2022 Vol. 38, No. 9
Article Contents

JU Dong, QIU Yan, HUANG Wenkai, DU Wenbo. Activity characteristics of main sag-controlling faults and Cenozoic initial crustal rifting in the South China Sea[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2022, 38(9): 59-70. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.224
Citation: JU Dong, QIU Yan, HUANG Wenkai, DU Wenbo. Activity characteristics of main sag-controlling faults and Cenozoic initial crustal rifting in the South China Sea[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2022, 38(9): 59-70. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.224

Activity characteristics of main sag-controlling faults and Cenozoic initial crustal rifting in the South China Sea

More Information
  • Based on the data interpretation on two long seismic transections across the southern and northern continental margins of the South China Sea, we analyzed the activity characteristics of the main sag-controlling faults in the South China Sea and the initial tensile fracture characteristics of the Cenozoic crust. Most of the faults began to develop and move strongly during the Cenozoic period of tensile fracture. The sag-controlling faults are usually developed at the sag boundary, also known as the sag-controlling boundary faults. In the early stage, the most sag-controlling faults are characteristic of rotation and detachment of fault blocks and the formation of listric faults. Most of the main sag-controlling faults in the northern continental margin are episodic faults in characteristics, and the initial activity time is mainly from the Early Eocene to Late Oligocene. In particular, the initial activity time of faults in the eastern part is the Early Eocene or earlier, and that in the western part is the Middle Eocene or later. In the southern continental margin of the South China Sea, the initial activity time of sag-controlling faults is later than that in the northern continental margin, mainly concentrated in the Eocene or Late Eocene. It can be seen that the initial activity time of the Cenozoic crustal tension in the South China Sea presents the characteristics of "early in the east and late in the west, and early in the north and late in the south". In addition, some of the sag-controlling faults continued or began to move during the drifting period of the South China Sea, and a few faults reactivated in the Miocene.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 朱晨曦,唐武,尹永康,等. 南海南部及陆缘区的区域断裂体系特征及其形成机制[J]. 世界地质,2019,38(3):708-720. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2019.03.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] 卢丽娟,蔡周荣,黄强太,等. 南海及邻区新构造运动表现特征及其主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(1):206-217.

    Google Scholar

    [3] HAYES D E,NISSEN S S,BUHL P,et al. Throughgoing crustal faults along the northern margin of the South China Sea and their role in crustal extension[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1995,100(B11):22435-22446. doi: 10.1029/95JB01867

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] 邱燕,曾维军,李唐根. 南海中、南部断裂体系及其构造意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2005,29(2):166-175. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2005.02.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] 鲁宝亮,王璞珺,张功成,等. 南海区域断裂特征及其基底构造格局[J]. 地球物理学进展,2015,30(4):1544-1553. doi: 10.6038/pg20150408

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] 徐子英,汪俊,高红芳,等. 南海海盆中南—礼乐断裂带研究进展[J]. 热带海洋学报,2019,38(2):86-94.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 杜文波,邱燕,黄文凯,等. 南海西缘曾母西断裂构造特征及其对盆地沉积发育的控制作用[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2021,41(2):100-108.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 刘雨晴,吴智平,程燕君,等. 南海北缘古近纪裂陷结构时空差异及控制因素:以珠江口盆地为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2019,48(2):367-376.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 张远泽,漆家福,吴景富. 南海北部新生代盆地断裂系统及构造动力学影响因素[J]. 地球科学,2019,44(2):603-625.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 徐子英,汪俊,高红芳,等. 中沙地块南部断裂发育特征及其成因机制[J]. 中国地质,2020,47(5):1438-1446.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 杜文波,黄文凯,朱红涛,等. 台湾海峡西部海域沉积体系、地层架构与油气勘探前景[J]. 中国地质,2020,47(5):1542-1553.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 聂鑫,邱燕,PUBELLIER M,等. 南海西南次海盆构造特征及其沉积响应[J]. 中国地质,2020,47(5):1463-1473.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 杜文波,蔡观强,黄文凯,等. 西沙海区新近纪碳酸盐岩台地地震响应特征和控制因素[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2021,37(1):20-30.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 邱燕, 王立飞, 黄文凯, 等. 中国海域中新生代沉积盆地[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2016.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 杨胜雄, 邱燕, 朱本铎. 南海及邻域地质-地球物理系列图(1:2 000 000)[M]. 广州: 中国航海图书出版社, 2013.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 姚伯初. 南海海盆在新生代的构造演化[J]. 南海地质研究,1991(3):9-23.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 刘琴琴,黄传炎,金思丁,等. 福山凹陷美台断层活动特征及其对沉积的控制[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,37(4):51-59.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 张伟忠,查明,韩宏伟,等. 东营凹陷边界断层活动性与沉积演化耦合关系的量化表征[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(4):18-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2017.04.003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] 王观宏,甘华军,赵忠新,等. 南堡凹陷高柳断层活动特征及其对沉积的控制[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2018,42(2):51-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2018.02.006

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] 占华旺,蔡国富,张志伟,等. 南海北缘古近纪断裂活动规律及控盆特征:以阳江东凹为例[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2021,45(1):20-39.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 龚再升. 南海北部大陆边缘盆地分析与油气聚集[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1997.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 朱伟林. 南海北部大陆边缘盆地天然气地质[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2007.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 解习农,任建业,王振峰,等. 南海大陆边缘盆地构造演化差异性及其与南海扩张耦合关系[J]. 地学前缘,2015,22(1):77-87.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(12)

Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(1277) PDF downloads(199) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint