| Qingdao Institute of marine geology, China Geological Survey | Host |
| Citation: |
SHI Yunhua, LIU Daoli, ZHANG Xingyu, XU Yingjing, WEI Xuwang, JIANG Xiuping. Velocity modeling under joint constraint of multiple structural attributes: a case study of Enping Sag in Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(4): 85-90. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.055
|
Velocity modeling under joint constraint of multiple structural attributes: a case study of Enping Sag in Pearl River Mouth Basin
-
Abstract
High precision velocity modeling in complex fault block area is an effective method to solve the problem of fault shadow in imaging profile. We developed a velocity modeling method based on the joint constraints of multiple structural attributes, including horizon, fault, and dip for the structural region A in the Enping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin, South China Sea. In the method, the initial velocity model is established based on existing drilling data and available geological knowledge, and then the joint constraints of structural attributes reflecting fault characteristics are added into the tomographic inversion. Finally, the refined velocity model can be obtained iteratively. It can retain more accurately the velocity difference between the two sides of the fault, and more consistent with the actual stratigraphic units. The seismic depth migration imaging processing based on the velocity model shows that the imaging of the fault shadow area in the imaging section is more continuous, the breakpoint is clear, and the imaging quality is obviously better than the old data.
-
-
References
[1] FAGIN S. The fault shadow problem:its nature and elimination[J]. The Leading Edge,1996,15(9):1005-1013. doi: 10.1190/1.1437403 [2] RAJASEKARAN S,MCMECHAN G A. Prestack processing of land data with complex tomography[J]. Geophysics,1995,60(6):1875-1886. doi: 10.1190/1.1443919 [3] 李振春. 地震叠前成像理论与方法[M]. 东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2011: 98-170. [4] 王延光,尚新民,赵胜天,等. 山前带联合层析反演地震成像[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2021,56(4):782-791. doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2021.04.011 [5] 谢春,刘玉柱,董良国,等. 基于声波方程的有限频伴随状态法初至波旅行时层析[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2015,50(2):274-282. doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2015.02.011 [6] 徐嘉亮,张冰,王维红,等. 基于一步法层析速度建模方法建立[J]. 地球物理学报,2021,64(4):1412-1418. doi: 10.6038/cjg2021O0372 [7] 谷延斌,张旭东,姚征,等. 网格层析和高斯束偏移在深度域速度建模中的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2018,53(增刊1):112-116. doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2018.S1.019 [8] 董良国,张建明,韩佩恩. 改进的伴随状态法初至波走时层析成像方法[J]. 地球物理学报,2021,64(3):982-992. doi: 10.6038/cjg2021O0368 [9] 张志军. 基于高斯射线束的叠前深度偏移在断裂带成像中的应用:以渤海海域辽东湾地区为例[J]. 断块油气田,2015,22(6):696-701. [10] 李慧,成德安,金婧. 网格层析成像速度建模方法与应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2013,48(增刊1):12-16. doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2013.s1.003 [11] 万弘,杨勤勇,蔡杰雄,等. 地质构造约束高斯束层析反演方法与应用[J]. 石油物探,2017,56(5):707-717. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2017.05.011 [12] 王新领,张健男,赵明,等. 基于断层正则化的网格层析反演在深度域速度场建模中的应用[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2019,49(6):79-85. [13] 彭海龙,邓勇,赫建伟,等. 基于断层和层位约束的3D速度建模方法在消除断层阴影中的应用研究[J]. 地球物理学进展,2017,32(6):2520-2526. doi: 10.6038/pg20170632 [14] 孙成禹. 地震资料的双约束频谱补偿方法[J]. 石油物探,2000,39(1):35-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2000.01.005 [15] 孙夕平,张研,张永清,等. 地震拓频技术在薄层油藏开发动态分析中的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2010,45(5):695-699. doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2010.05.021 [16] 吴大奎,吴宗蔚,伍翊嘉. 叠后地震资料井控高分辨率处理新方法[J]. 天然气工业,2019,39(11):36-43. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.11.005 [17] 姜岩,程国,王元波,等. 大庆长垣油田断层阴影地震正演模拟及校正方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2019,54(2):320-329. doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2019.02.010 [18] 魏山力. 基于地震资料的陆相湖盆“源-渠-汇”沉积体系分析:以珠江口盆地开平凹陷文昌组长轴沉积体系为例[J]. 断块油气田,2016,23(4):414-418. [19] 陈少平,王华,刘丽芳,等. 断裂时空差异性演化及其对生烃凹陷形成的控制:以珠江口盆地珠三坳陷为例[J]. 断块油气田,2015,22(1):1-6. [20] 许新明. 基于断层岩泥质质量分数预测的断层侧向封闭性评价[J]. 断块油气田,2014,21(5):574-578. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt201405007 -
Access History
Figures(10)
Export File
Citation
SHI Yunhua, LIU Daoli, ZHANG Xingyu, XU Yingjing, WEI Xuwang, JIANG Xiuping. Velocity modeling under joint constraint of multiple structural attributes: a case study of Enping Sag in Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(4): 85-90. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.055
Format
Content
DownLoad:
-
Figure 1.
The phenomenon of fault shadow in the study area
-
Figure 2.
The process of velocity modeling under the constraints of multiple structural attributes
-
Figure 3.
The processing steps for the seismic data
-
Figure 4.
Logging speed vs RMS speed joint simulation
-
Figure 5.
The constraint patterns of horizons and faults
-
Figure 6.
The initial velocity model
-
Figure 7.
The structural attributes
-
Figure 8.
Comparison in speed before and after update
-
Figure 9.
Gathers contrast of fault shadows
-
Figure 10.
Comparison of sections before and after imaging of fault-controlled modeling