2023 Vol. 42, No. 9
Article Contents

NIU Shaowu, LIU Huan, WANG Shuqing, CHEN Yongsheng. 2023. More research of the oldest medusa-type(Cnidaria)fossils from the Wangjiatan Formationin in the Jinzhou District, Dalian city, Liaoning Province. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(9): 1581-1602. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.09.013
Citation: NIU Shaowu, LIU Huan, WANG Shuqing, CHEN Yongsheng. 2023. More research of the oldest medusa-type(Cnidaria)fossils from the Wangjiatan Formationin in the Jinzhou District, Dalian city, Liaoning Province. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(9): 1581-1602. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.09.013

More research of the oldest medusa-type(Cnidaria)fossils from the Wangjiatan Formationin in the Jinzhou District, Dalian city, Liaoning Province

  • In 1986, the soft-bodied medusoid fossils(Cnidaria or Coelenterata) were firstly found from the Wangjiatan Formation, Jinxian Group(Mesoproterozoic Era) in Qipanmo, Yangjiatun, Yangjuangou, and Zaofang-shen vallge, Jinzhou District, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, North China by Regional Geological surveying Part, Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Liaoning Province, China.Then, meduoids fossils were described by many palaeotologists.To sum up, the soft-bodied meduoid fossils from Wangjiatan Formation, Jinxian Group is more researched, including 9 genera, 9 sipecies, among them, 7 new genera and 4 new species by the auther.The soft-bodied medusoid fossils of Wangjiatan Formation is one of the three famous shale facies fossil assemblages after the Chengjiang soft-bodied metazoan, Kaili soft-bodied metazoan, and Burgess soft-bodied metazoan of the Early-Middle Cambrian Series in the world. This shale facies fossil assemblages is named as Jinzhou soft-bodied metazoan by the auther.More research of the soft-bodied medusoid fossils from the Wangjiatan Formation, Jinxian Group is of the great scientific significance in the research of origin and evolution of the metazoan.

  • 加载中
  • [1] Bouillon J et Boero F. Phylogeny and classification of Hydroimedusae[J]. Thalassia Salentina, 2000, 24: 1-296.

    Google Scholar

    [2] Foyn S, Glaessner M F. Platysolenites, others animal fossils, and the Precambrian-Cambrian trasition in Norway[J]. Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., 1979, 59: 25-46.

    Google Scholar

    [3] Glaessner M F, Wade M. The Late Precambrian Fossils From Ediacaria, South Australia[J]. Palaeontology, 1966, 9: 599-628.

    Google Scholar

    [4] Glaessner M F. The dawn of animal life-A biohistorycal study[M]. Cambrige Unuversity Press, 1984: 1-137.

    Google Scholar

    [5] Gao L Z, Zhang C H, Shi X Y, et al. A new SHRIMP age of the Xiamaling Formation in the North China Plate and its geological significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(6): 1103-1109. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2007.tb01032.x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Gao L Z, Zhang C H, Shi X Y, et al. Mesoproterozoic age for Xiamaling Formation in North China Plate indicated by zircon SHRIMP dating[J]. Chinese Scince Bulletin, 2008, 53(17): 2665-2671. doi: 10.1007/s11434-008-0340-3

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Gao L Z, Zhang C H, Liu P, et al. Reclassification of the Meso-and Newproterozoic chronosyratigraphy of North China by SHRIMP zircon age[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica 2009, 83(6): 1074-1084.

    Google Scholar

    [8] Sun W G. Precambrian Medusoids: The Cyclomedusa Plexus and Cyclomedusa-like pseudofossils[J]. Precambrian Research, 1986a, 31: 325-360. doi: 10.1016/0301-9268(86)90039-2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Sun W G. Late Precambrian Panatulids(sea pans)from the eastern Yangtze Gorge, China: Paracharnia gen. nov[J]. Precambrian Research, 1986b, 31(4): 361-375. doi: 10.1016/0301-9268(86)90040-9

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Zhu S X, Zhu M Y, Andrew H, et al. Decimetre-scale multicellular eukaryotes from the 1.56-billion-year-old Gaoyuzhuang Formation in North China[J]. Nature, Communications, 2016, 7: 11500. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11500

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Zhang X, Hua H, Joachim R. A new type of Precambrian megascopic fossils: the Jinxian biotafrom northeastern China[J]. Facies, 2006: 52: 169-181.

    Google Scholar

    [12] Федонкин М А. Беломорская биота Венда. (Докембрийская бесекелетная фауна севера Росской Платформы), Академия Наук СССР, труды, вып. 1981, 342: 1-99.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 卜德安. 辽东半岛南部晚前寒武纪叠层石特征及其地质意义[J]. 中国地质科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊, 1984, 第10号: 64-106.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 陈孟峩. 辽东半岛南部晚前寒武纪五行山群南关岭组中的宏体化石[J]. 地质科学, 1990, 4: 315-323.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 高林志, 张传恒, 史晓颖, 等. 华北古陆下马岭组归属中元古界的SHRIMP年龄新证据[J]. 科学通报, 2008, 53(21): 2617-2623.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 高林志, 张传恒, 陈寿铭, 等. 辽东半岛细河群沉积碎屑锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2010, 29(8): 1113-1122.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 高林志, 丁孝忠, 乔秀夫, 等. 中国东部中—新元古代地层同位素年代学研究进展[C]//孙枢, 王铁冠. 中国东部中—新元古界地质学与油气资源. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 25-50.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 洪作民, 黄镇福, 杨欣德, 等. 辽南震旦系兴民村组发现后生动物化石[J]. 辽宁地质, 1986, 4: 289-296.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 洪作民, 刘效良. 辽宁南部复州-大连凹陷震旦系兴民村组、葛屯组发现后生生物化石[J]. 中国区域地质, 1987, 2: 145-147.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 洪作民, 黄镇福, 杨欣德, 等. 辽南震旦系兴民村组类水母化石[J]. 地质学报, 1988, 3: 200-209.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 洪作民. 辽南上先寒武系地质研究进展及其意义[J]. 辽宁地质, 1989, (1): 87-96.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 李怀坤, 朱士兴, 相振群, 等. 北京延庆高于庄组凝灰岩的U-Pb定年研究及其对华北北部中元古界划分新方案的进一步约束[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(7): 2131-2140.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 林蔚兴, 张丕孚, 马俊孝, 等. 辽东半岛南部晚前寒武纪地层的研究[J]. 中国地质科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊, 1984, 第10号: 1-50.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 柳永清, 高林志, 刘燕学, 等. 徐淮地区新元古代初期镁铁质岩浆事件的锆石U-Pb定年[J]. 科学通报, 2005, 50(22): 2514-2521.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 刘凌云, 郑光美. 普通动物学(第4版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2016: 1-302

    Google Scholar

    [26] 牛绍武, 王敏成, 董洪年. Cyclomedusa等水母类化石在辽南金县震旦系中的发现及其意义[J]. 中国地质科学院天津地质矿产研究所所刊, 1988, 第19号: 75-94.

    Google Scholar

    [27] 牛绍武. 上前寒武系划分与国内外对比. 国外前寒武纪地质[J]. 中国科学院天津地质矿产研究所所刊, 1996, 4: 8-20.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 牛绍武, 辛后田. 辽东半岛南部中新元古界地层的重新厘定[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2012, 35(1): 1-15.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 牛绍武, 辛后田. 青白口系的区域对比与金州系的建立[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2013a, 36(1): 1-8.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 牛绍武, 辛后田, 林晓辉. 华北地台南缘苏-鲁-皖地区中-新元古界的重新划分与对比[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2013b, 36(3): 161-172.

    Google Scholar

    [31] 牛绍武, 辛后田, 王树庆. 中-朝地台南华系的内涵、厘定及其意义[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2017, 40(4): 241-252.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 牛绍武, 辛后田, 刘欢, 等. 论中国拉伸纪淮南系的建立[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2018, 41(4): 241-257.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 欧志吉, 孟凡巍. 辽南前寒武系兴民村组"类水母"化石新认识[J]. 微体古生物学报, 2013, 30(1): 99-106.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 乔秀夫, 高林志, 彭阳. 古郯庐带新元古界——灾变、层序、生物[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2001: 1-126.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 张世红, 周红英, 万渝生. 铁岭组钾质斑脱岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年代学研究及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2010, 55(22): 2197-2206.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 苏文博, 李怀坤, Huff W D, 等. 铁岭组钾质斑脱岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年代学研究及其地质意义[J]. 科学通报, 2010, 55(22): 2197-2206.

    Google Scholar

    [37] 孙卫国, 侯先光. 云南澄江早寒武世水母化石[J]. 古生物学报, 1987, 26(3): 257-271.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 唐烽, 尹崇玉, 高林志, 等. 华北克拉通东部新元古代宏体化石生物地层序列[J]. 地质论评, 2009, 55(3): 305-317.

    Google Scholar

    [39] 王敏成. 辽宁大连震旦纪水母[J]. 长春地质学院学报, 1991, 21(3): 259-268.

    Google Scholar

    [40] 邢裕盛, 刘桂芝, 乔秀夫, 等. 中国的上前寒武系。中国地层(3)[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1989: 1-314.

    Google Scholar

    [41] 许振祖, 黄加祺, 林茂, 等. 中国刺胞动物门水螅虫总纲(上下册)[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2014: 1-945.

    Google Scholar

    [42] 杨进辉, 吴福元, 张艳斌, 等. 辽东半岛南部三叠纪辉绿岩中发现新元古代年龄[J]. 科学通报, 2004, 49(18): 1878-1882.

    Google Scholar

    [43] 朱士兴, 杜汝霖. 冀西北涿鹿下花园一带下马岭组叠层石的研究[C]//中国地质科学院地质研究所. 地层古生物论文集. 1980, 8: 62-76.

    Google Scholar

    [44] 朱士兴. 中国叠层石[M]. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 1993: 3-14.

    Google Scholar

    [45] 朱士兴, 邢裕盛, 张鹏远, 等. 华北地台中、上元古界生物地层序列[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1994: 1-251.

    Google Scholar

    [46] 朱士兴, 李怀坤, 孙立新, 等. 燕辽裂陷带中—新元古界地层序列和划分[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 51-88.

    Google Scholar

    [47] 朱茂炎. 全球新元古代沉积地层研究现状[C]//孙枢、王铁冠中国东部中—新元古界地质学与油气资源. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 3-24.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(10)

Article Metrics

Article views(1479) PDF downloads(212) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint