Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological SciencesHost
Advanced Search
Previous Article Next Article
2023 Vol. 29, No. 3
Article Contents
Article navigation > Journal of Geomechanics > 2023 > 29(3): 301-312
Next Article Previous Article

CAI Meifeng. 2023. A brief talk on comprehensive crustal activity observation technology of deep-holes. Journal of Geomechanics, 29(3): 301-312. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20232901
Citation: CAI Meifeng. 2023. A brief talk on comprehensive crustal activity observation technology of deep-holes. Journal of Geomechanics, 29(3): 301-312. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20232901
shu

A brief talk on comprehensive crustal activity observation technology of deep-holes

  • School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

    • Fund Project: This research is financially supported by the China Geological Survey Project (Grant DD20230249，DD20230014) and the Key Consultation Project of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (Grant 2019-XZ-16).
More Information
  • Author Bio: 蔡美峰，教授，博士生导师，中国工程院院士，岩石力学与采矿工程专家，自然资源部北京地壳应力应变野外科学观测研究站学术委员会主任。长期从事地应力测量与科学采矿方向研究，首次开发出我国具有自主知识产权的地应力测量技术，提出了以地应力为基础的采矿设计优化的技术体系、安全高效开采技术和矿山动力灾害预测与防控技术，撰写了我国第一部系统介绍地应力测量的专著《地应力测量原理和技术》，是我国矿山地应力测量的主要开拓者之一。获国家科技进步二等奖4项、三等奖1项，国家技术发明三等奖1项和国家级教学成果二等奖1项。2008—2010年先后被评为国家级教学名师、全国模范教师和全国优秀科技工作者。曾担任国务院学位委员会矿业工程学科评议组召集人、国际岩石力学学会教育委员会主席、中国岩石力学与工程学会副理事长、中国金属学会常务理事兼采矿分会理事长等职务，积极总结我国矿山地质科技成就和经验，提出多项建设性意见或建议，为我国深部矿山地质科技事业发展做出了重大贡献
Received Date:  10 April 2023
Revised Date:  10 May 2023
Publish Date:  28 June 2023
    Abstract

  • Under the action of the Earth’s inner dynamics, the lithosphere shapes different types of the Earth’s surface, and the crustal stress state and its dynamic change law are captured by the comprehensive observation technology of drilling crustal activity. It is an important way for human beings to understand the internal dynamic process of the Earth and study the mechanism of inner dynamic geological hazards. The contribution of developed countries such as Japan, the USA, and the IODP International Cooperative Research Program to the development of integrated borehole crustal observation technology is summarized in this paper. The paper also systematically reviews the development history and present situation of borehole strain observation technology and borehole strain observation instrument in China. Especially since the 13th Five-Year, under the background of the national strategy of deep-sea exploration, the China Geological Survey Bureau (CGS), the China Earthquake Administration, and other systems have successively carried out research and development of the integrated geophysics observation system in wells, and have been put into use in integrated land and sea observation stations. The Institute of Geomechanics has successfully developed an integrated geophysics observation system for crustal activity using the key techniques of system integration. The system has a variety of strain, tilt, seismic, geomagnetic, geothermal, pore pressure, other sensors, and 16 components capable of observing crustal deformation, stress, strain, tilt, earthquake, and their induced geodynamic changes in the lithosphere, such as geotemperature, hydrology, geoelectricity, geomagnetism, etc. It has been put into use in Shandan (installed depth 253 m) and Pingwu (WFSD-4, 1600 m) observatories in Gansu and Sichuan provinces and has achieved initial results. It is a milestone for our comprehensive crustal activity observation technology to break through the 3000-meter-deep well in the future. It can provide vital information for geodynamics research, safe exploitation of deep mineral and geothermal resources, and prediction of internal dynamic geological hazards. At the same time, based on the national strategy of deep-sea exploration in the 14th Five-year, the future development direction of integrated observation system of deep-well crustal activity is pointed out.

    • FullText(HTML)
  • 加载中
    • References
  • [1] CAI M F, JI D, GUO Q F, 2013. Study of rockburst prediction based on in-situ stress measurement and theory of energy accumulation caused by mining disturbance[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 32(10): 1973-1980. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [2] CAI M F, 2020. Key theories and technonogies for surrounding rock stability and ground control in deep mining[J]. Journal of Mining and Strata Control Engineering, 2(3): 033037. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [3] CAI M F, DUO J, CHEN X S, et al. , 2021. Development strategy for co-mining of the deep mineral and geothermal resources[J]. Chinese Strategic Study of CAE, 23(6): 43-51. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [4] CAI M F, MA M H, PAN J L, et al. , 2022. Co-mining of mineral and geothermal resources: a state-of-the-art review and future perspectives[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 44(10): 1669-1681. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [5] CHEN X L, ZHANG Y L, CAI W X, 1989. Continuous crustal movement observation technique[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [6] CHI S L, 1977. Continuous self-recording pressure volume geostress meter[C]//Selected papers of national geostress conference (II). 369-373. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [7] CHI S Y, 1982. Preliminary experimental result of a capacitance-type bore-hole earth strain meter[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 4(1): 98-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [8] FENG C J, LI B, LI H, et al. , 2022. Estimation of in-situ stress field surrounding the Namcha Barwa region and discussion on the tectonic stability[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(6): 919-937,doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20222820. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] G T 163, MGMR, 1971. Summary of steel string gauge survey[J]. Earthquake Front, 3. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [10] GLADWIN M T, 1984. High-precision multicomponent borehole deformation monitoring[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 55(12): 2011-2016. doi: 10.1063/1.1137704

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] GLADWIN M T, HART R, 1985. Design parameters for borehole strain instrumentation[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 123(1): 59-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00877049

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] HART R H G, GLADWIN M T, GWYTHER R L, et al. , 1996. Tidal calibration of borehole strain meters: removing the effects of small-scale inhomogeneity[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 101(B11): 25553-25571. doi: 10.1029/96JB02273

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] HICKMAN S, ZOBACK M, ELLSWORTH W, 2004. Introduction to special section: preparing for the San Andreas fault observatory at depth[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(12): L12S01.

    Google Scholar

    [14] ISHII H, 2001. Development of new multi-component borehole instrument[J]. Report of Tono Research Institute of Earthquake Science, 6: 5-10. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar

    [15] ISHII H, YAMAUCHI T, MATSUMOTO S, et al. , 2002. Development of multi-component borehole instrument for earthquake prediction study: some observed examples of precursory and co-seismic phenomena relating to earthquake swarms and application of the instrument for rock mechanics[M]//ANDO M. Seismogenic process monitoring. London: Routledge: 365-377.

    Google Scholar

    [16] JIANG J X, YIN G H, HASIGAOWA, 2000. Recordings in bore-hole strainmeter before earthquake and earthquake prediction[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 23(4): 410-417. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [17] JIANG J X, WANG Z H, LI C, et al. , 2003. Borehole strain anomaly and strong earthquake activity in Xinjiang[J]. Inland Earthquake, 17(2): 126-133. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [18] JIANG J X, YIN G H, WANG Z H, et al. , 2004. Statistical character of steping change anomality of component-type borehole strain and its application to earthquake prediction in Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 23(23): 4072-4078. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [19] JIANG J X, YIN G H, WU G D, 2012. Study of Xinjiang relative stress field based on continuous borehole stress and strain data[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 31(1): 154-163. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [20] KINOSHITA M, BECKER K, TOCZKO S, et al. , 2018a. Expedition 380 methods[C]//Proceedings of the international ocean discovery program. College Station: International Ocean Discovery Program.

    Google Scholar

    [21] KINOSHITA M, BECKER K, TOCZKO S, et al. , 2018b. Site C0006[C]//Proceedings of the international ocean discovery program. College Station: International Ocean Discovery Program.

    Google Scholar

    [22] KOKO ISHII, 2001. Development and observation of a new borehole integrated observation device for crustal activity[J]. Dongnon Institute of Earthquake Science(6): 5-10. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [23] KOPF A, SAFFER D, TOCZKO S, 2017. Expedition 365 summary[C]//Proceedings of the international ocean discovery program. College Station: International Ocean Discovery Program.

    Google Scholar

    [24] LI H L, MA H J, ZHANG J, et al. , 2004. The design of FZY-1 type multi-component borehole strain meter[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 25(1): 69-77. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [25] LI M W, 1987. The soil layer stress precursors of the Wuqia earthquake (Ms=7.4)[J]. Inland Earthquake, 1(1): 77-83. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [26] LIU W H, ZHENG J W, ZHAO J D, et al. , 2019. Management mechanism and enlightenment of ocean drilling programs[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D, 41(1): 77-87. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [27] LUO M J, GU M L, LI A Y, et al. , 1989. Borehole strain--stress calibration in the same place by use of tidal generation force[J]. Crustal Deformation and Earthquake, 9(4): 51-62. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [28] LUO M J, TANG J A, 2016. Calculation of subsurface strain and stress using four-component borehole strain observations[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 38(S1): 8-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [29] Ma X Y, 1987. Summary of the lithospheric dynamics in China [J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, (2): 113-125.

    Google Scholar

    [30] MENG W, TIAN T, SUN D S, et al. , 2022. Research on stress state in deep shale reservoirs based on in-situ stress measurement and rheological model[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(4): 537-549,doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2022041. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] OUYANG Z X, 1977. RDB-1 capacitive ground strain gauge[C]//Selected papers of national geostress conference (II). Beijing: Seismological Press: 337-348. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [32] OUYANG Z X, 1983. A high precision capacitance borehole strain measurement system[C]//Selected papers of the second national conference on geostress. Beijing. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [33] OUYANG Z X, 1986. High-precision component borehole strain gauge developed[J]. Earthquake(2): 61. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [34] OUYANG Z X, ZHANG Z R, 1988. Studies of method for coupling strainmeter and borehole wall[C]//Tectonic and crustal stress collection (2). Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [35] OUYANG Z X, ZHANG Z R, SHU G L, 2004. Review and outlook for West China borehole strainmeter networks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 23(23): 4058-4062. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [36] OUYANG Z X, ZHANG J, CHEN Z, et al. , 2009. New progress in multi-component observation of crustal deformation in deep boreholes[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology(11): 1-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [37] OUYANG Z X, 2013. Research on in-situ calibration technique of RZB borehole strainmeters[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 33(1): 153-156. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [38] PAN L Z, 1980. Directional measurement of ground stress and ground strain [J]. Journal of Mechanics and practice, 20-33. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [39] PAN L Z, 1986. Borehole deformation method for in-situ stress measurement of multi-contact preloaded elements [J]. 29(5): 468-481. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [40] PENG H, MA X M, JIANG J J, et al. , 2011a. Research and demonstration report on combined stress-strain multi-parameter automatic monitoring technology of borehole[R]. Beijing: Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [41] PENG H, MA X M, JIANG J J, et al. , 2011b. Development report of integrated geophysical monitoring system for middle-deep Wells[R]. Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [42] QIU Z H, ZHANG B H, 2002. Current Situation of the seismological networks for borehole stress-strain precursor surveilance in China[J]. Recent Developments In World Seismology(6): 5-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [43] QIU Z H, XIE F R, SU K Z, et al. , 2004. New era of borehole strain observation[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology(1): 7-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [44] QIU Z H, SHI Y L, OUYANG Z X, 2005a. Absolute calibration of 4-component borehole strainmeters[J]. Earthquake, 25(3): 27-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [45] QIU Z H, SHI Y L, OUYANG Z X, 2005b. Relative in-situ calibration of 4-component borehole strain observation[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 25(1): 118-122. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [46] QIU Z H, ZHOU L S, CHI S L, 2009. Study on precursory strain changes of Wenchuan earthquake with ORA method[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 29(4): 1-4, 9. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [47] QIU Z H, ZHANG B H, CHI S L, et al. , 2011. Abnormal strain changes observed at Guza before the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 54(2): 233-240. doi: 10.1007/s11430-010-4057-1

