GEOLOGY, GENESIS AND PROSPECTING INDICATORS OF SUNJIAGOU LEAD DEPOSIT IN LIAONING PROVINCE

LIU Li-guang; LYU Yu; XIONG Zhi-qiang; CAO Yuan; QUAN Wen-jie

doi:10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2023.02.010

2023 Vol. 32, No. 2

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geology and Resources > 2023 > 32(2): 201-210

Next Article Previous Article

LIU Li-guang, LYU Yu, XIONG Zhi-qiang, CAO Yuan, QUAN Wen-jie. GEOLOGY, GENESIS AND PROSPECTING INDICATORS OF SUNJIAGOU LEAD DEPOSIT IN LIAONING PROVINCE[J]. Geology and Resources, 2023, 32(2): 201-210. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2023.02.010

Citation:

LIU Li-guang, LYU Yu, XIONG Zhi-qiang, CAO Yuan, QUAN Wen-jie. GEOLOGY, GENESIS AND PROSPECTING INDICATORS OF SUNJIAGOU LEAD DEPOSIT IN LIAONING PROVINCE[J]. Geology and Resources, 2023, 32(2): 201-210. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2023.02.010

GEOLOGY, GENESIS AND PROSPECTING INDICATORS OF SUNJIAGOU LEAD DEPOSIT IN LIAONING PROVINCE

1.
Liaoning No. 6 Geological Brigade Co., Ltd., Dalian 116200, Liaoning Province, China
2.
Xuhongbin Staff Innovation Studio, Dalian 116200, Liaoning Province, China
3.
Liaoning Geological and Offshore Engineering Survey Institute Co., Ltd., Dalian 116200, Liaoning Province, China
4.
Dalian Experimental Center of Liaoning No. 6 Geological Brigade Co., Ltd., Dalian 116200, Liaoning Province, China

More Information

Corresponding author: LYU Yu, lvbo8065@163.com

Received Date: 31 August 2021

Revised Date: 11 November 2021

Publish Date: 25 April 2023

Abstract

Abstract

The Sunjiagou lead deposit is mainly hosted in the fine-medium-grained biotite granodiorites of Cengshan Unit, belonging to epithermal type, with the orebodies mainly controlled by F2 and F3 faults. The main metallic minerals of lead ore are galena and sphalerite, with minus of pyrite, chalcopyrite, etc. The ores are in idiomorphic granular, cataclastic-brecciated and vein-filled textures, with brecciated, disseminated and massive spotted structures dominated and a few massive and vein structures. The lead grade of No. 1 orebody ranges mainly from 0.314% to 1.309%, averagely 0.601%, while that of No. 2 orebody is 0.468%-1.460%, averagely 0.776%, which are delineated as low-grade lead ore according to industrial index.
- lead deposit /
- prospecting indicator /
- genesis of deposit /
- epithermal type /
- Liaoning Province

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	赵光慧, 关玉波, 赵建军. 辽宁板块构造特征及大地构造单元划分[J]. 地质与资源, 2011, 20(2): 101-106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2011.02.004 CrossRef Google Scholar Zhao G H, Guan Y B, Zhao J J. Characteristics of plate tectonics and division of geotectonic units in Liaoning region[J]. Geology and Resources, 2011, 20(2): 101-106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2011.02.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	辽宁省地质矿产局. 辽宁省区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1989: 7-270. Google Scholar Liaoning Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. Regional geology of Liaoning Province[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1989: 7-270. (in Chinese) Google Scholar
[3]	万方来, 蒋金晶, 王煊, 等. 辽宁省瓦房店金伯利岩矿区构造特征及其控矿作用[J]. 地质通报, 2019, 38(1): 62-67. Google Scholar Wan F L, Jiang J J, Wang X, et al. Geological characteristics and structural ore-control role in Wafangdian kimberlite orefield of Liaoning Province[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(1): 62-67. Google Scholar
[4]	王伟, 杨红, 冀磊. 辽南地块新太古代2.52~2.46 Ga构造-热事件的识别及地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33(9): 2775-2784. Google Scholar Wang W, Yang H, Ji L. The identification of the Neoarchean 2.52~2.46 Ga tectono-thermal events from the Liaonan terrain and its geological significance[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(9): 2775-2784. Google Scholar
[5]	李佳蓓. 嵩山地区新太古界登封群构造环境研究[D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2014: 1-87. Google Scholar Li J B. Research in tectonic evolution of Neoarchean Dengfeng Group in Songshan area[D]. Jiaozuo: Henan Polytechnic University, 2014: 1-87. Google Scholar
[6]	田毅, 余超, 王广伟, 等. 鞍山-本溪-抚顺地区新太古代地质演化探讨[J]. 地质与资源, 2015, 24(4): 301-308. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2015.04.003 CrossRef Google Scholar Tian Y, Yu C, Wang G W, et al. Discussion on the Neoarchean geological evolution in Anshan-Benxi-Fushun region[J]. Geology and Resources, 2015, 24(4): 301-308. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2015.04.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	Beus A A, Grigorian S V. Geochemical exploration methods for mineral deposits[M]. Wilmette: Applied Publishing, 1977: 1-287. Google Scholar
[8]	邵跃. 矿床元素原生分带的研究及其在地球化学找矿中的应用[J]. 地质与勘探, 1984, 20(2): 47-55. Google Scholar Shao Y. Study on primary zonation of ore deposit elements and its application in geochemical prospecting[J]. Geology and Prospecting, 1984, 20(2): 47-55. Google Scholar
[9]	李惠. 热液金矿床原生叠加晕的理想模式[J]. 地质与勘探, 1993, 29(4): 46-51. Google Scholar Li H. An ideal pattern of primary superimposed halo of hydrothermal gold deposits[J]. Geology and Exploration, 1993, 29(4): 46-51. Google Scholar
[10]	Li H, Wang Z N, Li F G. Ideal models of superimposed primary halos in hydrothermal gold deposits[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1995, 55(1/3): 329-336. Google Scholar
[11]	李惠, 张国义, 禹斌. 金矿区深部盲矿预测的构造叠加晕模型及找矿效果[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2006: 1-146. Google Scholar Li H, Zhang G Y, Yu B. Structural superposition halo model and prospecting effect of deep blind ore prediction in gold deposit area[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2006: 1-146. (in Chinese) Google Scholar
[12]	成杭新, 赵传冬, 庄广民, 等. 四川大岩子铂-钯矿床的原生地球化学异常特征及盲矿预测[J]. 地质与勘探, 2007, 43(4): 56-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0495-5331.2007.04.011 CrossRef Google Scholar Cheng H X, Zhao C D, Zhuang G M, et al. Primary geochemical anomaly and blind ore prospecting in the Dayanzi Pt-Pd deposit, Sichuan province[J]. Geology and Prospecting, 2007, 43(4): 56-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0495-5331.2007.04.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	章永梅, 顾雪祥, 程文斌, 等. 内蒙古柳坝沟金矿床原生晕地球化学特征及深部成矿远景评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(2): 209-221. Google Scholar Zhang Y M, Gu X X, Cheng W B, et al. The geochemical features of primary halo and the evaluation of deep mineralization prospect of Liubagou gold deposit, Inner Mongolia[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2010, 17(2): 209-221. Google Scholar
[14]	钱建平, 谢彪武, 陈宏毅, 等. 广西金山金银矿区成矿构造分析和构造地球化学找矿[J]. 现代地质, 2011, 25(3): 531-544. Google Scholar Qian J P, Xie B W, Chen H Y, et al. Analysis of ore-controlling structure and prospecting of tectono-geochemistry in Jinshan Au-Ag mining area, Guangxi[J]. Geoscience, 2011, 25(3): 531-544. Google Scholar
[15]	李硕, 冷昌恩, 贺战朋. 内蒙古哈达门沟金矿13号矿体地质地球化学特征[J]. 现代地质, 2012, 26(5): 1095-1103. Google Scholar Li S, Leng C E, He Z P. Geological and geochemical characteristics of Orebody 13 of Hadamengou gold deposit, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geoscience, 2012, 26(5): 1095-1103. Google Scholar
[16]	申硕果, 叶荣, 王勇. 广西贵港六梅金矿原生晕及深部找矿[J]. 现代地质, 2012, 26(5): 1086-1094. Google Scholar Shen S G, Ye R, Wang Y. The primary halo and deep prospection of Liumei gold deposit in Guigang, Guangxi[J]. Geoscience, 2012, 26(5): 1086-1094. Google Scholar
[17]	刘冲昊, 刘家军, 贾磊, 等. 陕西省略阳县铧厂沟金矿床主矿带地球化学原生晕特征及其地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2013, 27(1): 1-12. Google Scholar Liu C H, Liu J J, Jia L, et al. Primary halo research of the main ore zone in the Huachanggou gold deposit in Lüeyang, Shaanxi Province[J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(1): 1-12. Google Scholar
[18]	Wang C M, Carranza E J M, Zhang S T, et al. Characterization of primary geochemical haloes for gold exploration at the Huanxiangwa gold deposit, China[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2011, 124: 40-58. Google Scholar
[19]	玉苏普艾力·喀迪尔, 陈川, 刘雷. 新疆博格达东段多金属矿带化探原生晕与激电测量相结合的找矿效果[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(3): 713-720. Google Scholar
[20]	刘怀金, 杨永强, 孙引强, 等. 内蒙古边家大院铅锌银多金属矿床原生晕地球化学特征及深部找矿预测[J]. 地质找矿论丛, 2016, 31(2): 245-252. Google Scholar Liu H J, Yang Y Q, Sun Y Q, et al. The primary halo characteristics of Bianjiadayuan Pb-Zn-Ag polymetallic deposit in Inner Mongolia, China and ore prediction to depth[J]. Contributions to Geology and Mineral Resources Research, 2016, 31(2): 245-252. Google Scholar
[21]	叶红刚, 张德会, 余君鹏, 等. 北祁连鹰嘴山金矿床原生晕地球化学特征及深部矿体预测[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2018, 37(6): 1163-1172. Google Scholar Ye H G, Zhang D H, Yu J P, et al. Geochemical characteristics of primary halo and deep orebody prediction in the Yingzuishan gold deposit, North Qilian[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2018, 37(6): 1163-1172. Google Scholar
[22]	吴松洋, 侯林, 丁俊, 等. 贵州泥堡金矿床原生晕特征及深部找矿预测——以Ⅲ-1号矿体为例[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2018, 37(4): 674-686. Google Scholar Wu S Y, Hou L, Ding J, et al. Primary halo characteristics and deep ore body prospecting of the Nibao gold deposit, Guizhou Province: Illustrated with the example of Ⅲ-1 orebody[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2018, 37(4): 674-686. Google Scholar
[23]	张英帅, 顾雪祥, 章永梅, 等. 山东蓬莱石家金矿原生晕地球化学特征及深部找矿预测[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(1): 258-269. Google Scholar Zhang Y S, Gu X X, Zhang Y M, et al. Geochemical characteristics of primary halos and deep prospecting prediction of the Shijia gold deposit in Penglai, Shandong Province[J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(1): 258-269. Google Scholar
[24]	刘洋, 梁靓, 李荣亮, 等. 综合物探方法在甘肃某金矿勘查中的应用[J]. 矿产勘查, 2019, 10(6): 1460-1469. Google Scholar Liu Y, Liang L, Li R L, et al. Application of integrated geophysical method in exploration of a gold deposit in Gansu[J]. Mineral Exploration, 2019, 10(6): 1460-1469. Google Scholar
[25]	张家嘉, 张顺林, 汪青松, 等. 综合物探方法在覆盖区找矿中的应用——以皖东五河金矿整装勘查为例[J]. 中国地质调查, 2020, 7(6): 109-115. Google Scholar Zhang J J, Zhang S L, Wang Q S, et al. Application of comprehensive geophysical prospecting method in ore prospecting in coverage area: a case study of integrated survey area of Wuhe Gold Mine in Eastern Anhui[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2020, 7(6): 109-115. Google Scholar
[26]	涂首业. 四川会理天宝山铅锌矿矿相学特征及意义[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2014: 1-62. Google Scholar Tu S Y. The mineralography characteristics and its genetic significance of the Tianbaoshan Pb-Zn deposit in Huili, Sichuan[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014: 1-62. Google Scholar
[27]	吴小艳, 毛晓冬, 廖娟, 等. 四川会理天宝山铅锌矿床矿石显微特征及成矿期次研究[J]. 地质与资源, 2016, 25(2): 154-158. Google Scholar Wu X Y, Mao X D, Liao J, et al. Microscopic characteristics of ore and metallogenic periods of the Tianbaoshan Pb-Zn deposit in Sichuan Province[J]. Geology and Resources, 2016, 25(2): 154-158. Google Scholar
[28]	李善财, 李根军, 薛长军, 等. 青海加给陇洼东金矿地质特征及找矿预测[J]. 矿产勘查, 2019, 10(8): 1784-1791. Google Scholar Li S C, Li G J, Xue C J, et al. Geological features and prediction of Jiageilongwa gold deposit in Qumalai County, Qinghai province[J]. Mineral Exploration, 2019, 10(8): 1784-1791. Google Scholar
[29]	覃忠. 辽宁普兰店沙包镇金矿矿床地质特征及找矿标志[J]. 中国科技信息, 2011(14): 24, 27. Google Scholar Tan Z. Geological characteristics and prospecting mark of Shapaozhen gold deposit in Pulandian, Liaoning Province[J]. China Science and Technology Information, 2011(14): 24, 27. (in Chinese) Google Scholar
[30]	李巍. 辽宁省铅锌矿典型矿床特征[J]. 地质与资源, 2016, 25(3): 261-264. Google Scholar Li W. Characteristics of typical lead-zinc deposits in Liaoning Province[J]. Geology and Resources, 2016, 25(3): 261-264. Google Scholar
[31]	杨占兴, 田立臣. 辽宁省铅锌矿床成矿作用研究[J]. 辽宁地质, 1998(1): 1-19. Google Scholar Yang Z X, Tian L C. Studies on the metallogenisis of lead zinc deposits in Liaoning[J]. Liaoning Geology, 1998(1): 1-19. Google Scholar
[32]	杨占兴, 张国仁, 赵英, 等. 辽宁省成矿系列研究[J]. 地质与资源, 2006, 15(1): 25-32. Google Scholar Yang Z X, Zhang G R, Zhao Y, et al. Study on the minerogenic series in Liaoning Province[J]. Geology and Resources, 2006, 15(1): 25-32. Google Scholar
[33]	杨占兴. 辽西八家子多金属矿床的成因研究[J]. 辽宁地质, 1994(3): 193-225. Google Scholar Yang Z X. Studies on Bajiazi polymetallic ore deposit in west Liaoning[J]. Liaoning Geology, 1994(3): 193-225. Google Scholar
[34]	潘厚满. 八家子银多金属矿矿田成矿规律与成矿预测[J]. 矿产与地质, 2001, 15(85): 320-323. Google Scholar Pan H M. The ore-forming law of Bajiazi silver polymetallic ore field and its forecasting for ores-forming[J]. Mineral Resources and Geology, 2001, 15(85): 320-323. Google Scholar