the real part progress lines of characteristic time-scale wavelet （c, d, e）
-
Figure 11.
The real part of the wavelet coefficient of runoff in Shifeng River （a）; wavelet square difference diagram （b）; the real part progress lines of characteristic time-scale wavelet （c, d, e）
-
Figure 12.
The real part of the wavelet coefficient of sediment transport in Shifeng River （a）; wavelet square difference diagram （b）; the real part progress lines of characteristic time-scale wavelet （c, d, e）
-
Figure 13.
Power spectrum curves of precipitation （a）, runoff （b） and sediment transport （C） in Yongan River; and those in Shifeng River in precipitation （d）, runoff （e） and sediment transport （f）
-
Figure 14.
Distribution of monthly runoff before and after the construction of Xiaan Reservoir
-
Figure 15.
Land use/cover change in Yongan River Basin （1995–2020）
-
Figure 16.
land use/cover change in Shifeng River Basin （1995–2020）
-
Figure 17.
Changes of vegetation coverage in watersheds of Yongan and Shifeng Rivers