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] QIU Z H, TANG L, LU F L, et al. , 2012. Technique of strain observation in soil with self-checking function[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 32(6): 152-155, 159. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [49] QIU Z H, YANG G, TANG L, et al. , 2015. Abnormal strain changes prior to the M7.0 Lushan earthquake observed by a borehole strainmeter at Guzan[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 35(1): 158-161, 166. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [50] SACKS I S, EVERTSON D W, 1971. Sensitive borehole strain-rate meter[J]. Carnegie Inst, Washington Yearb, 68: 448-453.

    Google Scholar

    [51] SACKS I S, SUYEHIRO S, EVERTSON D W, et al. , 1971. Sacks-Evertson strainmeter, its installation in Japan and some preliminary results concerning strain steps[J]. Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics, 22(3-4): 195-208. doi: 10.2467/mripapers1950.22.3-4_195

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] SAFFER D, KOPF A, TOCZKO S, et al. , 2017. Expedition 365 methods[C]//Proceedings of the international ocean discovery program. College Station: International Ocean Discovery Program.

    Google Scholar

    [53] SAKATA S, 1981. On the concepts of some newly-invented borehole three-component strainmeters[J]. Report of the National Research Center for Disaster Prevention, 25: 95-126. (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [54] SU K Z, LI G R, ZHANG T, et al. , 1977. Minor volume borehole strainmeter[J]. Inland Earthquake, 11(4): 316-322. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [55] SU K Z, 1985. Present state of relative field stress observation and its prospects[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 1(4): 42-47. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [56] SU K Z, LI X H, ZHANG J, et al. , 2002. Manufacture of TJ-2 volume stain meter[J]. Proceedings of Crustal Tectonics and Crustal Stress(15): 113-121. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [57] SU K Z, 2003. Status and developments of borehole strain observations in China[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 24(1): 65-69. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [58] SU K Z, LI H L, ZHANG J, et al. , 2003a. New progress in in-situ strain observation of borehole[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [59] SU K Z, MA H J, LI H L, et al. , 2003b. Designs of built-up strainmeter[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 26(2): 164-171. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [60] SU K Z, ZHANG J, LI X H, et al. , 2005. The effect of borehole environment at borehole deformation observation[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 26(6): 46-55. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [61] SU K Z, 2020. Forty years of four-component borehole strain gauge in China[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 41(2): 172-180. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [62] SUN D S, CHEN Q C, ZHANG Y Q, 2020. Analysis on the application prospect of ASR in-situ stress measurement method in underground mine[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(1): 33-38,doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.003. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [63] TADASHI S S, 1985. Continuous observation of crustal movement[J]. Journal of the Society of Geodesy, 31(1): 34-45. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [64] UNSWORTH M, BEDROSIAN P A, 2004. Electrical resistivity structure at the SAFOD site from magnetotelluric exploration[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(12): L12S05,doi: 10.1029/2003GL019405.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [65] WALLACE L M, ARAKI E, SAFFE D, et al. , 2016. Near-field observations of an offshore MW 6.0 earthquake from an integrated seafloor and subseafloor monitoring network at the Nankai Trough, southwest Japan[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(11): 8338-8351. doi: 10.1002/2016JB013417

