Professional Committee of Rock and Mineral Testing Technology of the Geological Society of China, National Geological Experiment and Testing CenterHost
2023 Vol. 42, No. 3
Article Contents

LIU Mei. Research Progress of Geological Reference Materials in China[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2023, 42(3): 445-463. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202111010158
Citation: LIU Mei. Research Progress of Geological Reference Materials in China[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2023, 42(3): 445-463. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202111010158

Research Progress of Geological Reference Materials in China

  • Geological reference material is a primary standard to ensure the accuracy of geological sample analysis results. After more than 40 years of development, China has developed and certified thousands of geological reference materials covering different media such as rock, ore, soil, sediment, organism, and water. China’s metrological management department divides the certified reference material into two classes according to the classification class, the first-class reference material (GBW) and the second-class reference material [GBW(E)]. According to their attributes and application fields, they are divided into 13 categories[6-7], and the geological reference materials belong to the seventh category [GBW07 and GBW(E)07]. It can be seen from the National Sharing Platform for Reference Materials (https://www.ncrm.org.cn) that by the end of the 13th Five-Year Plan, the total number of geological reference materials approved by the State Administration for Market Regulation is 1013, including 718 first-class certified reference materials, and the amount of first-class certified reference materials ranks first in the 13 categories (Fig.1). Geological materials are the most important and basic raw materials in the development of human society, with various types, complex components, and large differences in component content. It is because of the complexity of geological materials and the demand for reliable quantitative analysis that thousands of geological reference materials have been developed. Some reference materials developed by some industrial geological agencies are classified into other categories in classification management, such as isotope reference materials belonging to the fourth category, biological composition reference materials belonging to the tenth category, coal reference materials belonging to the eleventh category, these reference materials are widely used in related geological work, and in this paper they will be classified as geological reference materials. To systematically grasp the development status of geological reference materials in China, the first-class geological certified reference materials are comprehensively sorted, and are divided into six categories according to the type of matrix, property value and application scope: basic, ore, marine, environment, energy and special purpose (Table 1), and the development situation of each type, matrix characteristics and fixed value index respectively are summarized. On the basis of summarizing the results, on one hand, the main problems existing in the application of geological reference materials and the causes of these problems are analyzed. On the other hand, the detailed technical problems that may affect the uncertainty in the process of homogeneity, stability and characterization are discussed, and the views and suggestions are expounded.  In this paper, the first-class geological certified reference materials are divided into the following six categories to summarize the development of each type:   (1) 260 basic geological reference materials have been developed, the type of matrix including rock, soil and river sediments. The characteristic components of the certified value are generally 70 elements and compounds, which are mainly used as monitoring standards for sample analysis in basic geological surveys and research.  (2) 272 ore geological reference materials have been developed, including precious metal ore, metal ore, single mineral, and non-metallic ore. The specific mineral types are shown in Table 1. There are generally 20 property values, which are the main technical indicators in mineral exploration. They are mainly used as a monitoring standard for geological exploration, mineral processing and smelting, comprehensive utilization, commodity inspection and trade amongst other fields.  (3) 16 marine geological reference materials have been developed, including marine sediments and marine minerals. The specific samples include 10 marine sediment reference materials namely, 1 near sea, 1 Yellow Sea, 2 South China Sea, 1 East China Sea, 3 deep Pacific Ocean, 1 Antarctic Ocean and 1 Arctic Ocean. Six marine mineral reference materials are three polymetallic nodules and three ocean cobalt-enriched crusts. The characteristic composition of the certification value is the same as that of the basic geological reference material, but slightly less, generally 51-71 kinds. This is a necessary chemical composition measurement standard for marine sediment measurement and marine mineral resource survey and research.  (4) 101 standard materials for environmental geology have been developed, including the available state of soil elements, the form of soil and sediment elements, the valence state of groundwater elements, the extractable state of soil elements, biological inorganic elements, organic pollutants in soil and sediment and other reference materials. The characteristic components of the matrix and certified values are the total amount of inorganic elements in biological samples, the available states, and forms of elements in soil and sediment, the valence states of elements in water and organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil and sediment. This kind of reference material provides analytical quality monitoring standards for land quality geochemical surveys and evaluation, regional ecological geochemical evaluations, multi-objective geochemical surveys and detailed surveys of soil pollution.  (5) 23 energy geological reference materials have been developed. The property values of oil-generating rock reference materials are organic carbon, pyrolysis hydrocarbon S2, pyrolysis peak temperature Tmax, and chloroform asphalt “A”. The property values of coal reference material are calorific value, ash, volatile matter, total sulfur, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, true relative density and phosphorus, chlorine, fluorine, and arsenic. The property values of the reference materials of highly evolved hydrocarbon source rock are pyrolysis hydrocarbon S2, pyrolysis peak temperature Tmax, and total organic carbon TOC. This is the monitoring standard for the exploration, evaluation and rational utilization of energy and mineral resources.  (6) 129 reference materials for special purposes have been developed, including 20 synthetic reference materials for emission spectroscopy and 4 synthetic reference materials for X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy analysis. The property values are 28-29 inorganic chemical elements. There are 38 isotope reference materials, and the property values of those include isotope abundance and abundance ratio. There are 35 electron probe reference materials, and the property values are generally two principal components of their minerals. There are 15 reference materials for phase analysis, and the property values are the corresponding main phase. There are 5 soil limit water content reference materials, and the property values are 10mm liquid limit, plastic limit, and plastic index. There are 12 soil pH reference materials, and the property values are pH. It can be seen from the classification and summary that the geological reference material matrix in China is rich in types and quantities, which establishes an influential quality monitoring system for geological sample analysis, ensures the reliability and consistency of geological sample test data, and significantly improves the comparability and scientific value of relevant data.  At present, there are still some problems in the application and development technology of a large number of geological reference materials. The problems are discussed and analyzed, hoping to draw attention to improving the value determination class of geological reference materials. In the aspect of application, the specific problems existing in different types of geological reference materials and their causes at the present stage are analyzed and development suggestions are proposed, according to the work needs of current mineral resources, international cooperation, marine strategy, ecological civilization and other fields. In the aspect of development technology, some detail technologies which may affect the value determination class in the process of homogeneity, stability and characterization are analyzed. In the aspect of development technology, some detail technologies which may affect the setting in the process of homogeneity, stability and value setting are analyzed. The test method of homogeneity and the evaluation method of stability uncertainty are discussed. Suggestions are made for the uncertainty evaluation method of unexamined elements for homogeneity test and control limit of relative extended uncertainty.  1. Three problems existing in the current application of geological reference materials are analyzed:   (1) The quantity of some types of reference materials developed is small, the gradient distribution of characteristic values is insufficient, and the matrix type is simple. For example, the amount of marine geology, micro-area analysis, energy and mineral resource reference material development is small. The ore-forming elements of key metal ore reference materials are mainly low content, lacking rich ore grade or higher content grade. The matrix types of the samples of organic pollutant reference materials are only soil and sediment, and the property values are only organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other compounds, and the matrix types and target compounds are few. The main reasons for these problems are difficulty in obtaining samples, little working demand, difficulty in ensuring the uniformity and stability of the sample preparation technology, large error of analysis technology unable to determine the value.  (2) There are many components in the geological reference materials with mature development technology that have no certified values. The reasons of low element content and test interference are mainly analyzed.  (3) At the current class of analytical technology, there is only one measurement method for several elements, and for some elements, with the widespread application of modern instrumental analysis technology, the optional measurement method is gradually becoming singular.   2. The detail technology of four aspects in the development of reference material is discussed:   (1) Uniformity testing method. XRF is a widely used measurement method for the uniformity test of geological standard materials due to its high testing precision. However, due to its large sample size, XRF cannot meet the requirements of minimum sample size. Since the release and implementation of China National Technical Specification for Measurement “General and Statistical Principles for Characterization of Reference Materials” (JJF1343) in 2012, the uniformity of reference materials was tested by ICP-MS and ICP-OES under 0.1g weighing sample[24-30]. The measurement precision of these two methods is not as good overall as that of XRF, and the accuracy of individual elements is poor, which may cause the numerical value to be too large when calculating the uncertainty introduced by uniformity, thus affecting the reasonable evaluation of the uncertainty of property value. For this reason, some scholars[34-35] improved the XRF sample preparation device, studied the accuracy and precision of the method under 0.1g weighing sample, and verified the application effect for uniformity testing. However, only 10 major components in the reference materials of soil and stream sediments were tested under 0.1g weighing sample, while the reference materials of other matrix types and other trace elements, especially heavy elements, have not been studied and tested. Therefore, the feasibility of the XRF method with a sample size of 0.1g still needs to be verified.  (2) Uncertainty calculation method for elements without uniformity test. The composition of geological materials is complex, and its reference substances generally have multiple attribute values, and the content of each component is greatly different, so it is usually difficult to test the uniformity of all attribute values. According to the provisions of JJF1646—2017, the characteristic of representative and less homogeneous should be selected for uniformity evaluation. The uncertainty of the untested elements can be evaluated according to the concentration and geochemical properties with reference to the uncertainty introduced by the tested elements. However, the exact calculation method was not specified. An evaluation method that considers both element properties, content and test methods (Table 2) is presented here. The specific calculation method is to multiply the relative uncertainty (Ur) of the uniformity of the detected element by the standard value μ of the undetected element and take it as the uncertainty component ubb of the undetected element.  (3) Evaluation method of stability uncertainty. At present, trend analysis method is generally used to evaluate the stability uncertainty (us) of geological reference materials, and the calculation formula is us=s(b1t. It can be seen from the formula that the longer the stability monitoring time, the greater the stability uncertainty introduced. The stability uncertainty data of several reference materials were compared and determined to be the main contribution to the total uncertainty, which is inconsistent with the long-term observation of the stability of the geological reference materials. Therefore, this calculation method is not suitable to evaluate the uncertainty introduced into the stability of geological reference material. Meng et al.[42] suggested using the analysis of variance to calculate, and the comparative analysis showed that us was still the main contribution to the total uncertainty. Wang et al.[43] used range method to calculate us, but the application of this method in geological reference materials has yet to be verified. In conclusion, the reasonable evaluation of stability uncertainty of matrix reference materials with more test error sources needs to be studied further.  (4) Control limits for relative extended uncertainty. The determination of the property value of geological reference materials usually has certain control requirements for relative extended uncertainty (Urel), but these control limits are rarely introduced in the public information of the reference material. It was not until the specification JJF1646 published in 2017 that Urel was required in principle. Urel is the embodiment of the quality of property value data. Urel control limits in Table 3 are proposed on the basis of the principle requirements of JJF1646—2017 by referring to the control limits in the development of existing reference materials and the analysis of different types of geological reference materials. In the process of development, the developer also needs to comprehensively consider the matrix condition, setting index, element content of the sample and formulate reasonable Urel control limits of uncertainty in combination with the current analysis technology class, to obtain accurate and reasonable property value and uncertainty.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 尹明. 我国地质分析测试技术发展现状及趋势[J]. 岩矿测试,2009,28(1):37−52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2009.01.009

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Yin M. Progress and prospect on geoanalytical techniques in China[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2009, 28(1):37−52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2009.01.009

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] 刘勇胜,屈文俊,漆亮,等. 中国岩矿分析测试研究进展与展望(2011—2020)[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报,2021,40(3):515−539.

    Google Scholar

    Liu Y S,Qu W J,Qi L,et al. Advances and perspectives of researches on rock and mineral analyses in China (2011—2020)[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry, 2021, 40(3):515−539.

    Google Scholar

    [3] Yan M C,Cheng Z Z. Study and application of geochemical reference materials in the institute of geophysical and geochemical exploration[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2007, 31(4):301−309. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2007.00133.x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] 卢晓华,薄梦,吴雪,等. 标准物质领域发展现状及趋势[J]. 化学试剂,2022,44(10):1403−1410.

    Google Scholar

    Lu X H,Bo M,Wu X,et al. Current situation and trends on the development of reference materials[J]. Chemical Reagents, 2022, 44(10):1403−1410.

    Google Scholar

    [5] Wilson S A,Potts P J, Webb P C. Three new geochemical reference materials for mineral exploration and environmental contamination studies:SdAR-L2,SdAR-M2 and SdAR-H1[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2021, 45(2):359−367. doi: 10.1111/ggr.12300

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] 陈钰,程义斌,孟凡敏,等. 国内外标准物质发展现况[J]. 环境卫生学杂志,2017,7(2):156−163.

    Google Scholar

    Chen Y,Cheng Y B,Meng F M,et al. Review on statues of reference materials in different countries[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2017, 7(2):156−163.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 李恩重,徐大军,酆晨,等. 我国标准样品分类原则和命名方法研究[J]. 中国标准化,2021(22):6−14,20.

    Google Scholar

    Li E Z,Xu D J,Feng C,et al. Research on classification principles and nomenclature of reference material in China[J]. China Standardization, 2021(22):6−14,20.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 李延河. “同位素分析新技术与地质应用研究新进展”专辑特邀主编寄语[J]. 地球学报,2020,41(5):583−589.

    Google Scholar

    Li Y H. Guest editor’s preface to the “New technologies of isotope analysis and its applications in geology”[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2020, 41(5):583−589.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 王松,高钰涯,王军,等. 微区原位元素及同位素分析标准物质研究进展[J]. 质谱学报,2021,42(5):641−655.

    Google Scholar

    Wang S,Gao Y Y,Wang J,et al. Recent progress of reference materials for in-situ elemental and isotopic microanalysis[J]. Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society, 2021, 42(5):641−655.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 陈意,胡兆初,贾丽辉,等. 微束分析测试技术十年(2011~2020)进展与展望[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报,2021,40(1):1−35,253.

    Google Scholar

    Chen Y,Hu Z C,Jia L H,et al. Progress of microbeam analytical technologies in the past decade (2011—2020) and prospect[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry, 2021, 40(1):1−35,253.

    Google Scholar

    [11] Rinaldi R,Llovet X. Electron probe microanalysis:A review of the past,present,and future[J]. Microsc Microanal, 2015, 21:1053−1069.

    Google Scholar

    [12] Llovet X,Moya,Pinard P T,et al. Electron probe microanalysis:A review of recent developments and applications in materials science and engineering[J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2021(116):100673.

    Google Scholar

    [13] Huang C,Wang H,Yang J H,et al. SA01—A proposed zircon reference material for microbeam U-Pb age and Hf-O isotopic determination[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2020, 44(1):103−123. doi: 10.1111/ggr.12307

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] 赵秀峰,高孝礼,曹磊,等. 土壤界限含水率标准物质研制[J]. 岩矿测试,2021,40(4):593−602.

    Google Scholar

    Zhao X F,Gao X L,Cao L,et al. Preparation of certified reference materials for soil limit water content[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2021, 40(4):593−602.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 陶琛,李春生,初威澄,等. 非色散原子荧光光谱法同时检测硒和铅的光源干扰校正方法研究[J]. 分析化学,2019,47(1):163−168.

    Google Scholar

    Tao C,Li C S,Chu W C,et al. Correction method of light source interference for simultaneous determination of selenium and lead by non-dispersive hydride generation-atomic fluorescence spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 47(1):163−168.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 贾亚青,吴红,沈正生. 非色散原子荧光激发光源杂质检测方法与装置研究[J]. 计量学报,2017,38(4):504−506.

    Google Scholar

    Jia Y Q,Wu H,Shen Z S. Research on method and device of non-disperse atomic fluorescence exciting source impurity detection[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2017, 38(4):504−506.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 赵宗生,赵小学,姜晓旭等. 原子荧光光谱测定土壤和水系沉积物中硒的干扰来源及消除方法[J]. 岩矿测试,2019,38(3):333−340.

    Google Scholar

    Zhao Z S,Zhao X X,Jiang X X,et al. Interference sources and elimination methods for the determination of selenium in soil and water sediment by atomic fluorescence spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019, 38(3):333−340.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 苏文峰,李刚. 焙烧分离-氢化物发生-原子荧光光谱法测定土壤样品中微量硒[J]. 岩矿测试,2008,27(2):120−122.

    Google Scholar

    Su W F,Li G. Determination of trace selenium in soil samples by hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry with baking separation[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2008, 27(2):120−122.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 洪光辉,王晴晴,崔喜平,等. ICP-MS分析中的干扰及其消除研究进展[J]. 实验科学与技术,2021,19(3):14−21.

    Google Scholar

    Hong G H,Wang Q Q,Cui X P,et al. The development progress of interference and elimination with ICP-MS[J]. Experiment Science and Technology, 2021, 19(3):14−21.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 白金峰,薄玮,张勤,等. 高分辨电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定地球化学样品中的36种元素[J]. 岩矿测试,2012,31(5):814−819. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2012.05.010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Bai J F,Bo W,Zhang Q,et al. Determination of 36 elements in geochemical samples by high resolution inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2012, 31(5):814−819. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2012.05.010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] 姚永刚,肖才锦,王平生,等. 嫦娥五号月壤中子活化分析研究[J]. 同位素,2022,35(1):70−74. doi: 10.7538/tws.2021.youxian.102

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Yao Y G,Xiao C J,Wang P S,et al. Instrumental neutron activation analysis for Luanr samples returned by Chang’E-5[J]. Journal of Isotopes, 2022, 35(1):70−74. doi: 10.7538/tws.2021.youxian.102

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] 姜怀坤,成学海,张文娟,等. 中子活化法测定地球化学样品中32种元素[J]. 理化检验(化学分册),2015,51(4):429−432.

    Google Scholar

    Jiang H K,Cheng X H,Zhang W J,et al. Determination of 32 elements in geochemistry samples by neutron activation analysis[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis (Part B:Chemical Analysis), 2015, 51(4):429−432.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 鄢明才,史长义,顾铁新,等. 生物成分系列标准物质的研制[J]. 岩矿测试,2006,25(2):159−172.

    Google Scholar

    Yan M C,Shi C Y,Gu T X,et al. Preparation and certification of biological reference materials[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2006, 25(2):159−172.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 刘瑱,马玲,时晓露,等. 石英岩化学成分分析标准物质研制[J]. 岩矿测试,2014,33(6):849−856.

    Google Scholar

    Liu Z,Ma L,Shi X L,et al. Preparation of quartzite reference materials for chemical composition analysis[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2014, 33(6):849−856.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 洪飞,刘耀华,吕振生,等. 钛铁矿化学成分标准物质研制[J]. 岩矿测试,2014,33(1):67−73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2014.01.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Hong F,Liu Y H,Lyu Z S,et al. Certified reference materials preparation of ilmenite chemical composition[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2014, 33(1):67−73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2014.01.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] 许春雪,王亚平,张旭,等. 矽线石成分分析标准物质研制[J]. 岩矿测试,2017,36(4):396−404.

    Google Scholar

    Xu C X,Wang Y P,Zhang X,et al. Preparation of certified reference materials of sillimanite for chemical composition analysis[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2017, 36(4):396−404.

    Google Scholar

    [27] 魏双,王家松,徐铁民,等. 海泡石化学成分分析标准物质研制[J]. 岩矿测试,2021,40(5):763−773.

    Google Scholar

    Wei S,Wang J S,Xu T M,et al. Preparation of sepiolite reference material for chemical composition analysis[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2021, 40(5):763−773.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 洪飞,赵伟,刘耀华,等. 菱镁矿、蛇纹岩、碲金矿化学成分标准物质研制[J]. 山东国土资源,2018,34(5):95−101.

    Google Scholar

    Hong F,Zhao W,Liu Y H,et al. Preparation of chemical composition standard material of magnesite serpentine and tellurium gold deposit[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2018, 34(5):95−101.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 董学林,熊玉祥,肖宇鹰,等. 高品位多金属矿石成分分析标准物质研制[J]. 资源环境与工程,2021,35(6):905−913.

    Google Scholar

    Dong X L,Xiong Y X,Xiao Y Y,et al. Development of standard material for composition analysis of high grade polymetallic ore[J]. Resources Environment & Engineering, 2021, 35(6):905−913.

    Google Scholar

    [30] Tang M L,Fan B L,Yao L Y,et al. Preparation and certification of reference materials (GBW07397,GBW07398,GBW07399 and GBW07400) for selenium and other trace element mass fractions[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2020, 44(2):375−384. doi: 10.1111/ggr.12311

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] 颜茂弘,鲍琪儿,王祖荫,等. 岩石标准物质均匀性的XRF检查法[J]. 岩矿测试,1988,7(1):61−65.

    Google Scholar

    Yan M H,Bao Q E,Wang Z Y,et al. A study on homogeneity test of powdered rock reference materials by XRF method[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 1988, 7(1):61−65.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 茅祖兴,鲁豪东. X射线荧光光谱法检验标准物质的均匀性[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析,1991,11(3):62−65,39.

    Google Scholar

    Mao Z X,Lu H D. Testing homogeneity of certified reference materials by XRF[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 1991, 11(3):62−65,39.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 李国会,樊守忠. X射线荧光光谱法在标准物质均匀性检验中的应用[J]. 地质实验室,1995,11(1):40−43.

    Google Scholar

    Li G H,Fan S Z. Application of X-ray fluorescence method in test for homogeneity of reference materials[J]. Geological Laboratory, 1995, 11(1):40−43.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 赵红坤,于阗,肖志博,等. 粉末压片-X射线荧光光谱法在地球化学标准物质均匀性检验中的应用研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析,2021,41(3):755−762.

    Google Scholar

    Zhao H K,Yu T,Xiao Z B,et al. Homogeneity test of geochemical certified reference materials by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry with pressed-powder pellets[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(3):755−762.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 赵红坤,郝亚波,田有国,等. 熔融制样-X射线荧光光谱法测定小取样量地球化学样品中的主量元素[J]. 物探与化探,2020,44(4):778−783.

    Google Scholar

    Zhao H K,Hao Y B,Tian Y G,et al. The application of melting sample preparation-X ray fluorescence spectrometry to measuring a small amount of soil certified reference material[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(4):778−783.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 杨卓孚. 岩矿石地质标准物质研制中的几个问题[J]. 化工矿产地质,1996(3):90−94, 101.

    Google Scholar

    Yang Z F. Some problems facing the preparation of standard samples for identification of rocks and ores[J]. Geology of Chemical Minerals, 1996(3):90−94, 101.

    Google Scholar

    [37] 鄢明才. 地球化学标准物质标准值不确定度估算探讨[J]. 岩矿测试,2001,20(4):287−293. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2001.04.011

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Yan M C. Discussion on estimation of uncertainty of certified values from geochemical standard reference materials[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2001, 20(4):287−293. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2001.04.011

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] 杨佳佳,孙玮琳,徐学敏,等. 高演化烃源岩岩石热解和总有机碳标准物质研制[J]. 地质学报,2020,94(11):3515−3522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.11.023

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Yang J J,Sun W L,Xu X M,et al. Preparation of certified reference materials for rock-eval and total organic carbon of postmature source rock[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2020, 94(11):3515−3522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.11.023

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] 刘妹,顾铁新,潘含江,等. 泛滥平原沉积物标准物质研制[J]. 岩矿测试,2018,37(5):558−571.

    Google Scholar

    Liu M,Gu T X,Pan H J,et al. Preparation of seven certified reference materials for floodplain sediments[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2018, 37(5):558−571.

    Google Scholar

    [40] 陈宗定,许春雪,刘贵磊,等. 6种南方酸性土壤重金属元素氯化钙可提取态标准物质研制[J]. 冶金分析,2021,41(10):12−22.

    Google Scholar

    Chen Z D,Xu C X,Liu G L,et al. Development of six extractable certified reference materials of calcium chloride for analysis of heavy metals in southern acid soil[J]. Metallurgical Analysis, 2021, 41(10):12−22.

    Google Scholar

    [41] 王干珍,彭君,李力,等. 锰矿石成分分析标准物质研制[J]. 岩矿测试,2021,40(6):1−10.

    Google Scholar

    Wang G Z,Peng J,Li L,et al. Preparation of standard material for composition analysis of manganese ore[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2021, 40(6):1−10.

    Google Scholar

    [42] 孟凡敏,阚莹. 标准物质稳定性不确定度的评估[J]. 计量学报,2010,31(5A):112−114.

    Google Scholar

    Meng F M,Kan Y. Evaluatian of the uncertainty contribution of instability for reference material[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2010, 31(5A):112−114.

    Google Scholar

    [43] 汪斌,卢晓华,王茜. 质量控制图在标准物质稳定性评估中的应用[J]. 化学试剂,2019,41(5):475−477.

    Google Scholar

    Wang B,Lu X H,Wang Q. Application of control chart for assessment of stability of reference materials[J]. Chemical Reagents, 2019, 41(5):475−477.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(2)

Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(1648) PDF downloads(163) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint