CAUSE OF THE PARTIAL MISSING OF GRAPTOLITE ZONES IN WUFENG AND KAOCHIAPIEN FORMATIONS OF WELL GD-1, CHAOHU AREA, LOWER YANGTZE REGION

WANG Wenjuan; CHEN Jianwen; LEI Baohua; ZHANG Yinguo

doi:10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.032

2021 Vol. 37, No. 4

Article Contents

Article navigation > Marine Geology Frontiers > 2021 > 37(4): 61-67

Next Article Previous Article

WANG Wenjuan, CHEN Jianwen, LEI Baohua, ZHANG Yinguo. CAUSE OF THE PARTIAL MISSING OF GRAPTOLITE ZONES IN WUFENG AND KAOCHIAPIEN FORMATIONS OF WELL GD-1, CHAOHU AREA, LOWER YANGTZE REGION[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2021, 37(4): 61-67. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.032

Citation:

WANG Wenjuan, CHEN Jianwen, LEI Baohua, ZHANG Yinguo. CAUSE OF THE PARTIAL MISSING OF GRAPTOLITE ZONES IN WUFENG AND KAOCHIAPIEN FORMATIONS OF WELL GD-1, CHAOHU AREA, LOWER YANGTZE REGION[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2021, 37(4): 61-67. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.032

CAUSE OF THE PARTIAL MISSING OF GRAPTOLITE ZONES IN WUFENG AND KAOCHIAPIEN FORMATIONS OF WELL GD-1, CHAOHU AREA, LOWER YANGTZE REGION

1.
Qingdao Institute of Marine and Geology, CGS, Qingdao 266071, China
2.
Laboratory for Mineral Resources, Qingdao National Laboratory forMarine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China
3.
College of Marine Geoscience, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
4.
Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266510, China
5.
Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
6.
China University of Petroleum (Huadong), Qingdao 266590, China

More Information

Corresponding author: CHEN Jianwen, jwchen2012@126.com

Received Date: 08 February 2021

Publish Date: 28 April 2021

Abstract

Abstract

The well GD-1, located in Gushan, Chaohu of Anhui Province, is a well initiated from the Kaochiapien Formation. From 770.5 m to 1234.5 m, there occur black graptolite shale of the Kaochiapien Formation and Wufeng Formation. Graptolite biostratigraphy reveals that there are four graptolite biozones in an ascending order, say Dicellograptus complexus-Paraorthograptus pacificus (WF2-WF3) zones, Akidograptus ascensus (LM2?) zone, Coronograptus cyphus (LM5) and Demirastrites triangulatus (LM6) zones (No apical in LM6). Compared with the Wufeng and Lungmachi (Kaochiapien) Formations in the Yangtze Region, the graptolite biozones of Metabolograptus extraordinarius-Metabolograptus persculptus (WF4-LM1) zones and Parakidograptus acuminatus-Cystograptus vesiculosus(LM3-LM4)zones are lacking in the well GD-1, but found in other holes nearby. It is suspected that the WF4-LM1 zones may not have been deposited in the area surrounding the well GD-1 due to the expansion of ‘Jiangnan Oldland’. The fact that the LM3-LM4 zones can be seen in the adjacent area but absence in well GD-1 may suggest the influence of the decollement structure, which also leads to the thinning of the black shale. The LM5 and LM6 zones are relatively thicker than the others in the Yangtze region, possibly due to the strata repetition affected by the thrust nappe tectonics.
- black shale /
- Wufeng Formation /
- Kaochiapien Formation /
- graptolite biostratigraphy /
- Lower Yangtze Region.

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	陈旭,樊隽轩,张元动,等. 五峰组及龙马溪组黑色页岩在扬子覆盖区内的划分与圈定[J]. 地层学杂志,2015,39(4):351-358. Google Scholar
[2]	张金川,杨超,陈前,等. 中国潜质页岩形成和分布[J]. 地学前缘,2016,23(1):74-86. Google Scholar
[3]	贾东, 胡文瑄, 姚素平, 等. 江苏省下志留统黑色页岩浅井钻探及其页岩气潜力分析[J]. 2016, 2(1): 127-137. Google Scholar
[4]	邹才能,赵群,丛连铸,等. 中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(1):1-14. Google Scholar
[5]	梁榜,李继庆,郑爱维,等. 涪陵页岩气田水平井开发效果评价[J]. 天然气地球科学,2018,29(2):289-295. Google Scholar
[6]	谢军. 长宁—威远国家级页岩气示范区建设实践与成效[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(2):1-7. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.02.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	陈旭,樊隽轩,王文卉,等. 黔渝地区志留系龙马溪组黑色笔石页岩的阶段性渐进展布模式[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2017,47(6):720-732. Google Scholar
[8]	陈清,樊隽轩,张琳娜,等. 下扬子区奥陶纪晚期古地理演变及华南“台-坡-盆”格局的打破[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2018,48(6):767-777. Google Scholar
[9]	许杰. 长江下游之笔石化石[M]. 国立中央研究院地质研究所专刊(甲种第四号), 1934: 1-108. Google Scholar
[10]	潘江. 宁镇山脉古生代地层的新认识[J]. 地质学报,1956,36(1):1-24. Google Scholar
[11]	朱兆玲,许汉奎,陈旭,等. 安徽滁县、全椒及南京、六合地区早古生代地层[J]. 中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所丛刊,1984(7):311-338. Google Scholar
[12]	李积金. 安徽南部下志留统笔石[J]. 南京:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所丛刊,1999(14):70-157. Google Scholar
[13]	WANG W H,HU W X,CHEN Q,et al. Temporal and spatial distribution of Ordovician–Silurian boundary black Graptolitic shales on the Lower Yangtze Platform[J]. Palaeoworld,2017,26:444-455. doi: 10.1016/j.palwor.2016.11.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	熊强青,王中鹏,张娣,等. 下扬子巢湖地区皖含地1井五峰组-高家边组下段生物地层[J]. 地层学杂志,2020,44(1):46-55. Google Scholar
[15]	GRADSTEIN F M, OGG J G, SCHMITZ M D, et al. Geologic Time Scale[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2020: 1-1390. Google Scholar
[16]	陈旭, 王文娟. 巢湖旗鼓村鼓地1井五峰组和高家边组黑色页岩的地层划分与对比[R]. 南京: 中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所, 2018: 1-8. Google Scholar
[17]	ŠTORCH P,MITCHELL C E,FINNEY S C,et al. Uppermost Ordovician (upper Katain-Hirnantian) graptolites of north-central Nevada,U. S. A[J]. Bulletin of Geosciences,2011,86(2):301-368. Google Scholar
[18]	LOXTON J D. Graptolite diversity and community changes surrounding the late Ordovician mass extinction: high resolution data from the blackstone river Yukon[D]. Halifax Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University. 2017: 1-590. Google Scholar
[19]	CHEN X,FAN J X,MELCHIN M J,et al. Hirnantain (latest Ordovician) Graptolites from the Yangtze region,China[J]. Palaeontology,2005,48(2):235-280. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2005.00453.x CrossRef Google Scholar
[20]	方一亭, 梁诗经, 张大良, 等. 江西省武宁县梨树窝组及其笔[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 1990: 1-155. Google Scholar
[21]	ZALASIEWICZ J A,TALOR L,RUSHTON A W A,et al. Graptolites in British stratigraphy[J]. Geological Magazine,2009,146(6):785-850. doi: 10.1017/S0016756809990434 CrossRef Google Scholar
[22]	安徽省地质局区域地质调查队. 安徽笔石化石[M]. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社, 1982: 1-166. Google Scholar
[23]	张娣,于谦,陆俊泽,等. 云南永善-大关地区五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩生物地层划分与沉积环境探讨:以新地2井为例[J]. 地球科学,2020,45(3):739-751. Google Scholar
[24]	罗超,王生兰,石学文,等. 长宁页岩气田宁211井五峰组—龙马溪组生物地层[J]. 地层学杂志,2017,41(2):142-152. Google Scholar
[25]	王红岩,郭伟,梁峰,等. 四川盆地威远页岩气田五峰组和龙马溪组黑色页岩生物地层特征与意义[J]. 地层学杂志,2015,39(3):289-293. Google Scholar
[26]	郭旭升,胡东风,文治东,等. 四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素:以焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 中国地质,2014,41(3):893-901. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2014.03.016 CrossRef Google Scholar
[27]	LIU Z H,ALGEO T J,GUO X S,et al. Paleo-environmental cyclicity in the early Silurian Yangtze Sea(South China):tectonic or glacio-eustatic control?[J]. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology,2017,466:59-76. Google Scholar
[28]	王红岩,郭伟,梁锋,等. 宣汉—巫溪地区五峰组—龙马溪组黑色页岩生物地层特征及分层对比[J]. 天然气工业,2017,37(7):27-33. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2017.07.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[29]	武瑾, 梁锋, 吝文, 等. 渝东北地区巫溪2井五峰组—龙马溪组组页岩气储层及含气性特征. 石油学报[J]. 2017, 38(5): 512-524. Google Scholar
[30]	丁道桂,王东燕,刘运黎. 下扬子地区古生代盆地的改造变形[J]. 地学前缘,2009,16(4):61-73. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2009.04.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
[31]	赵挺,程海生,陆英. 下扬子区中、古生界典型构造样式与油气勘探选区[J]. 复杂油气藏,2010,3(2):8-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4667.2010.02.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[32]	聂海宽,李东晖,姜涛,等. 基于笔石带特征的页岩等时地层测井划分方法及意义[J]. 石油学报,2020,41(3):273-283. doi: 10.7623/syxb202003002 CrossRef Google Scholar