Optimization of Cation Exchange Capacity Determination in Soil by Hexamminecobalt Trichloride Method

ZHANG Lei; WANG Lei; JIA Zhengxun; FAN Xingtao; GUO Lin

doi:10.15898/j.ykcs.202304240054

2024 Vol. 43, No. 3

Article Contents

Article navigation > Rock and Mineral Analysis > 2024 > 43(3): 509-516

Next Article Previous Article

ZHANG Lei, WANG Lei, JIA Zhengxun, FAN Xingtao, GUO Lin. Optimization of Cation Exchange Capacity Determination in Soil by Hexamminecobalt Trichloride Method[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2024, 43(3): 509-516. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202304240054

Citation:

ZHANG Lei, WANG Lei, JIA Zhengxun, FAN Xingtao, GUO Lin. Optimization of Cation Exchange Capacity Determination in Soil by Hexamminecobalt Trichloride Method[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2024, 43(3): 509-516. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202304240054

Optimization of Cation Exchange Capacity Determination in Soil by Hexamminecobalt Trichloride Method

1.
National Research Center for Geoanalysis, Beijing 100037, China
2.
Hubei Geological Research Laboratory, Wuhan 430034, China

More Information

Corresponding author: GUO Lin, guolno_1@aliyun.com

Received Date: 24 April 2023

Revised Date: 03 January 2024

Accepted Date: 09 March 2024

Publish Date: 31 May 2024

Abstract

Abstract

Compared with the traditional ammonium acetate exchange method and calcium acetate exchange method to determine cation exchange capacity (CEC), hexamminecobalt trichloride method has obvious advantages in the analysis of large quantities of samples. However, the application scope of this method is limited, and the detection results of neutral and alkaline samples are good, but the detection results of acidic samples are as low as 50%. In order to solve these problems, the pH was adjusted to alkaline with 2mol/L sodium hydroxide solution, the CEC value of the sample was significantly improved, and the determination results of both acidic and alkaline samples reached the range of standard values. By drawing the pH adjustment curve, the volume of 2mol/L sodium hydroxide solution was obtained in soil samples with different pH ranges, so as to adjust the pH value of unknown samples and realize the accurate determination of CEC. On the basis of the original method, the pH of the sample was adjusted to alkalinity, and the precision of the optimized method ranged from 1.02% to 3.82% (n=6). After optimization, the application scope of the method is expanded, the precision and accuracy are improved, and the detection efficiency of a large number of samples is effectively improved.
- cation-exchange capacity /
- extraction of hexamminecobalt trichloride /
- spectrophotometry /
- NaOH solution /
- pH value