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [66] WANG C H, GAO G Y, WANG H, et al. , 2020. Integrated determination of principal stress and tensile strength of rock based on the laboratory and field hydraulic fracturing tests[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(2): 167-174. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [67] WANG Q M, FENG X S, MA H J, et al. , 1982. A borehole strain gauge has been developed by Henan seismological bureau to record earth's solid tide[J]. Progress in Earthquake Sciences(1): 32. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [68] WANG Q M, TONG Y H, 1987. High precision borehole strain measurement in our country[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 5(S1): 321-327. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [69] WU Z L, WANG L, CHE S, et al. , 2021a. China seismic experimental site (CSES): planning and test[J]. Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 52(3): 348-352. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [70] WU Z L, WANG L, LI L, et al. , 2021b. China seismic experimental site (CSES): earthquake forecast and system design[J]. Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 52(6): 679-683. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [71] WU Z L, DING Z F, ZHANG X D, et al. , 2021c. China seismic experimental site: retrospective and prospective[J]. Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 52(2): 234-238. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [72] XIE F R, CHEN Q C, 1999. Observations and researches of crustal stress[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology(2): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [73] XU J R, ZHAO Z X, 2006. Advances and prospects for long term geophysical observation in deep borehole [J]. Earth Science –Journal of China University of Geosciences, 31(4): 557-563. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [74] YE J L, ZHANG W, XIE W W, 2019. Preliminary thoughts on implementation of the ocean drilling project in China[J]. Exploration Engineering (Rock & Soil Drilling and Tunneling), 46(2): 1-8 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [75] ZHANG H, SHI G, WU H, et al. , 2020. In-situ stress measurement in the shallow basement of the Shanghai area and its structural geological significance[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(4): 583-594. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    [76] ZOBACK M D, HICKMAN S H, ELLSWORTH W L, 1998. Scientific drilling into the San Andreas fault at Parkfield, CA: project overview and operational plan[R]. Stanford: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar

    [77] 蔡美峰, 冀东, 郭奇峰, 2013. 基于地应力现场实测与开采扰动能量积聚理论的岩爆预测研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 32(10): 1973-1980.

    Google Scholar

    [78] 蔡美峰, 2020. 深部开采围岩稳定性与岩层控制关键理论和技术[J]. 采矿与岩层控制工程学报, 2(3): 033037.

    Google Scholar

    [79] 蔡美峰, 多吉, 陈湘生, 等, 2021. 深部矿产和地热资源共采战略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 23(6): 43-51.

    Google Scholar

    [80] 蔡美峰, 马明辉, 潘继良, 等, 2022. 矿产与地热资源共采模式研究现状及展望[J]. 工程科学学报, 44(10): 1669-1681.

    Google Scholar

    [81] 陈鑫连, 张奕麟, 蔡惟鑫, 1989. 地壳变动连续观测技术[M]. 北京: 地震出版社.

    Google Scholar

    [82] 池顺良, 1982. 压容式钻孔应变仪的初步试验结果[J]. 地震学报, 4(1): 98-103.

    Google Scholar

    [83] 丰成君, 李滨, 李惠, 等, 2022. 南迦巴瓦地区地应力场估算与构造稳定性探讨[J]. 地质力学学报, 28(6): 919-937,doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616. 20222820.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [84] 蒋靖祥, 尹光华, 哈斯高娃, 2000. 钻孔应变仪在地震前的记录及地震预测[J]. 地震研究, 23(4): 410-417.

    Google Scholar

    [85] 蒋靖祥, 王在华, 李川, 等, 2003. 新疆钻孔应变异常与强震活动[J]. 内陆地震, 17(2): 126-133.

    Google Scholar

    [86] 蒋靖祥, 尹光华, 王在华, 等, 2004. 新疆分量式钻孔应变阶变异常的统计特征及其在地震预测中的应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 23(23): 4072-4078.

    Google Scholar

    [87] 蒋靖祥, 尹光华, 吴国栋, 2012. 基于钻孔应力、应变连续实测资料研究新疆相对应力场[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 31(1): 154-163.

    Google Scholar

    [88] 李海亮, 马鸿钧, 张钧, 等, 2004. FZY-1型多分量式钻孔应变仪的设计[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 25(1): 69-77.

    Google Scholar

    [89] 李茂玮, 1987. 乌恰7.4级地震的土层应力前兆[J]. 内陆地震, 1(1): 77-83.

    Google Scholar

    [90] 刘文浩, 郑军卫, 赵纪东, 等, 2019. 大洋钻探计划管理机制及启示[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 41(1): 77-87.

    Google Scholar

    [91] 骆鸣津, 顾梦林, 李安印, 等, 1989. 用引潮力进行钻孔的应变-应力的原地标定[J]. 地壳形变与地震, 9(4): 51-62.

    Google Scholar

    [92] 骆鸣津, 唐九安, 2016. 四分量钻孔应变观测值计算地层应变与应力[J]. 地震工程学报, 38(S1): 8-15.

    Google Scholar

    [93] 马杏垣, 1987. 中国岩石圈动力学概要[J]. 地质学报, (2): 113-125.

    Google Scholar

    [94] 孟文, 田涛, 孙东生, 等, 2022. 基于原位地应力测试及流变模型的深部泥页岩储层地应力状态研究[J]. 地质力学学报, 28(4): 537-549,doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2022041.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [95] 欧阳祖熙, 1977. RDB-1型电容式地应变计[C]//全国地应力专业会议论文选编(下). 北京: 地震出版社: 337-348.

    Google Scholar

    [96] 欧阳祖熙, 1986. 高精度分量式钻孔应变仪研制成功[J]. 地震(2): 61.

    Google Scholar

    [97] 欧阳祖熙, 张宗润, 1988. 钻孔应变仪与井壁耦合方法的研究[C]//地壳构造与地壳应力文集(2). 北京: 地震出版社.

    Google Scholar

    [98] 欧阳祖熙, 张宗润, 舒桂林, 2004. 中国西部钻孔应变仪台网工作回顾与前瞻[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 23(23): 4058-4062.

    Google Scholar

    [99] 欧阳祖熙, 张钧, 陈征, 等, 2009. 地壳形变深井综合观测技术的新进展[J]. 国际地震动态(11): 1-13.

    Google Scholar

    [100] 欧阳祖熙, 2013. RZB型钻孔应变仪原位标定技术研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 33(1): 153-156.

    Google Scholar

    [101] 潘立宙, 1980. 地应力与地应变的定向测量[J]. 力学与实践, 20-33.

    Google Scholar

    [102] 潘立宙, 1986. 多触点预压式元件的钻孔变形法地应力测量[J]. 29(5): 468-481.

    Google Scholar

    [103] 彭华, 马秀敏, 姜景捷, 等, 2011a. 钻孔组合式应力--应变多参数自动监测技术研究与示范成果报告[R]. 北京: 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所.

    Google Scholar

    [104] 彭华, 马秀敏, 姜景捷, 等, 2011b. 中深井综合地球物理监测系统研制报告[R]. 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所.

    Google Scholar

    [105] 邱泽华, 张宝红, 2002. 我国钻孔应力-应变地震前兆监测台网的现状[J]. 国际地震动态(6): 5-9.

    Google Scholar

    [106] 邱泽华, 谢富仁, 苏恺之, 等, 2004. 发展钻孔应变观测的战略构想[J]. 国际地震动态(1): 7-14.

    Google Scholar

    [107] 邱泽华, 石耀霖, 欧阳祖熙, 2005a. 四分量钻孔应变观测的实地绝对标定[J]. 地震, 25(3): 27-34.

    Google Scholar

    [108] 邱泽华, 石耀霖, 欧阳祖熙, 2005b. 四分量钻孔应变观测的实地相对标定[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 25(1): 118-122.

    Google Scholar

    [109] 邱泽华, 周龙寿, 池顺良, 2009. 用超限率分析法研究汶川地震的前兆应变变化[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 29(4): 1-4, 9.

    Google Scholar

    [110] 邱泽华, 张宝红, 池顺良, 等, 2010. 汶川地震前姑咱台观测的异常应变变化[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 40(8): 1031-1039.

    Google Scholar

    [111] 邱泽华, 唐磊, 卢法林, 等, 2012. 一种可以自检的土层应变观测技术[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 32(6): 152-155, 159.

    Google Scholar

    [112] 邱泽华, 杨光, 唐磊, 等, 2015. 芦山M7.0地震前姑咱台钻孔应变观测异常[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 35(1): 158-161, 166.

    Google Scholar

    [113] 石井紘, 2001. 新钻孔地壳活动综合观测装置的开发和观测[J]. 东浓地震科学研究所报告(6): 5-10.

    Google Scholar

    [114] 苏恺之, 李桂荣, 张涛, 等, 1977. 小型化体积式钻孔应变仪[J]. 内陆地震, 11(4): 316-322.

    Google Scholar

    [115] 苏恺之, 1985. 地应力相对观测的现状及发展方向[J]. 中国地震, 1(4): 42-47.

    Google Scholar

    [116] 苏恺之, 李秀环, 张钧, 等, 2002. TJ-2型体应变仪的研制[J]. 地壳构造与地壳应力文集(15): 113-121.

    Google Scholar

    [117] 苏恺之, 2003. 我国钻孔应变观测的回顾与展望[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 24(1): 65-69.

    Google Scholar

    [118] 苏恺之, 李海亮, 张钧, 等, 2003a. 钻孔地应变观测新进展[M]. 北京: 地震出版社.

    Google Scholar

    [119] 苏恺之, 马鸿钧, 李海亮, 等, 2003b. 组合式应变观测仪的设计[J]. 地震研究, 26(2): 164-171.

    Google Scholar

    [120] 苏恺之, 张钧, 李秀环, 等, 2005. 钻孔环境在钻孔地形变观测中的作用[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 26(6): 46-55.

    Google Scholar

    [121] 苏恺之, 2020. 中国四分量钻孔应变仪风雨历程四十年[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 41(2): 172-180.

    Google Scholar

    [122] 孙东生, 陈群策, 张延庆, 2020. ASR法在井下矿山地应力测试中的应用前景分析[J]. 地质力学学报, 26(1): 33-38,doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616. 2020.26.01.003.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [123] 王成虎, 高桂云, 王洪, 等, 2020. 利用室内和现场水压致裂试验联合确定地应力与岩石抗拉强度[J]. 地质力学学报, 26(2): 167-174.

    Google Scholar

    [124] 王启民, 冯先水, 马鸿钧, 等, 1982. 河南省地震局研制出记录到地球固体潮的钻孔应变仪[J]. 国际地震动态(1): 32.

    Google Scholar

    [125] 王启民, 童月华, 1987. 我国的高精度钻孔应变测量[J]. 华北地震科学, 5(S1): 321-327.

    Google Scholar

    [126] 吴忠良, 王龙, 车时, 等, 2021a. 中国地震科学实验场: 认识与实践[J]. 地球与行星物理论评, 52(3): 348-352.

    Google Scholar

    [127] 吴忠良, 王龙, 李丽, 等, 2021b. 中国地震科学实验场: 地震预测与系统设计[J]. 地球与行星物理论评, 52(6): 679-683.

    Google Scholar

    [128] 吴忠良, 丁志峰, 张晓东, 等, 2021c. 中国地震科学实验场: 历史与未来[J]. 地球与行星物理论评, 52(2): 234-238.

    Google Scholar

    [129] 谢富仁, 陈群策, 1999. 地壳应力观测与研究[J]. 国际地震动态(2): 1-7.

    Google Scholar

    [130] 徐纪人, 赵志新, 2006. 深井地球物理长期观测的最新进展及其前景[J]. 地球科学 ——中国地质大学学报, 31(4): 557-563.

    Google Scholar

    [131] 叶建良, 张伟, 谢文卫, 2019. 我国实施大洋钻探工程的初步设想[J]. 探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程), 46(2): 1-8.

    Google Scholar

    [132] 张浩, 施刚, 巫虹, 等, 2020. 上海地区浅部地应力测量及其构造地质意义分析[J]. 地质力学学报, 26(4): 583-594.

    Google Scholar

    • Relative Articles
  • Cited by
  • Supplements
    • Proportional views
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(7)

Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(1015) PDF downloads(20) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020