Suitability evaluation of CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in the East China Sea Shelf Basin

KE Xing; CHEN Jianwen; GONG Jianming; YANG Chuansheng; YANG Changqing; XIE Mingying; WANG Jianqiang; YUAN Yong

doi:10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.156

2023 Vol. 39, No. 7

Article Contents

Article navigation > Marine Geology Frontiers > 2023 > 39(7): 1-12

Next Article Previous Article

KE Xing, CHEN Jianwen, GONG Jianming, YANG Chuansheng, YANG Changqing, XIE Mingying, WANG Jianqiang, YUAN Yong. Suitability evaluation of CO2 sequestration in the East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(7): 1-12. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.156

Citation:

KE Xing, CHEN Jianwen, GONG Jianming, YANG Chuansheng, YANG Changqing, XIE Mingying, WANG Jianqiang, YUAN Yong. Suitability evaluation of CO₂ sequestration in the East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(7): 1-12. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.156

Suitability evaluation of CO₂ sequestration in the East China Sea Shelf Basin

1.
School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
2.
Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources, Laoshan Laboratory, Qingdao 266237, China
3.
Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, China Geological Survey, Qingdao 266237, China
4.
College of Oceanography, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China
5.
Shenzhen Branch of CNOOC(China) Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China

More Information

Corresponding author: CHEN Jianwen, jwchen2012@126.com

Received Date: 16 May 2022

Accepted Date: 21 March 2023

Publish Date: 28 July 2023

Abstract

Abstract

Excessive greenhouse gas emissions have caused obvious global climate change and many secondary disasters. CO₂ capture and sequestration technology came into being. There are many CO₂ emission sources along the coast of the East China Sea, but the land basin area is small, which cannot meet the needs of huge amount of CO₂ storage. The continental shelf basin of the East China Sea ranks the third in the suitability of carbon sequestration in China's offshore basins, with a wide area and good sealing. On this basis, the suitability of basin level carbon sequestration in the East China Sea Shelf Basin was evaluated. Combined with expert opinions and available research results in analytic hierarchy. According to the relevant geological data of each secondary structural unit in the basin, the suitability evaluation index system and index weight were established by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, in which each evaluation index of each unit is scored according to the evaluation index grading, and the comprehensive suitability score is calculated by combining the weight. After comprehensively considering the carbon storage capacity, sealing, and operability, the evaluation results show that the carbon storage suitability is better in the eastern depression than that in the western depression, and the central uplift is the poorest. Among them, the Taipei Depression is the best unit in comprehensive suitability of carbon storage in the basin, which can be used as a priority experimental storage area.
- East China Sea shelf Basin /
- carbon sequestration in sea area /
- suitability evaluation /
- Taipei Depression

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	焦丽杰. 我国的碳排放现状和实现“双碳”目标的挑战[J]. 中国总会计师,2021(6):38-39. Google Scholar
[2]	中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室. 中国应对气候变化的政策与行动（2011）[EB/OL]. （2011-11-22）[2022-04-28]. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-11/22/content_2000047.htm. Google Scholar
[3]	卞相珊. 从国际气候谈判看中国低碳经济转型[J]. 政法论丛,2011(3):19-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6274.2011.03.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	李波. 应对气候变化的有效途径:二氧化碳捕集与封存[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(S1):517-520. Google Scholar
[5]	Carbon capture journal Group. The global status of CCS 2014[J]. Carbon Capture Journal,2015(43):6-8. Google Scholar
[6]	HOLLOWAY S. An overview of the underground disposal of carbon dioxide[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,1997,38(S1):193-198. Google Scholar
[7]	ORR F M. Storage of carbon dioxide in geologic formations[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology,2004,56(9):90-97. doi: 10.2118/88842-JPT CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	PECKHAM J. Global CCS institute:EU falling behind on carbon capture and storage[J]. Gasification News,2014,17(4):13-14. Google Scholar
[9]	杨红,赵习森,康宇龙,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地CO₂地质封存适宜性与潜力评价[J]. 气候变化研究进展,2019,15(1):95-102. Google Scholar
[10]	张冰,梁凯强,王维波,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地深部咸水层CO₂有效地质封存潜力评价[J]. 非常规油气,2019,6(3):15-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-8471.2019.03.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[11]	何佳林,师庆三,董海海,等. 新疆准东油田各区块CO2地质封存潜力评估[J]. 新疆大学学报(自然科学版),2018,35(4):528-531. Google Scholar
[12]	李玮,师庆三,董海海,等. 低渗透油藏二氧化碳混相驱注采方式研究:以克拉玛依油田X区克下组低渗透油藏为例[J]. 中国地质,2022,49(2):485-495. Google Scholar
[13]	汪传胜,田蓉,季峻峰,等. 苏北盆地油田封存二氧化碳潜力初探[J]. 高校地质学报,2012,18(2):225-231. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2012.02.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	孙亮,陈文颖. 中国陆上油藏CO₂封存潜力评估[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(6):76-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.06.013 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	张贤,李阳,马乔,等. 中国碳捕集利用与封存技术发展研究[J]. 中国工程科学,2021,23(6):70-80. Google Scholar
[16]	郭建强,张森琦. 深部咸水层CO₂地质储存工程场地选址技术方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(4):1084-1091. Google Scholar
[17]	贾小丰,张杨,张徽,等. 中国二氧化碳地质储存目标靶区筛选技术方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(4):1314-1326. Google Scholar
[18]	刘桂臻,李琦. 气候变化背景下二氧化碳地质封存的盆地级选址评价方法[J]. 气候变化研究快报,2014,3(1):13-19. Google Scholar
[19]	MICHAEL K,ARNOT M,COOK P,et al. CO₂ storage in saline aquifers I-Current state of scientific knowledge[J]. Energy Procedia,2009,1:3197-3204. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.103 CrossRef Google Scholar
[20]	GRATALOUP S,BONIJOLY D,BROSSE E,et al. A site selection methodology for CO₂ underground storage in deep saline aquifers:case of the Paris Basin[J]. Energy Procedia,2009,1:2929-2936. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.068 CrossRef Google Scholar
[21]	KOVSCEK A R. Screening criteria for CO₂ storage in oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology,2002,20(7/8):841-866. Google Scholar
[22]	MYER L R , BENSON S M , BYRER C , et al. The GEO-SEQ project: a status report[C]. Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 6th International Conference, 2003: 1625-1628. Google Scholar
[23]	刘廷,马鑫,刁玉杰,等. 国内外CO₂地质封存潜力评价方法研究现状[J]. 中国地质调查,2021,8(4):101-108. Google Scholar
[24]	张森琦, 郭建强. 中国二氧化碳地质储存地质基础及场地地质评价[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011. Google Scholar
[25]	WEI N,LI X C,WANG Y,et al. A preliminary sub-basin scale evaluation framework of site suitability for onshore aquifer-based CO₂ storage in China[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2013(12):231-246. Google Scholar
[26]	中国21世纪议程管理中心, 中国地质调查局水文地质环境地质调查中心. 中国二氧化碳地质封存选址指南研究[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2012. Google Scholar
[27]	范基姣,贾小丰,张森琦,等. CO₂地质储存潜力与适宜性评价方法及初步评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2011,38(6):108-112. Google Scholar
[28]	霍传林. 中国近海二氧化碳海底封存潜力评估和封存区域研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2014. Google Scholar
[29]	周泽兴. 火电厂排放CO₂的分离回收和固定技术的研究开发现状[J]. 环境工程学报,1993(1):56-73. Google Scholar
[30]	匡建超,王众,霍志磊. 中国二氧化碳捕捉与封存(CCS)技术早期实施方案构建及评价研究[J]. 中外能源,2012,17(12):17-23. Google Scholar
[31]	张国华,张建培. 东海陆架盆地构造反转特征及成因机制探讨[J]. 地学前缘,2015,22(1):260-271. Google Scholar
[32]	索艳慧,李三忠,戴黎明,等. 东海陆架盆地构造单元划分与特征[J]. 海地质与第四纪地质,2010,30(6):49-58. Google Scholar
[33]	曾久岭, 王常青, 席敏红. 东海区域地质构造单元划分及地质结构特征[C]//第五次东海石油地质研讨会论文集. 2004. Google Scholar
[34]	冯晓杰,蔡东升. 东海陆架盆地中新生代构造演化对烃源岩分布的控制作用[J]. 中国海上油气(工程),2006,18(6):372-375. Google Scholar
[35]	冯晓杰, 蔡东升. 东海陆架盆地中新生代构造演化及其对油气分布的控制作用[C]//中国油气勘探潜力及可持续发展论文集. 第二届中国石油地质年会, 2006. Google Scholar
[36]	刘斌. 利用重、磁异常研究东海陆架盆地的断裂构造[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2010. Google Scholar
[37]	BASAVA-REDDI L , GORECKI C , WILDGUST N . Development of storage coefficients for carbon dioxide storage in deep saline formations[C]//Second EAGE CO₂ Geological Storage Workshop 2010. 2010. Google Scholar
[38]	郑长远,白刚刚,师延霞,等. 西宁盆地级(D级) CO₂地质储存区域适宜性研究[J]. 青海大学学报(自然科学版),2016,34(4):1-8. Google Scholar
[39]	中华人民共和国能源部. 油气储层评价方法 SY/T 6285—1997[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1998. Google Scholar
[40]	中华人民共和国地震局. 工程场地地震安全性评价 GB 17741—2005[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2005. Google Scholar
[41]	陈建文,梁杰,张银国,等. 中国海域油气资源潜力分析与黄东海海域油气资源调查进展[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2019,39(6):1-29. Google Scholar
[42]	杨传胜,杨长清,李刚,等. 东海陆架盆地中—新生界油气勘探研究进展与前景分析[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2018,38(2):136-147. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2018.02.014 CrossRef Google Scholar
[43]	杨长清,韩宝富,杨艳秋,等. 东海陆架盆地中生界油气调查进展与面临的挑战[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2017,33(4):1-8. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2017.04001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[44]	金春爽,乔德武,须雪豪,等. 东海陆架盆地南部油气资源前景与选区[J]. 中国地质,2015,42(5):1601-1609. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2015.05.027 CrossRef Google Scholar
[45]	姜亮. 东海陆架盆地油气资源勘探现状及含油气远景[J]. 中国海上油气(地质),2003,17(1):5. Google Scholar
[46]	蔡乾忠. 中国海域油气地质学[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2005. Google Scholar
[47]	姜亮, 田海芹, 马玉新, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷含油气系统及目标评价[M]. 东营: 石油大学出版社, 2000. Google Scholar
[48]	BACHU S,ADAMS J J. Sequestration of CO₂ in geological media in response to climate change:capacity of deep saline aquifers to sequester CO₂ in solution[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2003,44(20):3151-3175. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00101-8 CrossRef Google Scholar
[49]	BACHU S,SHAW J. Evaluation of the CO₂ sequestration capacity in Alberta's oil and gas reservoirs at depletion and the effect of underlying aquifers[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2003,42(9):51-61. Google Scholar
[50]	杨国强,苏小四,杜尚海,等. 松辽盆地CO₂地质储存适宜性评价[J]. 地球学报,2011,32(5):570-580. Google Scholar