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	赵莉. 乙酸铵交换法测定土壤阳离子交换量的不确定度评定研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2015, 40(10): 146−149. Google Scholar Zhao L. Uncertainty in determining of cation exchange capacity in soil samples by ammonium acetate exchange method[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2015, 40(10): 146−149. Google Scholar
[2]	康婷, 周春火, 魏宗强, 等. 江西省土壤阳离子交换量区域分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(14): 66−71. Google Scholar Kang T, Zhou C H, Wei Z Q, et al. Regional distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil cation exchange capacity in Jiangxi[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(14): 66−71. Google Scholar
[3]	Ngo D N G, Chuang X Y, Huang C P, et al. Compositional characterization of nine agricultural waste biochars: The relations between alkaline metals and cation exchange capacity with ammonium adsorption capability[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2023(11): 110003. Google Scholar
[4]	Jiang J, Wang Y P, Yu M X, et al. Soil organic matter in important for acid buffering and reducing aluminum leaching from acidic forest soils[J]. Chemical Geology, 2018(501): 86−94. Google Scholar
[5]	Shekofteh H, Ramazani F, Shirani H. Optimal feature selection for predicting soil CEC: Comparing the hybrid of ant colony organization algorithm and adaptive network-based fuzzy system with multiple linear regression[J]. Geoderma, 2017(298): 27−34. Google Scholar
[6]	Zhao X Z T, Arshad M, Li N, et al. Determination of the optimal mathematical model, sample size, digital data and transect spacing to map CEC (cation exchange capacity) in a sugarcane field[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020(173): 105436. Google Scholar
[7]	Emamgholizadeh S, Bazoobandi A, Mohammadi B, et al. Prediction of soil cation exchange capacity using enhanced machine learning approaches in the southern region of the Caspian Sea[J]. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2023(14): 101876. Google Scholar
[8]	Aihemaiti A, Jiang J G, Li D A, et al. The interaction of metal concentrations and soil properties on toxic metal accumulation of native plants in vanadium mining area[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018(222): 216−226. Google Scholar
[9]	Cui X Y, Mao P, Sun S, et al. Phytoremediation of cadmium contaminated soils by Amaranthus hypochondriacus L: The effects of soil properties highlighting cation exchange capacity[J]. Chemosphere, 2021(283): 131067. Google Scholar
[10]	Liddicoat C, Bi P, Waycott M, et al. Ambient soil cation exchange capacity inversely associates with infectious and parasitic disease risk in regional Australia[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018(626): 117−125. Google Scholar
[11]	白志强, 张世熔, 钟钦梅, 等. 四环盆地西缘土壤阳离子交换量的特征及影响因素[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(3): 581−587. Google Scholar Bai Z Q, Zhang S R, Zhong Q M, et al. Characteristics and impact factors of soil cation exchange capacity in western margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Soils, 2020, 52(3): 581−587. Google Scholar
[12]	Chen Y T, Gao S B, Jones E J, et al. Prediction of soil cay content and cation exchange capacity using visible near-infrared spectroscopy, portable X-ray fluorescence, and X-ray diffraction techniques[J]. Environment Science and Technology, 2021, 55(8): 4629−4637. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04130 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	Wan M X, Hu M Y, Qu M K, et al. Rapid estimation of soil cation exchange capacity through sensor data fusion of portable XRF spectrometry and vis-NIR spectroscopy[J]. Geoderma, 2020(363): 114163. Google Scholar
[14]	Renault P, Cazevieille P, Verdier J, et al. Variations in the cation exchange capacity of a ferralsol supplied with vinasse, under changing aeration conditions comparison between CEC measuring methods[J]. Geoderma, 2009(154): 101−110. Google Scholar
[15]	黄英, 白冰, 李洋冰, 等. 三氯化六氨合钴浸提-分光光度法测定泥质砂岩黏土阳离子交换量[J]. 理化检验(化学分册), 2023, 59(2): 232−234. Google Scholar Huang Y, Bai B, Li Y B, et al. Determination of cation exchange capacity of argillaceous sandstone clay by cobalt trichloride leaching-spectrophotometry[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis: Part B (Chemical Analysis), 2023, 59(2): 232−234. Google Scholar
[16]	胡梦颖, 张鹏鹏, 徐进力, 等. CEC前处理系统-凯氏定氮仪快速测定土壤中的阳离子交换量[J]. 物探与化探, 2023, 47(2): 458−463. Google Scholar Hu M Y, Zhang P P, Xu J L, et al. Rapid determination of soil cation exchange capacity using a cation exchange capacity pretreatment system and a Kjeldahl apparatus[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2023, 47(2): 458−463. Google Scholar
[17]	Enang R K, Kips P A, Yerima B P K, et al. Pedotransfer functions for cation exchange capacity estimation in highly weathered soils of the tropical highlands of NW Cameroon[J]. Geoderma Regional, 2022(29): e00514. Google Scholar
[18]	杨利利, 李菲, 陈渝, 等. 分光光度法测定土壤中阳离子交换量的优化改进[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(35): 119−122. Google Scholar Yang L L, Li F, Chen Y, et al. Optimization and improvement of spectrophotometry method to determine cation exchange capacity in soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(35): 119−122. Google Scholar
[19]	侯玉兰, 吴银菊, 胡芳, 等. 全自动淋洗-凯氏定氮法快速测定土壤阳离子交换量[J]. 理化检验(化学分册), 2022, 58(8): 966−969. Google Scholar Hou Y L, Wu Y J, Hu F, et al. Rapid determination of soil cation exchange capacity by automatic leaching—Kjeldahl nitrogen determination method[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis: Part B (Chemical Analysis), 2022, 58(8): 966−969. Google Scholar
[20]	拉毛吉, 王玉功, 张榕. 乙酸铵离心交换法和乙酸钙离心交换法测定土壤阳离子交换量[J]. 中国无机分析化学, 2017, 7(3): 38−41. Google Scholar La M J, Wang Y G, Zhang R. Determination of cation exchange capacity of soil by centrifugal exchange of ammonium and calcium acetates[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Analytical Chemistry, 2017, 7(3): 38−41. Google Scholar
[21]	陈桂华, 范芳, 林芷君. 三氯化六氨合钴浸提-分光光度法测定土壤阳离子交换量[J]. 理化检验(化学分册), 2019, 55(12): 1448−1451. Google Scholar Chen G H, Fan F, Lin Z J. Determination of soil cation exchange capacity by cobalt hexamine trichloride extraction-spectrophotometry[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis: Part B (Chemical Analysis), 2019, 55(12): 1448−1451. Google Scholar
[22]	Purnamasari L, Rostaman T, Widowati L R, et al. Comparison of appropriate cation exchange capacity (CEC) extraction methods for soils from several regions of Indonesia[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 648: 012209. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/648/1/012209 CrossRef Google Scholar
[23]	林清火, 刘海林, 王莉, 等. 碳基土壤调理剂对橡胶园土壤pH和阳离子交换量的影响[J]. 热带农业科学, 2018, 38(12): 1−9. Google Scholar Lin Q H, Liu H L, Wang L, et al. Effect of biochar-based soil conditioner on the soil pH and CEC in rubber plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2018, 38(12): 1−9. Google Scholar
[24]	岳中慧, 岳启建, 龙寿坤, 等. 三氯化六氨合钴法浸提-分光光度法测定土壤中阳离子交换量[J]. 化学分析计量, 2022, 31(4): 55−59. Google Scholar Yue Z H, Yue Q J, Long S K, et al. Determination of cation exchange capacity in soil by spectrophotometry after extraction of hexammonium cobalt trichloride[J]. Chemical Analysis and Meterage, 2022, 31(4): 55−59. Google Scholar
[25]	Kazak E S, Kazak A V. Experimental features of cation exchange capacity determination in organic-rich mudstones[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020(83): 103456. Google Scholar
[26]	Aran D, Maul A, Masfaraud J F. A spectrophotometric measurement of soil cation exchange capacity based on cobaltihexamine chloride absorbance[J]. C. R. Geoscience, 2008(340): 865−871. Google Scholar
[27]	王丽敏, 吴慧, 申立, 等. 分光光度法测定土壤阳离子交换量的方法优化[J]. 环境监控与预警, 2022, 14(2): 49−52, 69. Google Scholar Wang L M, Wu H, Shen L, et al. Method optimization of spectrophotometric determination of cation exchange capacity in soil[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Forewarning, 2022, 14(2): 49−52, 69. Google Scholar
[28]	王俊杰, 辛文涛, 王巧环. 超声浸提-分光光度法测定土壤阳离子交换量[J]. 中国无机分析化学, 2023, 13(6): 562−567. Google Scholar Wang J J, Xin W T, Wang Q H. Determination of soil cation exchange capacity by ultrasonic extraction-spectrophotometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Analytical Chemistry, 2023, 13(6): 562−567. Google Scholar
[29]	刘蓉, 邓茂, 李莹莹, 等. 不同酸碱度土壤阳离子交换量的测定研究[J]. 中国环境监测, 2019, 35(1): 125−130. Google Scholar Liu R, Deng M, Li Y Y, et al. Optimization for the determination of cation exchange capacity in soils with different acidity and alkalinity[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2019, 35(1): 125−130. Google Scholar
[30]	段小燕, 施玉格. 三氯化六氨合钴浸提-分光光度法测定新疆土壤中阳离子交换量[J]. 干旱环境监测, 2019, 33(3): 113−116. Google Scholar Duan X Y, Shi Y G. Determination of the cation exchange capacity in Xinjiang soils using a hexamminecobalt trichloride solution by spectrophotography[J]. Arid Environmental Monitoring, 2019, 33(3): 113−116. Google Scholar
[31]	李媛, 段小燕, 施玉格, 等. 振荡提取-荧光分光光度法分析土壤样品中石油类物质[J]. 岩矿测试, 2023, 42(6): 1240−1247. Google Scholar Li Y, Duan X Y, Shi Y G, et al. Determination of the petroleum oil in soil by fluorescence spectrophotometry with oscillatory extraction[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2023, 42(6): 1240−1247. Google Scholar