Professional Committee of Rock and Mineral Testing Technology of the Geological Society of China, National Geological Experiment and Testing CenterHost
2023 Vol. 42, No. 2
Article Contents

CHEN Kai, LIU Fei, YANG Zihan, XIANG Xin. Review on the Determination of Oxidant Demand for in-situ Chemical Oxidation Application[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2023, 42(2): 271-281. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202202170023
Citation: CHEN Kai, LIU Fei, YANG Zihan, XIANG Xin. Review on the Determination of Oxidant Demand for in-situ Chemical Oxidation Application[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2023, 42(2): 271-281. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202202170023

Review on the Determination of Oxidant Demand for in-situ Chemical Oxidation Application

More Information
  • In-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) refers to the use of appropriate conveyance technology to transport oxidants into soil or aquifer, where the contaminants are converted to low- or non-toxic substances by chemical oxidation. ISCO has been widely used for the remediation of organic contaminants in soil and groundwater due to its high efficiency and cost effectiveness.

    Oxidant demand is an important parameter in the application of ISCO. Once injected into the contaminated soil or aquifer, the oxidant reacts not only with the target contaminants, but also with natural organic matter (NOM) and reductive minerals (RM) such as Fe2+, Mn2+, S- and S2- in the medium. In addition, the oxidant may decompose naturally due to its own properties. If the amount of oxidant used is insufficient, the remediation of the contaminated site may not meet the project objectives and residual contaminants or reaction intermediates may be formed, resulting in a rebound of the contaminant concentration at the site. If too much oxidant is used, it would not only increase the cost of remediation, but also seriously damage the physical and chemical properties of soil, reducing the diversity of microbial communities. Therefore, accurate measurement of oxidant requirements is important to achieve good remediation performance.

    In previous studies, the specific meaning of terms related to oxidant demand is not consistent and they are often mixed in different studies, which would lead to ambiguity.In this review the composition and definition of oxidant demand is clarified and unified. The total oxidant demand (TOD) in ISCO is composed of pollutant oxidant demand (POD, the amount of oxidant consumed by oxidative degradation of pollutants), natural oxidant demand (NOD, the amount of oxidant consumed by natural organic matter and reducing minerals in soil or aquifer media), and decomposed oxidant (DEO, the amount of oxidant naturally decomposed due to its nature and the influence of environmental conditions).

    The methods for determining oxidant demand can be divided into two categories: experimental method and stoichiometric model method. The basic principle of the experimental method is to mix the treated medium sample with the oxidant in a system for a period of time, and then calculate the oxidant consumption before and after reaction to obtain the oxidant demand per unit of medium. Specifically, the experimental method can be divided into batch test, column test, push-pull test and reaction kinetics model according to the scale and dimension of the experiment. Among them, the batch test has been relatively widely used due to its excellent characteristics of simplicity and efficiency. The column test is more capable of reflecting the actual consumption of oxidant in the field medium, taking into account the transport process and interaction of oxidant in porous media. Although the push-pull test is carried out at the field scale, which can effectively overcome the error caused by the difference between laboratory conditions and field conditions, it is relatively complex to operate. Finally, the reaction kinetics model can be used to analyze the oxidant consumption in the reaction process based on experiments. This method can characterize the oxidant consumption on a longer time scale, which is of great importance for potassium permanganate or sodium persulfate oxidants with longer reaction times.

    The determination of oxidant demand by experimental method is affected by factors such as the initial concentration of oxidant, reaction time, solid-to-liquid ratio and mixing conditions of the reaction. To facilitate comparison of data and costing of the project, it is necessary to incorporate experimental conditions into the expression of oxidant demand. For example, the difference of the oxidant demand obtained at different times for the same sample can be as much as 37%. Therefore, the time required for the pollutant concentration to be reduced to the target limit by oxidation should be used as the oxidant demand determination time.

    Stoichiometric model method is the determination of the theoretical oxidant demand value by the establishment of the stoichiometric relationship model between the oxidant demand and the components in the medium. The stoichiometric model method was originally designed to explore the relationship between the total organic carbon in the medium and the oxidant demand. It was then developed to consider the oxidant demand of natural organic matter, other mineral ions and organic pollutants as a whole. Calculation results of the stoichiometric modelling method depend on the accuracy of the model and the precise determination of the content of relevant components in the medium.

    Both experimental method and stoichiometric model method mostly take potassium permanganate oxidant as the research object, but there is a lack of research on the demand of Fenton reagent, ozone and sodium persulfate. In particular, the DEO of more decomposable oxidants such as Fenton reagent and ozone may reach more than 50% of TOD. The existing methods still face difficulties in accurately measuring DEO, which deserves special attention. As a component of TOD that is easily overlooked, the importance of DEO needs to be further clarified and more accurate measurement methods need to be explored. In the actual project, the number of injection wells, well spacing, oxidant injection rate and other design parameters will have an important impact on the total oxidant demand, which still needs to be further investigated. The remediation of contaminated sites by ISCO is a complex project and a more scientific workflow or guideline is necessary for engineers to determine oxidant demand.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 郑伟, 梅浩, 陈敬仁. 原位化学氧化技术在地下水修复工程中的应用[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2018(10): 23-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2251.2018.10.026

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Zheng W, Mei H, Chen J R. Application of in situ chemical oxidation technology in groundwater remediation projects[J]. Resources Economization & Environmental Protection, 2018(10): 23-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2251.2018.10.026

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] 沈宗泽, 王祺, 阎思诺, 等. 连续管式原位注入化学氧化技术对某有机污染场地地下水的修复效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2022, 16(1): 93-100.

    Google Scholar

    Shen Z Z, Wang Q, Yan S N, et al. Pilot scale study on groundwater remediation in an organic contaminated site by coiled tubing in situ injection chemical oxidation technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2022, 16(1): 93-100.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 章生卫, 程小谷, 于李罡, 等. 石油烃污染地下水原位化学氧化修复研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2021, 44(S1): 56-60. doi: 10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.2021.S1.009

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Zhang S W, Cheng X G, Yu L G, et al. Research on in situ chemical oxidation remediation of groundwater contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 44(S1): 56-60. doi: 10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.2021.S1.009

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Boulangé M, Lorgeoux C, Biache C, et al. Fenton-like and potassium permanganate oxidations of PAH-contaminated soils: Impact of oxidant doses on PAH and polar PAC (polycyclic aromatic compound) behavior[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 224: 437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.108

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] 曹兴涛, 谷广锋, 王新新, 等. 储油罐污染场地原位化学氧化修复进展[J]. 现代化工, 2017, 37(6): 20-23. doi: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2017.06.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Cao X T, Gu G F, Wang X X, et al. Progress of in situ chemical oxidation remediation of contaminated site by leaking oil storage tank[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2017, 37(6): 20-23. doi: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2017.06.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Huling S G, Ross R R, Prestbo K M. In situ chemical oxidation: Permanganate oxidant volume design considerations[J]. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 2017, 37(2): 78-86.

    Google Scholar

    [7] Haselow J S, Siegrist R L, Crimi M, et al. Estimating the total oxidant demand for in situ chemical oxidation design[J]. Remediation Journal, 2003, 13(4): 5-16. doi: 10.1002/rem.10080

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Mumford K G, Thomson N R, Allen-King R M. Bench-scale investigation of permanganate natural oxidant demand kinetics[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(8): 2835-2840.

    Google Scholar

    [9] Kim U, Parker J C, Borden R C. Stochastic cost-optimization and risk assessment of in situ chemical oxidation for dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source remediation[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2019, 33(1): 73-89. doi: 10.1007/s00477-018-1633-y

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Kakosová E, Hrabák P, Cerník M, et al. Effect of various chemical oxidation agents on soil microbial communities[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 314: 257-265. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.065

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] 杨乐巍, 张岳, 李书鹏, 等. 原位化学氧化高压注射修复优化设计与应用案例分析[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(8): 185-189.

    Google Scholar

    Yang L W, Zhang Y, Li S P, et al. A case study on design and application of in situ chemical oxidation high pressure injection remediation[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2019, 37(8): 185-189.

    Google Scholar

    [12] Wang N, Zheng T, Zhang G, et al. A review on Fenton-like processes for organic wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2016, 4(1): 762-787. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2015.12.016

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Li Y, Yang K, Liao X, et al. Quantification of oxidant demand and consumption for in situ chemical oxidation design: In the case of potassium permanganate[J]. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 2018, 229(11): 375.

    Google Scholar

    [14] Ranc B, Faure P, Croze V, et al. Selection of oxidant doses for in situ chemical oxidation of soils contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): A review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 312: 280-297. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.03.068

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] ASTM. D7262-10. Standard test method for estimating the permanganate natural oxidant demand of soil and aquifer solids[S]. 2010.

    Google Scholar

    [16] Mumford K G, Lamarche C S, Thomson N R. Natural oxidant demand of aquifer materials using the push-pull technique[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2004, 130(10): 1139-1146. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:10(1139)

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Brown R A. In situ chemical oxidation: Performance, practice, and pitfalls. AFCEE Technology Transfer Workshop[R]. San Antonio, 2003.

    Google Scholar

    [18] Liang C, Chien Y C, Lin Y L. Impacts of ISCO persul-fate, peroxide and permanganate oxidants on soils: Soil oxidant demand and soil properties[J]. Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal, 2012, 21(6): 701-719. doi: 10.1080/15320383.2012.691129

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Besha A T, Bekele D N, Naidu R, et al. Recent advances in surfactant-enhanced in situ chemical oxidation for the remediation of non-aqueous phase liquid contaminated soils and aquifers[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2018, 9: 303-322.

    Google Scholar

    [20] Liu J, Liu Z, Zhang F, et al. Thermally activated persulfate oxidation of NAPL chlorinated organic compounds: Effect of soil composition on oxidant demand in different soil-persulfate systems[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2017, 75(8): 1794-1803. doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.052

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Huling S G, Pivetz B E. In situ chemical oxidation[R]. EPA, 2006.

    Google Scholar

    [22] Hønning J, Broholm M M, Bjerg P L. Quantification of potassium permanganate consumption and PCE oxidation in subsurface materials[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2007, 90(3-4): 221-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.10.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Liao X, Zhao D, Yan X. Determination of potassium perman-ganate demand variation with depth for oxidation-remediation of soils from a PAHs-contaminated coking plant[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 193: 164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.045

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Siegrist R L, Crimi M, Simpkin T J. In situ chemical oxidation for groundwater remediation[M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 刘中良, 洪小峰, 舒代容. 有机污染场地氧化剂需求量及不同活化条件下氧化剂降解动力学研究[J]. 环境与发展, 2020, 32(11): 84-86.

    Google Scholar

    Liu Z L, Hong X F, Shu D R. Study on oxidant demand and degradation kinetics of oxidant under different activation conditions in organic polluted sites[J]. Environment & Development, 2020, 32(11): 84-86.

    Google Scholar

    [26] Costanza J, Otaño G, Callaghan J, et al. PCE oxidation by sodium persulfate in the presence of solids[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(24): 9445-9450.

    Google Scholar

    [27] Lee E S, Woo N C, Schwartz F W, et al. Characterization of controlled-release KMnO4 (CRP) barrier system for groundwater remediation: A pilot-scale flow-tank study[J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 71(5): 902-910. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.037

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Urynowicz M A, Balu B, Udayasankar U. Kinetics of natural oxidant demand by permanganate in aquifer solids[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2008, 96(1-4): 187-194.

    Google Scholar

    [29] Tsitonaki A, Petri B, Crimi M, et al. In situ chemical oxida-tion of contaminated soil and groundwater using persulfate: A review[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 40(1): 55-91.

    Google Scholar

    [30] Cha K Y, Borden R C. Impact of injection system design on ISCO performance with permanganate-mathematical modeling results[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2012, 128(1): 33-46.

    Google Scholar

    [31] Dangi M B, Urynowicz M A, Udayasankar U. Assessment of the experimental conditions affecting natural oxidant demand of soil by permanganate[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 5160-5166.

    Google Scholar

    [32] Dangi M B, Urynowicz M A, Schultz C L, et al. A comparison of the soil natural oxidant demand exerted by permanganate, hydrogen peroxide, sodium persulfate, and sodium percarbonate[J]. Environmental Challenges, 2022, 7: 100456.

    Google Scholar

    [33] Yan N, Liu F, Chen Y, et al. Influence of groundwater constituents on 1, 4-dioxane degradation by a binary oxidant system[J]. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 2016, 227(12): 1-7.

