Grain-size variation and sedimentary environment of HS1 borehole sediments in Jizhong Depression

DONG Wanggang; YANG Zhenjing; BI Zhiwei; XU Wanjun; NING Kai; ZHAO Yuanyi

doi:10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.2-3.011

2023 Vol. 42, No. 2-3

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2023 > 42(2-3): 317-331

Next Article Previous Article

DONG Wanggang, YANG Zhenjing, BI Zhiwei, XU Wanjun, NING Kai, ZHAO Yuanyi. 2023. Grain-size variation and sedimentary environment of HS1 borehole sediments in Jizhong Depression. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(2-3): 317-331. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.2-3.011

Citation:

DONG Wanggang, YANG Zhenjing, BI Zhiwei, XU Wanjun, NING Kai, ZHAO Yuanyi. 2023. Grain-size variation and sedimentary environment of HS1 borehole sediments in Jizhong Depression. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(2-3): 317-331. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.2-3.011

Grain-size variation and sedimentary environment of HS1 borehole sediments in Jizhong Depression

1.
Key Laboratory of Quaternary Chronology and Hydrological Environment Evolution, China Geological Survey, Zhengding 050800, Hebei, China
2.
Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Zhengding 050800, Hebei, China
3.
China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
4.
Kaifeng Seismological Station, He'nan Province, Kaifeng 475004, He'nan, China

More Information

Corresponding author: YANG Zhenjing, yangzhenjing1966@163.com

Received Date: 04 August 2021

Revised Date: 28 December 2022

Publish Date: 15 March 2023

Abstract

Abstract

The grain size analysis of HS1 borehole sediments in the Jizhong Depression was carried out, and the lithofacies paleogeographic evolution process in the depression area of North China Plain represented by Jizhong Depression since 3.5 Ma BP was discussed by integrating lithology, age and biomarkers.The results demonstrate that under the conditions the long-term turbulent decline of the neotectonic movement and continuous climate change, the river facies and unstable shallow lake depression facies alternate (Late Pliocene), river facies (Early Pleistocene), river facies, sheet flow facies and short-term flood facies (Middle Pleistocene), river facies and flood plain facies alternate (Late Pleistocene), flood plain facies (Holocene) five sedimentary evolution stages, and the hydrodynamic conditions of the sediment environment are weakening, and the fine particle components are increasing.The grain size fraction content of sediments was consistent with the climate change recorded by carbon-oxygen isotope and pollen.The acceptable grain fraction content increased under cold and dry climate conditions, while the coarse grain fraction content increased under warm and humid climate conditions.Under the climate conditions between them, the change of sediment particle size is relatively gentle, and the particle size range is vast.The cyclic variation of the sedimentary environment reflected by the grain size curve is well coupled with the cold and warm evolution stages of climate divided by pollen and carbon and oxygen isotope records.It is also consistent with the relevant documents of other boreholes in the same period in North China, which is of great significance to reconstruct the paleogeographic environment in the region.
- grain size /
- sedimentary environment /
- Jizhong Depression /
- climate change

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Blaauw M. Methods and code for "classical" age-modeling of radiocarbonsequences[J]. Quaternary Geochronology, 2010, 5(5): 512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.quageo.2010.01.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	Wu C, Qian P, Zhen X M, et al. Quartz grain characteristics of the late Pleistocene hard clay in the Yangtze River delta and implications for sedimentary environment and provenance[J]. Quaternary Research, 2020, 97: 199-215. doi: 10.1017/qua.2020.31 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	毕志伟, 杨振京, 赵华, 等. 华北平原中部晚上新世以来沉积物碳氧同位素特征及其古环境意义[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2012, 28(3): 93-95. Google Scholar
[4]	陈望和, 倪明云. 河北第四纪地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1987: 1102115. Google Scholar
[5]	丁国瑜, 高維明, 黄述銀, 等. 华北平原第四纪沉积物的颜色特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质科学, 1964, (2): 143-159. Google Scholar
[6]	范保硕, 张文胜, 张茹春, 等. 华北平原小冰期以来干湿变化与人类活动特征[J]. 第四纪研究, 2019, 39(2): 483-496. Google Scholar
[7]	范淑贤, 刘海坤, 徐建明, 等. 3. 50 Ma BP以来河北衡水地区古植被与环境演化[J]. 现代地质, 2009, 23(1): 75-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2009.01.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	巩晓燕, 魏明建, 张玉华. 华北地区全新世气候时空变化特征研究述评[J]. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 27(4): 73-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9398.2006.04.016 CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	胡云壮, 杨吉龙, 李影, 等. 3 Ma以来华北地区植被演化特征及其驱动因素[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(10): 3120-3129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.10.022 CrossRef Google Scholar
[10]	黄惠玉. 滹沱河平原段现代沉积物的成分与沉积环境[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 1992, (4): 467-473. Google Scholar
[11]	纪友亮, 赵贤正, 单敬福, 等. 冀中坳陷古近系沉积层序特征及其沉积体系的演化[J]. 沉积学报, 2009, 27(1): 48-56. Google Scholar
[12]	孔冬艳, 沈华, 刘景彦, 等. 冀中坳陷束鹿凹陷横向调节带成因分析[J]. 中国地质, 2005, 32(4): 690-695. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2005.04.019 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	李海君, 张耀文, 谷洪彪. 华北平原地面沉降新构造运动影响[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2017, 15(A02): 128-134, 140. Google Scholar
[14]	李华梅, 王俊达, 安芷生. 河北衡水地区钻孔岩心的古地磁研究[J]. 地球化学, 1977, (3): 210-218. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.1977.03.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	李理, 王晶. 冀中坳陷衡水-无极构造变换带的特征及其成因机制[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2017, 41(1): 69-76. Google Scholar
[16]	李柔珂, 韩振宇, 徐影, 等. 高分辨率区域气候变化降尺度数据对京津冀地区高温GDP和人口暴露度的集合预估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(4): 491-504. Google Scholar
[17]	李艳红, 徐莉, 陈成贺日, 等. 新疆罗布泊湖盆沉积物剖面粒度与磁学特征及沉积环境[J]. 地质通报, 2014, 33(10): 1507-1513. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2014.10.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
[18]	李玉帮, 张以明, 杨德相, 等. 冀中坳陷奥陶纪岩相古地理[J]. 古地理学报, 2021, 23(2): 359-374. Google Scholar
[19]	李玉嵩, 陈建强, 赵硕, 等. 唐山地区晚更新世以来的孢粉组合特征及其与邻区的对比[J]. 地球学报, 2011, 32(2): 178-188. Google Scholar
[20]	梁富康, 刘丽萍, 于兴河, 等. 冀中坳陷深县凹陷主伸展期的构造调节带及其对沉积环境的控制作用[J]. 地质科学, 2013, 48(1): 254-262. Google Scholar
[21]	刘海金, 龚志军, 罗明, 等. 沉积物含水量及误差变化对光释光测年精度的影响研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2021, 41(1): 123-135. Google Scholar
[22]	卢海峰, 王金艳, 王瑞. 河北省衡水地区第四纪中—晚期标准地层剖面的建立及其地质含义[J]. 现代地质, 2014, 28(5): 962-970. Google Scholar
[23]	卢连战, 史正涛. 沉积物粒度参数内涵及计算方法的解析[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2010, 35(6): 54-60. Google Scholar
[24]	吕国军, 刘志辉, 张合, 等. 邢台紫山西断裂控制性钻孔第四纪孢粉组合及其古气候环境演变[J]. 华北地震科学, 2017, 35(1): 56-61. Google Scholar
[25]	倪明云, 陈望和. 河北平原第四纪重矿物的分布规律[J]. 中国科学(B辑), 1985, 12: 1139-1148. Google Scholar
[26]	牛宏, 梁杏, 李静, 马斌, 等. 衡水地区咸水层沉积物粒度及氘氧同位素的古气候指示[J]. 地球科学, 2016, 41(3): 499-507. Google Scholar
[27]	钱永, 张兆吉, 费宇红, 等. 华北平原浅层地下水可持续利用潜力分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, (8): 890-897. Google Scholar
[28]	邱亚会, 李永项, 敖红, 等. 华北早更新世哺乳动物群的磁性地层年代序列与古环境关系: 兼论对古人类活动的指示意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2018, 38(5): 1268-1292. Google Scholar
[29]	邵时雄, 安仲元, 韩书华. 河北平原新构造运动主要特征的分析[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1984, (4): 67-77. Google Scholar
[30]	沈华, 范炳达, 王权, 等. 冀中坳陷油气勘探历程与启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(3): 319-327. Google Scholar
[31]	王旭龙, 卢演俦, 李晓妮. 细颗粒石英光释光测年: 简单多片再生法[J]. 地震地质, 2005, 27(4): 615-623. Google Scholar
[32]	吴忱. 华北地貌环境及其形成演化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 1-101. Google Scholar
[33]	熊毅, 席承藩. 华北平原第四纪沉积物的性质及其演变[J]. 科学通报, 1957, 2(6): 173-173. Google Scholar
[34]	许洪才. 浅谈华北平原北部第四系沉积物的成因机制[J]. 河北地质, 2018, (1): 15-19. Google Scholar
[35]	许炯心. 基于大样本14C测年资料的华北平原沉积速率研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2007, 27(3): 437-443. Google Scholar
[36]	许清海. 华北平原不同地貌单元冲积物孢粉组合特征[J]. 科学通报, 1994, 39(19): 1792-1792. Google Scholar
[37]	杨旭升, 刘池阳, 杨斌谊, 等. 冀中坳陷衡水转换断裂带特征及演化[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2004, 32(3): 5-8. Google Scholar
[38]	易朝路, 崔之久, 熊黑钢. 中国第四纪冰期数值年表初步划分[J]. 第四纪研究, 2005, 25(5): 609-619. Google Scholar
[39]	张静, 徐建明, 刘海坤, 等. 华北平原晚更新世以来岩石地层、生物地层及气候地层[J]. 现代地质, 2009, 23(1): 64-74. Google Scholar
[40]	张亮, 刘文涛, 贾磊, 等. 海南三亚海域沉积物分布特征及其沉积环境指示[J]. 地质通报, 2021, 40(2): 341-349. Google Scholar
[41]	张培震, 王琪, 马宗晋. 中国大陆现今构造运动的GPS速度场与活动地块[J]. 地学前缘, 2002, 9(2): 430-441. Google Scholar
[42]	张文朝, 崔周旗, 韩春元, 等. 冀中坳陷老第三纪湖盆演化与油气[J]. 古地理学报, 2001, 3(1): 45-54. Google Scholar
[43]	赵红梅, 刘林敬, 赵华, 等. 滹沱河古河道晚第四纪高分辨率地层层序及沉积特征[J]. 地层学杂志, 2019, 43(4): 389-400. Google Scholar
[44]	赵红梅, 赵华, 毛洪亮, 等. 华北平原滹沱河冲洪积扇第四纪地层划分[J]. 地层学杂志, 2014, 38(2): 137-146. Google Scholar
[45]	朱宣清, 何乃华. 滹沱河现代沉积物的比重研究[J]. 沉积学报, 1984, (3): 118-123. Google Scholar