Geological suitability evaluation of underground space resources based on the entropy weight optimization method

GUO Junhan; LIU Kai; DENG Yuefei; YU Chenghua

doi:10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.2-3.016

2023 Vol. 42, No. 2-3

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2023 > 42(2-3): 385-396

Next Article Previous Article

GUO Junhan, LIU Kai, DENG Yuefei, YU Chenghua. 2023. Geological suitability evaluation of underground space resources based on the entropy weight optimization method. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(2-3): 385-396. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.2-3.016

Citation:

GUO Junhan, LIU Kai, DENG Yuefei, YU Chenghua. 2023. Geological suitability evaluation of underground space resources based on the entropy weight optimization method. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(2-3): 385-396. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.2-3.016

Geological suitability evaluation of underground space resources based on the entropy weight optimization method

1.
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
2.
CIGIS(China)Limited, Beijing 100007, China
3.
Shenzhen Investigation and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518035, Guangdong, China

More Information

Corresponding author: LIU Kai, acancer@163.com

Received Date: 01 September 2022

Revised Date: 22 November 2022

Publish Date: 15 March 2023

Abstract

Abstract

Scientific and reasonable evaluation of urban underground space resources is an important basis for effectively utilizing underground space resources and preparing underground space planning.Based on the geological conditions of the development and utilization of underground space resources, this paper constructs an evaluation system of geological suitability of underground space resources based on conventional factors and sensitive factors, quantifies the index system, uses the entropy weight method to quantify the index weight, and uses AHP to optimize the entropy weight method.On this basis, the multi-objective linear weighting function method and the most unfavorable grade discrimination method are used to evaluate the geological suitability of underground space, and the Nanshan District of Shenzhen is taken as an example to evaluate the underground space resources.The evaluation results show that 47.81% of the areas with good suitability of underground space resources in Nanshan District of Shenzhen, 43.63% of areas with general suitability, only1.92% of areas with poor suitability, and 3.30% of areas with prohibited construction.The evaluation results can provide some reference for the underground space planning in Nanshan District, Shenzhen.The evaluation model and weight determination method in this paper have certain reference significance for the geological suitability evaluation of underground space resources in the future.
- underground space /
- geological suitability /
- the entropy weight optimization method /
- ArcGIS

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Admiraal H, Cornaro A. Why Underground Space Should Be Included in Urban Planning Policy-And How This Will Enhance an Urban Underground Future[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 214-220. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.013 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	Broere W. Urban underground space: Solving the problems of today's cites[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 245-248. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.012 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	Roberts D V. Sustainable development and the use of underground space [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(4): 383-390. doi: 10.1016/S0886-7798(96)00039-9 CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	Sterling R L, Nelson S. Planning the development of underground space[J]. Underground Space, 1982, 7(2): 86-103. Google Scholar
[5]	Youssef A M, Pradhan B, Tarabees E. Integrated evaluation of urban development suitability based on remote sensing and GIS techniques: contribution from the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2011, 4(3/4): 463-473. Google Scholar
[6]	Zhao J, Lee K W. Construction and Utilization of Rock Caverns in Singapore, Part C: Planning and location Selection [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(1): 81-84. doi: 10.1016/0886-7798(96)00056-9 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	陈舞, 张国华, 王浩, 等. 基于粗糙集条件信息熵的山岭隧道坍塌风险评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3549-3558. Google Scholar
[8]	陈小坤. 城市地下空间开发适宜性评价方法研究[D]. 广州大学硕士学位论文, 2022. Google Scholar
[9]	陈绪钰, 王东辉, 倪化勇, 等. 长江经济带上游地区丘陵城市工程建设适宜性评价——以泸州市规划中心城区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 194-207. Google Scholar
[10]	国家地质总局. 综合水文地质图编图方法与图例[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1979. Google Scholar
[11]	郭建民, 祝文君. 基于层次分析法的地下空间资源潜在价值评估[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2005, (5): 655-659, 664. Google Scholar
[12]	何静, 周圆心, 郑桂森, 等. 北京市地下空间资源利用地质适宜性评价研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16(4): 955-966. Google Scholar
[13]	洪文二, 严惠, 苏学权. 安庆西高铁新区工程地质评价及空间开发建议[J]. 安徽地质, 2019, 29(2): 122-127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6157.2019.02.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	胡学祥, 刘干斌, 陶海冰. 基于ArcGIS宁波市地下空间开发适宜性评价研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(6): 1439-1444. Google Scholar
[15]	黄静莉, 王清. 基于粗糙集的地下空间岩土体属性重要性评估[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2015, 11(3): 547-550, 556. Google Scholar
[16]	黄于新, 郑伟锋, 郑先昌. 深圳宝安区地下空间评估的地质环境因子评价[J]. 广东土木与建筑, 2009, 16(3): 46-49. Google Scholar
[17]	黄玉田, 张钦喜, 孙家乐. 北京市中心区地下空间资源评估探讨[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 1995, (2): 93-99. Google Scholar
[18]	建筑抗震设计规范GB50011—2010[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. Google Scholar
[19]	姜云, 吴立新, 车德福. 地下空间资源质量熵权与可变模糊集组合评估[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2009, 38(6): 872-877, 896. Google Scholar
[20]	蒋旭, 王婷婷, 穆静. 地下空间开发利用适宜性与资源量的应用研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(5): 1145-1153. Google Scholar
[21]	廖建三, 彭卫平, 林本海. 影响广州市浅层地下空间开发利用的地质因素分析及分区评价[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, (S2): 3357-3362. Google Scholar
[22]	刘健, 魏永耀, 高立, 等. 苏州城市规划区地下空间开发适宜性评价[J]. 地质学刊, 2014, 38(1): 94-97. Google Scholar
[23]	刘运来, 吴江鹏, 彭培宇, 等. 基于地质环境要素的地下空间利用适宜性评价[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(5): 58-62+67. Google Scholar
[24]	柳昆, 彭建, 彭芳乐. 地下空间资源开发利用适宜性评价模型[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2011, 7(2): 219-231. Google Scholar
[25]	马邦闯, 谭飞, 焦玉勇, 等. 基于粗糙集与AHP的地下空间开发地质适宜性评价模型构建方法研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(6): 153-159. Google Scholar
[26]	马莎, 刘聪聪, 张润华, 等. 基于熵权-层次分析法的地下空间适宜性评价[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(23): 10013-10020. Google Scholar
[27]	唐嘉锋, 魏会龙, 许大雄, 等. 深圳市南山区工程地质适宜性分区[J]. 福建建设科技, 2017, (3): 7-9. Google Scholar
[28]	童林旭. 城市地下空间资源评估与开发利用规划[M]北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009. Google Scholar
[29]	王法, 张亚芹, 王军辉, 等. 北京市中心城基坑工程地质条件适宜性评价方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(S1): 739-743. Google Scholar
[30]	王学良, 韩振华, 张路青, 等. 高放废物地质处置阿拉善预选区工程地质适宜性评价[J]. 工程地质学报, 2018, 26(6): 1715-1723. Google Scholar
[31]	王寓霖, 阳富强. 基于熵权物元可拓模型的地下空间火灾安全评价[J]. 安全, 2019, 40(1): 54-57, 61. Google Scholar
[32]	吴炳华, 张水军, 徐鹏雷, 等宁波市地下空间开发地质环境适宜性评价[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(S1): 16-21. Google Scholar
[33]	吴立新, 姜云, 车德福, 等. 城市地下空间资源质量模糊综合评估与3D可视化[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2007, (1): 97-102. Google Scholar
[34]	张玉敏. 哈尔滨市核心城区三维工程地质结构及地下空间适宜性研究[D]. 吉林大学硕士学位论文, 2012. Google Scholar
[35]	赵慧娟. 城市地下空间开发工程地质条件适宜性综合评价模型研究[D]. 南京师范大学硕士学位论文, 2018. Google Scholar
[36]	赵静, 但琦. 数学建模与数学实验[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. Google Scholar
[37]	甄艳, 鲁小丫, 李胜, 等. 城市地下空间开发利用适宜性评价[J]. 测绘科学, 2018, 43(5): 62-67, 86. Google Scholar
[38]	中华人民共和国建设部. 岩土工程勘察规范(GB50021—2011)[M]. 北京: 中华计划出版社, 2009. Google Scholar
[39]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震设计规范(GB50011—2010)[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. Google Scholar
[40]	朱恒华, 刘娅楠, 贾超, 等. 基于模糊数学和改进层次的地下空间评价[J]. 工程建设与设计, 2022, (15): 83-86. Google Scholar
[41]	祝文君, 童林旭. 北京旧城区浅层地下空间资源调查[C]//中国土木工程学会隧道及地下工程学会第七届年会暨北京西单地铁车站工程学术讨论会论文集, 1992: 54-59. Google Scholar