    Google Scholar

    [34] Urynowicz M A. In situ chemical oxidation with perman-ganate: Assessing the competitive interactions between target and nontarget compounds[J]. Soil & Sediment Contamination, 2007, 17(1): 53-62.

    Google Scholar

    [35] Al-Shamsi M A, Thomson N R. Competition by aquifer materials in a bimetallic nanoparticle/persulfate system for the treatment of trichloroethylene[J]. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 2013, 15(10): 1964-1968.

    Google Scholar

    [36] Baciocchi R. Principles, developments and design criteria of in situ chemical oxidation[J]. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 2013, 224(12): 1-11.

    Google Scholar

    [37] 王文坦, 邵雁, 李社锋, 等. 一种土壤化学需氧量的测定方法: CN201610539931.8[P]. 2016-11-23.

    Google Scholar

    Wang W T, Shao Y, Li S F, et al. A method for determination of chemical oxygen demand of soil: CN201610539931.8[P]. 2016-11-23.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 杨勇, 张蒋维, 陈恺, 等. 化学氧化法治理焦化厂PAHs污染土壤[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(1): 427-431.

    Google Scholar

    Yang Y, Zhang J W, Chen K, et al. Chemical oxidation of coking plant soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(1): 427-431.

    Google Scholar

    [39] Huang Q, Dong H, Towne R M, et al. Permanganate diffu-sion and reaction in sedimentary rocks[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2014, 159: 36-46.

    Google Scholar

    [40] Xu X, Thomson N R. A long-term bench-scale investi-gation of permanganate consumption by aquifer materials[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2009, 110(3-4): 73-86.

    Google Scholar

    [41] Xu X, Thomson N R. Estimation of the maximum consum-ption of permanganate by aquifer solids using a modified chemical oxygen demand test[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2008, 134(5): 353-361.

    Google Scholar

    [42] Molnár M. Hydrogen peroxide oxidation for in situ remed-iation of trichloroethylene-from the laboratory to the field[J]. Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering, 2013, 57(1-2): 41-51.

    Google Scholar

    [43] Thomson N, Sra K, Xu X. Improved understanding of in situ chemical oxidation. Technical objective 2: Soil reactivity[R]. 2009.

    Google Scholar

    [44] Xu X. Interaction of chemical oxidants with aquifer materials[D]. Waterloo: University of Waterloo, 2006.

    Google Scholar

    [45] 李旭, 苏世林, 文章, 等. 单井注抽试验测算地下水流速的数值分析[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(2): 633-641.

    Google Scholar

    Li X, Su S L, Wen Z, et al. Numerical analysis of estimating groundwater velocity through single-well push-pull test[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(2): 633-641.

    Google Scholar

    [46] Mathai A. Push-pull tests to support in situ chemical oxidation system design[D]. Waterloo: University of Waterloo, 2012.

    Google Scholar

    [47] 尚晓伟, 姚佳斌, 田文钢, 等. 原位化学氧化技术在有机污染场地中试工程设计研究[J]. 环境与发展, 2020, 32(12): 71-72.

    Google Scholar

    Shang X W, Yao J B, Tian W G, et al. Research on pilot project design of in situ chemical oxidation technology in organic contaminated site[J]. Environment and Development, 2020, 32(12): 71-72.

    Google Scholar

    [48] Ko S, Ji S. In situ push-pull tests for the determination of TCE degradation and permanganate consumption rates[J]. Environmental Geology, 2007, 53(2): 359-364.

    Google Scholar

    [49] Hendrych J, Kubal M, Beneš P, et al. The influence of solids characteristics on the specific oxidant consumption by in-situ chemical oxidation using potassium[J]. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 2008, 13(3): 285-289.

    Google Scholar

    [50] Bendouz M, Dionne J, Tran L H, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon oxidation from concentrates issued from an attrition process of polluted soil using the Fenton reagent and permanganate[J]. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 2017, 228(3): 115.

    Google Scholar

    [51] Teel A L, Elloy F C, Watts R J. Persulfate activation during exertion of total oxidant demand[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 158: 184-192.

    Google Scholar

    [52] Xu X, Thomson N R. Hydrogen peroxide persistence in the presence of aquifer materials[J]. Soil & Sediment Contamination, 2010, 19(5): 602-616.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(2050) PDF downloads(92) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint