KEY PARAMETERS FOR RESERVE EVALUATION WITH SEC VOLUMETRIC METHOD AND THEIR APPLICATION TO THE XIHU SAG, EAST CHINA SEA

ZHANG Yanzhen; LIU Zhixia; ZHANG Jianpei; HOU Wei; LIU Yang

doi:10.16028/j.1009-2722.2020.185

2021 Vol. 37, No. 5

Article Contents

Article navigation > Marine Geology Frontiers > 2021 > 37(5): 63-70

Next Article Previous Article

ZHANG Yanzhen, LIU Zhixia, ZHANG Jianpei, HOU Wei, LIU Yang. KEY PARAMETERS FOR RESERVE EVALUATION WITH SEC VOLUMETRIC METHOD AND THEIR APPLICATION TO THE XIHU SAG, EAST CHINA SEA[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2021, 37(5): 63-70. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2020.185

Citation:

ZHANG Yanzhen, LIU Zhixia, ZHANG Jianpei, HOU Wei, LIU Yang. KEY PARAMETERS FOR RESERVE EVALUATION WITH SEC VOLUMETRIC METHOD AND THEIR APPLICATION TO THE XIHU SAG, EAST CHINA SEA[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2021, 37(5): 63-70. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2020.185

KEY PARAMETERS FOR RESERVE EVALUATION WITH SEC VOLUMETRIC METHOD AND THEIR APPLICATION TO THE XIHU SAG, EAST CHINA SEA

CNOOC Limited-Shanghai Branch, Shanghai 200335, China

Received Date: 30 November 2020

Publish Date: 20 May 2021

Abstract

Abstract

In recent years, the volume method is widely used in the Xihu Sag of the East China Sea for self-assessment of newly increased reserves and the reserves found in early development stages. The results are different from different researchers due to the difference in key parameters adopted, such as reserve classification, well controlled oil-gas area, net pay etc., used for the calculation. Based on the exploration and development practice in the Xihu Sag, the determination of key parameters of SEC volume method is carefully discussed in this paper. The results suggest that some basic principles must be followed in using SEC volume method, such as reasonable certainty, data reliability, reasonable planning and a development trial over 5 years. In the classification table of reserves, low, medium and high values corresponding to 1P、2P、3P reserves should be selected according to the reliability of parameters such as net pay, effective porosity, saturation and recovery factor, etc. Based on the data from well testing, and the reversely calculated final recoverable reserves, average reserve/production ratio and other technical parameters, the control radius of a gas well for the main producing layers in the Xihu Sag is determined as 420～740 m, while the control radius for oil wells varies in the range of 330～660 m. When determining the net pay of a unit by isoline area trade-off method, full considerations should be given to the same layer of gas (oil) and water, the maximum thickness of oil-gas layer, and the distribution patterns of structures and sand bodies. With the successful application of the method to gas field N-1 in the Xihu Sag, the research results have certain significance for the reserve evaluation of newly added reserve or the oil and gas fields in early development stages.
- volumetric method /
- SEC criteria /
- oil-bearing area /
- net pay /
- Xihu Sag

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	贾承造. 美国SEC 油气储量评估方法[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004: 8. Google Scholar
[2]	赵文智,李建忠,王永祥,等. SEC标准确定证实储量边界的方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2006,33(6):754-758. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2006.06.021 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	王永祥,段晓文,徐小林,等. SEC准则油气证实储量判别标准与评估方法[J]. 石油学报,2016,37(9):1137-1144. Google Scholar
[4]	李冰. SEC标准确定容积法储量计算参数[J]. 石油实验地质,2014,36(3):381-384. Google Scholar
[5]	张玲,魏萍,肖席珍. SEC储量评估特点及影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2011,32(2):293-301. Google Scholar
[6]	刘金水,邹玮,李宁,等. “储保耦合”控藏机制与西湖凹陷大中型油气田勘探实践[J]. 中国海上油气,2019,31(3):11-19. Google Scholar
[7]	周心怀. 西湖凹陷地质认识创新与油气勘探领域突破[J]. 中国海上油气,2020,32(1):1-12. Google Scholar
[8]	US Securities and Exchange Commission. Disclosure by registrants engaged in oil and gas producing activities[S]. Washington, DC: SEC, 2009. Google Scholar
[9]	US Securities and Exchange Commission. Compliance and disclosure interpretations: oil and gas rules[S]. Washington D C: SEC, 2013. Google Scholar
[10]	胡允栋,萧德铭,王永祥. 按SEC标准进行油气证实储量评估的基本原则[J]. 石油学报,2004,25(2):19-24. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2004.02.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[11]	毕海滨,李建忠,张君峰,等. SEC准则证实储量评估中可靠技术应用[J]. 石油学报,2013,34(6):1212-1217. doi: 10.7623/syxb201306025 CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	王庆帅. 可靠技术在南海气田SEC储量评估中的应用[J]. 石油实验地质,2019,41(6):923-930. Google Scholar
[13]	孟海燕,孙秋分,曹崇军. SEC新准则对油气储量评估及披露的影响因素探讨[J]. 石油规划设计,2012,23(2):19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2970.2012.02.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	赵文智,毕海滨. 浅析中国与西方在储量计算中确定有效厚度之差异[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):125-129. Google Scholar
[15]	田敏. 胜利油田新增探明储量SEC评估现状与分析[J]. 岩性油气藏,2017,29(1):97-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.01.012 CrossRef Google Scholar
[16]	邵明记,李洪成,李果年,等. SEC证实储量静态评估方法应用与实践[J]. 吐哈油气,2009,14(4):331-334. Google Scholar
[17]	唐贤君,蒋一鸣,张建培,等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷平北区断陷层断裂特征及其对圈闭的控制[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2019,35(8):34-43. Google Scholar
[18]	蒋一鸣,邹玮,刘金水,等. 东海西湖凹陷中新世末反转背斜构造成因机制:来自基底结构差异的新认识[J]. 地球科学,2020,45(3):968-979. Google Scholar
[19]	张彦振,侯凯文,孙鹏,等. 基于三维定量荧光技术的西湖凹陷储层复杂流体性质快速识别方法[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2020,36(10):76-83. Google Scholar
[20]	秦兰芝,刘金水,李帅,等. 东海西湖凹陷中央反转带花港组锆石特征及物源指示意义[J]. 石油实验地质,2017,39(4):498-504. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201704498 CrossRef Google Scholar
[21]	张建培,徐发,钟韬,等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖组-花港组层序地层模式及沉积演化 Google Scholar J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2012,32(1):35-40. Google Scholar