Comparison of Different Breakage Mechanisms in Terms of RO Phase Liberation Properties in Steel Slag

HOU Xinkai; ZHANG Jin; WU Zhijiang; HUANG Ruitao; WANG Dan; GUO Haitao

doi:10.13779/j.cnki.issn1001-0076.2018.05.015

2018 Vol. 38, No. 5

Article Contents

Article navigation > Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources > 2018 > (5): 115-120, 125

Next Article Previous Article

HOU Xinkai, ZHANG Jin, WU Zhijiang, HUANG Ruitao, WANG Dan, GUO Haitao. Comparison of Different Breakage Mechanisms in Terms of RO Phase Liberation Properties in Steel Slag[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2018, (5): 115-120, 125. doi: 10.13779/j.cnki.issn1001-0076.2018.05.015

Citation:

HOU Xinkai, ZHANG Jin, WU Zhijiang, HUANG Ruitao, WANG Dan, GUO Haitao. Comparison of Different Breakage Mechanisms in Terms of RO Phase Liberation Properties in Steel Slag[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2018, (5): 115-120, 125. doi: 10.13779/j.cnki.issn1001-0076.2018.05.015

Comparison of Different Breakage Mechanisms in Terms of RO Phase Liberation Properties in Steel Slag

College of Materials and Mineral Resources, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China

Received Date: 11 April 2018

Publish Date: 25 October 2018

Abstract

Abstract

In order to find the best breakage mechanism of RO phase liberation in steel slag, four kinds of steel slag powder with different particle size distribution have been comminuted respectively by high-pressure grinding rolls (roller press), vertical roller mill (vertical mill) and ball mill. Each of them was actually sieved into 7 size fractions then made into polished section. The proportion of RO phase grain in the five liberation classes and the phase surface parameters were manually counted. The liberation properties were characterized by the two index parameters of liberation degree and the amount of 75%~100% liberated, while the amount of liberation by detachment was described by phase specific interfacial area and free surface percentage. As the RO phase in steel slag is easy to be released from the rock matrix, the amount of liberation by detachment of four steel slag powders is large. The priority sequence of comminution equipment in terms of the amount of liberation by detachment is roller press, vertical mill, ball mill. The finer the steel slag powder made by the same equipment, the better the amount of liberation by detachment. Liberated minerals could be divided into two regions by the average dissemination size of RO phase. The first region is a stability zone for liberation properties, in which the degree of liberation is independent of particle size and device. The second region is a decline zone, in which the liberation degree significantly decreases with increasing the particle size.
- steel slag /
- RO phase /
- liberation by detachment /
- phase specific interfacial area /
- compressed bed breakage

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	侯新凯, 梁爽, 刘柱燊, 等.钢渣生产高活性钢渣粉和惰性矿物产品的工艺: 201611105595.2[P].2017-05-31. Google Scholar
[2]	Tromans D. Mineral comminution:energy efficiency considerations[J]. Minerals engineering, 2008, 21(8):613-620. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2007.12.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	Lewis F M, Coburn J L, Bhappu R B. Comminution:a guide to size-reduction system design-1[J]. Mining engineering, 1976, 28(9):29-34. Google Scholar
[4]	Schönert K. A first survey of grinding with high-compression roller mills[J]. International journal of mineral processing, 1988, 22(1):401-412. Google Scholar
[5]	Han Y X, Liu L, Yuan Z T, et al. Comparison of low-grade hematite product characteristics in a high-pressure grinding roller and jaw crusher[J]. Minerals and metallurgical processing, 2012, 29(2):75-80. Google Scholar
[6]	Celik I B, Oner M. The influence of grinding mechanism on the liberation characteristics of clinker minerals[J]. Cement and concrete research, 2006, 36(3):422-427. Google Scholar
[7]	Hoşten Ç, Özbay C. A comparison of particle bed breakage and rod mill grinding with regard to mineral liberation and particle shape effects[J]. Minerals engineering, 1998, 11(9):871-874. doi: 10.1016/S0892-6875(98)00074-0 CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	Vizcarra T G, Wightman E M, Johnson N W, et al. The effect of breakage mechanism on the mineral liberation properties of sulphide ores[J]. Minerals engineering, 2010, 23(5):374-382. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2009.11.012 CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	Stutzman P E. Microscopy of clinker and hydraulic cements[J]. Reviews in mineralogy and geochemistry, 2012, 74(1):101-146. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2012.74.3 CrossRef Google Scholar
[10]	Wang E, Shi F N, Manlapig E. Mineral liberation by high voltage pulses and conventional comminution with same specific energy levels[J]. Minerals engineering, 2012, 27-28:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.12.005 CrossRef Google Scholar
[11]	袁致涛, 马玉新, 毛卫东, 等.马耳岭选矿厂尾矿中磁铁矿再回收试验研究[J].矿产保护与利用, 2014(2):44-48. Google Scholar
[12]	侯新凯, 贺宁, 袁静舒, 等.钢渣中二价金属氧化物固溶体的选别性研究[J].硅酸盐学报, 2013, 41(8):1142-1150. Google Scholar
[13]	Leißner T, Hoang D H, Rudolph M, et al. A mineral liberation study of grain boundary fracture based on measurements of the surface exposure after milling[J]. International journal of mineral processing, 2016, 156:3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2016.08.014 CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	Meloy T P. Liberation theory -eight, modern, usable theorems[J]. International journal of mineral processing, 1984, 13(4):313-324. doi: 10.1016/0301-7516(84)90051-6 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	Barbery G. Mineral liberation:measurement, simulation and practical use in mineral processing[M]. Quebec:editions GB, 1991. Google Scholar
[16]	Singh V, Venugopal R, Banerjee P K, et al. Effect of morphology on breakage and liberation characteristics of minerals and coal[J]. Minerals and metallurgical processing, 2014, 31(4):186-192. Google Scholar