Diagenetic and mineralization chronology study of the Wujiaping tin ore deposit in Nanling Range

XIA Jie; LU Youyue; FU Jianming; ZHANG Zunzun; CHENG Shunbo; LI Jianfeng; NING Yongyun; FENG Jingping; ZHANG Jitao

doi:10.12097/gbc.2022.04.041

2024 Vol. 43, No. 4

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2024 > 43(4): 572-581

Next Article Previous Article

XIA Jie, LU Youyue, FU Jianming, ZHANG Zunzun, CHENG Shunbo, LI Jianfeng, NING Yongyun, FENG Jingping, ZHANG Jitao. 2024. Diagenetic and mineralization chronology study of the Wujiaping tin ore deposit in Nanling Range. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(4): 572-581. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2022.04.041

Citation:

XIA Jie, LU Youyue, FU Jianming, ZHANG Zunzun, CHENG Shunbo, LI Jianfeng, NING Yongyun, FENG Jingping, ZHANG Jitao. 2024. Diagenetic and mineralization chronology study of the Wujiaping tin ore deposit in Nanling Range. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(4): 572-581. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2022.04.041

Diagenetic and mineralization chronology study of the Wujiaping tin ore deposit in Nanling Range

1.
Research Center for Petrogenesis and Mineralization of Granitoid Rocks, China Geological Survey, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China
2.
Wuhan Center, China Geological Survey (Geosciences Innovation Center of Central South China), Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China
3.
College of Geographical Sciences, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China
4.
Natural Resources Survey Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha 410014, Hunan, China

More Information

Corresponding author: LI Jianfeng, 317649474@qq.com

Received Date: 25 April 2022

Revised Date: 12 August 2022

Publish Date: 15 April 2024

Abstract

Abstract

Wujiaping tin ore deposit is a greisen-type deposit with medium-sized prospect scale newly discovered in Dayishan area in recent years. The orebody occurs as a vein in the Dayishan compound granite body and is controlled by NE-trending faults. In order to determine its diagenetic and metallogenic age, summarize the metallogenic regularity in Dayishan area, and guide regional prospecting and exploration, the LA-ICP-MS zircon U−Pb dating of medium-coarse grained porphyritic biotite monzonitic granite (PM21-19) and medium-fine grained porphyry biotite monzonitic granite (PM21-27) in ore-bearing surrounding rocks was studied. The diagenetic ages of 157.1 ± 1.1 Ma (MSWD=0.55) and 153.7 ± 1.2 Ma (MSWD=0.55) are obtained, which belong to the early Yanshanian period. At the same time, the Rb−Sr isochron age of quartz in the greisen-type tin ore is 148.1 ± 2.1 Ma (MSWD = 0.52). Combined with the regional data, the diagenetic and metallogenic age of Wujiaping tin ore deposit is the early Yanshanian period, which belongs to the peak of Mesozoic diagenesis and mineralization(160~150 Ma) in Nanling region.
- zircon U–Pb dating /
- quartz Rb-Sr dating /
- tin ore deposit /
- Wujiaping /
- Nanling Range /
- mineral survey engineering

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Guo J, Lu Y Y, Fu J M, et al. 2019. Geology and Geochronology of the Maozaishan Sn Deposit, Hunan Province: Constraints from Zircon U–Pb and Muscovite Ar–Ar Dating[J]. Minerals, 9(12): 773−789. doi: 10.3390/min9120773 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	Liu Y S, Hu Z C, Gao S, et al. 2008. In situ analysis of major and trace elements of an hydrous mineral by LA−ICP−MS without applying an internal standard[J]. Chemical Geology, 257(1): 34−43. Google Scholar
[3]	Lu Y Y, Cao J Y, Fu J M, et al. 2021. Petrogenesis of the granite related to the Dashunlong Sn polymetallic deposit, Dayishan ore field, South China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 139: 104478. Google Scholar
[4]	Lu Y Y, Li J F, Cao J Y, et al. 2022. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Late Jurassic Wujiaping Sn deposit, Dayishan ore field, South China: Implications to the petrogenesis and Sn mineralization[J]. Solid Earth Sciences, 7(1): 72−86. Google Scholar
[5]	Mao J W, Cheng Y B, Chen M H, et al. 2013. Major types and time–space distribution of mesozoic ore deposits in south china and their geodynamic settings[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 48(3): 267−294. doi: 10.1007/s00126-012-0446-z CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	Sun H R, Zhao Z, Yan G S, et al. 2018. Geological and Geochronological Constraints on the Formation of the Jurassic Maozaishan Sn Deposit, Dayishan Orefield, South China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 94: 212−224. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.01.033 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	Wang D H, Huang F, Wang Y, et al. 2020. Regional metallogeny of Tungsten−tin−polymetallic deposits in Nanling region, South China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, doi. org/10.1016/j. oregeorev. 2019.103305. Google Scholar
[8]	Zhang Z Z, Ning Y Y, Lu Y Y, et al. 2021. Geological characteristics and metallogenic age of Tengshan’ao Sn deposit in Dayishan of South Hunan and its prospecting significance[J]. Solid Earth Sciences, 6: 37–49. Google Scholar
[9]	蔡明海, 陈开旭, 屈文俊, 等. 2006. 湘南荷花坪锡多金属矿床地质特征及辉钼矿Re−Os测年[J]. 矿床地质, 25(3): 263−268. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2006.03.005 CrossRef Google Scholar
[10]	陈骏, 王汝成, 朱金初, 等. 2014. 南岭多时代花岗岩的钨锡成矿作用[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 44(1): 111−121. Google Scholar
[11]	程顺波, 刘飞, 秦拯纬, 等. 2023. 赣南牛岭钨矿床成岩成矿年代学及成矿构造背景[J]. 华南地质, 39(2): 349−362. Google Scholar
[12]	付建明, 程顺波, 卢友月, 等. 2012. 南岭地区钨锡多金属矿成矿规律及找矿方向[J]. 地球科学进展, 7(S1): 162−164. Google Scholar
[13]	付建明, 马丽艳, 程顺波, 等. 2013. 南岭地区锡(钨)矿成矿规律及找矿[J]. 高校地质学报, (2): 202−212. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2013.02.005 CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	郭春丽, 王登红, 陈毓川, 等. 2007. 赣南中生代淘锡坑钨矿区花岗岩锆石SHRIMP年龄及石英脉Rb−Sr年龄测定[J]. 矿床地质, 26(4): 432−442. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2007.04.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	贺文华. 2011. 湖南大义山地区锡多金属矿成矿模式初探[J]. 华南地质与矿产, 27(1): 14−20. Google Scholar
[16]	何军成, 刘军, 王晓彤, 等. 2023. 辽东新岭铅锌银矿床成因: 来自锆石U−Pb年龄、闪锌矿Rb−Sr年龄和H−O−S−Pb−He同位素证据[J]. 矿床地质, 42(2): 331−346. doi: 10.16111/j.0258-7106.2023.02.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
[17]	湖南省地质矿产勘查开发局四一八队. 2017. 湖南省常宁市吴家坪矿区锡多金属矿预查报告[R]. Google Scholar
[18]	华仁民, 陈培荣, 张文兰, 等. 2005. 论华南地区中生代3次大规模成矿作用[J]. 矿床地质, 24(2): 99−107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2005.02.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
[19]	侯可军, 李延河, 田有荣. 2009. LA−MC−ICP−MS锆石微区原位U−Pb定年技术[J]. 矿床地质, 28(4): 481−492. Google Scholar
[20]	李勇, 张岳桥, 苏金宝, 等. 2015. 湖南大义山、塔山岩体锆石U−Pb年龄及其构造意义[J]. 地球学报, 36(3): 303−312. Google Scholar
[21]	李剑锋, 卢友月, 张遵遵, 等. 2023. 南岭大义山岩体研究与找矿进展[J]. 地球科学, 48(10): 3707−3724. Google Scholar
[22]	刘铁生, 2002. 大义山矿田岩体型锡矿地质特征及矿床成因[J]. 中国地质, 29(4): 411−415. Google Scholar
[23]	刘艳荣, 关强兵, 张海东, 等. 2023. 大兴安岭西坡二道河子铅锌矿床硫化物Rb−Sr、锆石U−Pb年龄及其对构造背景的制约[J]. 地质通报, 42(11): 1843−1853. Google Scholar
[24]	彭和求, 伍光英. 2000. 湘南"大义山式构造"的厘定及地质意义[J]. 湖南地质, 19(2): 87−89. Google Scholar
[25]	彭建堂, 胡瑞忠, 袁顺达, 等. 2008. 湘南中生代花岗质岩石成岩成矿的时限[J]. 地质论评, 54(5): 617−625. Google Scholar
[26]	孙敬博, 张立明, 陈文, 等. 2013. 东天山红石金矿床石英Rb−Sr同位素定年[J]. 地质论评, 59(2): 382−388. Google Scholar
[27]	王登红, 陈郑辉, 黄国成, 等. 2012. 华南“南钨北扩”、“东钨西扩”及其找矿方向探讨[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 36(3): 322−329. Google Scholar
[28]	王登红, 陈振宇, 黄凡, 等. 2014. 南岭岩浆岩成矿专属性及相关问题探讨[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 38(2): 230−238. Google Scholar
[29]	魏俊浩, 刘丛强, 李志德, 等. 2003. 论金矿床成矿年代的确定——以丹东地区成岩成矿Rb−Sr、U−Pb同位素年代为例[J]. 地质学报, 77(1): 113−119. Google Scholar
[30]	吴福元, 郭春丽, 胡方泱, 等. 2023. 南岭高分异花岗岩成岩与成矿[J]. 岩石学报, 39(1): 1−36. Google Scholar
[31]	伍光英, 潘仲芳, 李金冬, 等. 2005. 湘南大义山花岗岩地质地球化学特征及其与成矿的关系[J]. 中国地质, 32(3): 434−442. Google Scholar
[32]	谢桂青, 赵海杰, 赵财胜, 等. 2009. 鄂东南铜绿山矿田矽卡岩型铜铁金矿床的辉钼矿Re−Os同位素年龄及其地质意义[J]. 矿床地质, 28(3): 227−239. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2009.03.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[33]	袁顺达. 2017. 南岭钨锡成矿作用几个关键科学问题及其对区域找矿勘查的启示[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 36(45): 736−749. Google Scholar
[34]	张晓军, 罗华, 吴志华, 等. 2014. 湖南大义山矿田白沙子岭锡矿床Rb−Sr同位素等时线年龄及其地质意义[J]. 地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 39(10): 1422−1432. Google Scholar
[35]	张遵遵, 张吉梼, 蔺东永, 等. 2022. 南岭成矿带大义山藤山坳锡矿床花岗岩成因及锡成矿作用的指示[J]. 华南地质, 38(3): 441−458. Google Scholar
[36]	赵增霞, 徐兆文, 左昌虎, 等. 2017. 湖南桂阳大义山南体(太坪山单元)花岗岩形成时代及物质来源探讨[J]. 地质论评, 63(2): 395−412. Google Scholar