Citation: | SUN Zhangtao, YU Zhengwei, SHU Siqi, XU Chuangsheng, SHU Yang. 2023. Evaluation of ecosystem services of Chinese provincial land and suggestions for ecological geological survey[J]. Geology in China, 50(2): 479-494. doi: 10.12029/gc20221027001 |
This paper is the result of ecological geological survey engineering.
It is the common responsibility of all countries to protect the ecological environment and promote the sustainable development. The nationwide evaluation of ecosystem service is conducive to the promotion of ecological environment protection and the establishment of the modernization of harmonious coexistence between human and nature.
The study on the evaluation of ecosystem service has become a hot topic in the field of ecological sciences. Based on the evaluation method of ecosystem service proposed by Costanza et al. in 2014, this study establishes a dynamic evaluation model of ecosystem service by using the Consumer Price Index, the Purchasing Power Indexes of US dollar and Chinese RMB, which is used to evaluate the ecological system services of Chinese provincial land with the data of the Third National Land Survey, and studies the spatial distribution of ecosystem service value of Chinese provincial land via Hotspot analysis technique.
The value of ecological system services of Chinese mainland in 2019 is 35.79 trillion RMB. Qinghai province is located in a hotspot area, Heilongjiang province is located in a sub-hotspot area, Guizhou province and Chongqing municipality are located in sub-Coldspot, and Shannxi Province is located in Coldspot area.
In terms of the geological background and ecological characteristics of the so-called "Two Zones and Three Belts" which involve the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, Northeast zone, Yellow River basin, Yangtze River basin, and coastal zone, we propose to carry out the integrated ecological geological survey of mountain, water, forest, cropland, lake, grass, and sand. The first is to carry out investigation on glacier melting and permafrost thaw, degradation of grasslands and desertification of land in Qinghai-Tibet area. The second is to carry out investigation on forest quality, ecological diversity, and wetland resources in Northeast China. The third is to carry out investigation on ecological degradation in the upstream, water and soil loss in the midstream, and the wetlands shrinkage in the downstream of the Yellow River. The fourth is to carry out investigation on water conservation in the upstream, the rocky desertification and soil erosion of Karst area in the midstream, and wetlands degradation in the downstream of the-Yangtze River. The fifth is to focus on the investigation of typical marine ecosystems such as coastal erosion and mangroves.
Bi Xiaoli, Ge Jianping. 2004. Evaluating ecosystem service valuation in China based on the IGBP land cover datasets[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 22(1): 48-53(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2004.01.009 |
Cai Zhonghua, Wang Qing, Liu Guangqing. 2014. Value re-evaluation for ecosystem services of China[J]. Ecological Economy, 30(2): 16-23(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2014.02.004 |
Cao Shixiong, Liu Yujie, Su Wei, Zheng Xinyi, Yu Zhongqi. 2018. The net ecosystem services value in mainland China[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 48(3): 331-339(in Chinese). |
Cheng Zhongxin, Zhang Xinshi. 2000. The value of China ecological benifits[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 45(1): 17-22(in Chinese). doi: 10.1360/csb2000-45-1-17 |
Costanza R, d'Arge R, Groot R D, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Suttonkk P, Belt M V D. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 387: 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0 |
Costanza R, Groot R D, Sutton P, Ploeg S V D, Anderson S J, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner R K. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 26: 152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 |
Daily G C. 1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washionton D C: Island Press, 1-100. |
Du Leshan, Li Junsheng, Liu Gaohui, Zhang Fengchun, Xu Jing, Hu Lile. 2016. Progress in the researches on the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity(TEEB)[J]. Biodiversity Science, 24(6): 686-693(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.17520/biods.2016033 |
Huang Runqiu. 2001. Basic characteristics and technical support of the eco-environmental geology[J]. Geology in China, 28(11): 20-24(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2001.11.005 |
He Hao, Pan Yaozhong, Zhu Wenquan, Liu Xulong, Zhang Qing, Zhu Xiufang. 2005. Measurement of terrestrial ecosystem service value in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 16(6): 1122-1127(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2005.06.029 |
Jiang Yuehua, Ni Huayong, Zhou Quanping, Cheng Zhiyan, Duan Xuejun, Zhu Zhimin, Wu Jichun, Ren Haiyan, Fan Chenzi, Yang Jinwei, Chen Chao, Hu Jian, Wang Xiaolong, Jiang Xiaye, Liu Yongbing, Yang Hai, Guo Wei, Feng Naiqi, Wei Guangqing, Jin Yang, Yang Hui, Liu Lin, Mei Shijia, Zhang Hong, Chen Pengjun, Yuan Jihai, Qi Qiuju, Lü Jinsong, Gu Xuan, Liu Peng. 2021. Key technology of ecological restoration demonstration in the Yangtze River Economic Zone and its application[J]. Geology in China, 48(5): 1305-1333(in Chinese with English abstract). |
Kuaiyi Finance Network. 2023. Purchase power parity and GNP data camparision between China and USA[EB/OL]. |
Li Jinfa. 2004. The geological survey serving ecologial civilization[J]. Resources Environment & Engineering, 28(1): 1-4(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1211.2004.01.001 |
Liu Huayan, Xiao Wenfa, Li Qi, Tian Yu, Zhang Qianru, Zhu Jianhua. 2021. Spatiotemporal variations and trade-offs of ecosystem services in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 40(1): 209-219(in Chinese with English abstract). |
Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke, Miao Hong. 1999. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 19(5): 607-613(in Chinese with English abstract). |
Shi Y, Wang R S, Huand J L, Yang W R. 2012. An analysis of the spatial and temporal changes in Chinese terrestrial ecosystem service functions[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(17): 2120-2131. doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-4978-5 |
Shu Siqi, Zhang Hongtao, Pei Rongfu, Xiang Junfeng, Sun Zhangtao. 2017. Quaternion model for sustainable exploration and development of mines (QMM)[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 36(8): 1476-1482(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2017.08.017 |
The Government of the People's Republic of China. 2021. The Third National Land Survey Main Data Bulletin[EB/OL]. |
The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. 2021. Main Data Bulletin of the Third National Land Survey[EB/OL]. |
The Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China. 2019. Technical Regulation of the Third Nationwide Land survey(TD/T1055-2019)[R]. |
United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development[EB/OL]. |
Trading Ecnomics. 2022. USA-Consumer Price Index CPI. |
Wang Jingbing, Wei Xiaofeng, Zhang Huiqiong, Gan Fengwei. 2020. The eco-geological survey based on geological formation, exemplified by integrated geological survey of National Ecological Civilization Demonstration Area in Chengde City, Hebei Province[J]. Geology in China, 47(6): 1611-1624(in Chinese with English abstract). |
Wang Qi'an, Liu Qinhuo. 2022. The 2021 Report on Remote Sensing Monitoring of Global Ecological Environment[M]. Beijing: Serveying and Mapping Publishing House, 1-94(in Chinese). |
Wang Yao, Chen Ruishan, Xia Zilong, Guo Chihui. 2020. The evaluation of ecosystem service value and its spatial change in the Yellow River Basin and suggestions from the ecological geology perspectives[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 39(10): 1650-1662(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2020.10.015 |
Wang Yao, Chen Ruishan, Guo Chihui, Xia Zilong. 2021. Changes of resource and environmental pattern of the Yellow River Basin in the past 40 years and suggestions on geological work[J]. Geology in China, 48(1): 1-20(in Chinese with English abstract). |
Xi Jinping. 2022. Hold High the Great Banner of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and Strive in Unity to Build a Modern Socialist Country in All Respects-Report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China[M]//The Writing Group, the Tutorial book for the Report of the 20th National Congress of Cummunist Party of China. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1-64. |
Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Leng Yunfa, Zheng Du, Li Shuangcheng. 2003. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 18(2): 189-196(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2003.02.010 |
Xie Gaodi, Zhang Caixia, Zhang Leiming, Chen Wenhui, Li Shimei. 2015. Improvement of the Evaluation Method for Ecosystem Service Value Based on Per Unit Area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 30(8): 1243-1253(in Chinese with English abstract). |
Zhang Pengyan, Geng Wenliang, Yang Dan, Li Yanyan, Zhang Yu, Qin Mingzhou. 2020. Spatial-temporal evolution of land use and ecosystem service value in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 36(11): 277-288. |
Zhang Xiaoyao, Lu Lin, Yu Hu, Zhang Xiao, LI Donghua. 2021. Multi-scenario simulation of the impacts of land-use change on ecosystem service value on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 40(3): 887-898(in Chinese with English abstract). |
Zhao Shidong, Zhang Yongmin. 2006. Ecosyetem and human well being: the achievements, contributions and prospects of the millennium ecosystem assessment[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 21(9): 895-902(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2006.09.002 |
Zhu Dianzhen, Chu Lei, Ma Shuai, Wang Liangshi, Zhang Jinchi. 2021. Trade off and synergistic relationship among ecosystem services of the ecological barrier zone in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 28(4): 308-31(in Chinese with English abstract). |
毕晓丽, 葛剑平. 2004. 基于IGBP土地覆盖类型的中国陆地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 山地学报, 22(1): 48-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2004.01.009 |
蔡中华, 王晴, 刘广青. 2014. 中国生态系统服务价值的再计算[J]. 生态经济, 30(2): 16-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2014.02.004 |
曹世雄, 刘玉洁, 苏蔚, 郑鑫怡, 余中淇. 2018. 中国陆地生态系统服务净价值评估[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 48(3): 331-339. |
陈仲新, 张新时. 2000. 中国生态系统效益的价值[J]. 科学通报, 45(1): 17-22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2000.01.004 |
中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 2021. 第三次全国国土调查主要数据公报[EB/OL]. |
杜乐山, 李俊生, 刘高慧, 张风春, 徐靖, 胡理乐. 2016. 生态系统与生物多样性经济学(TEEB)研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 24(6): 686-693. |
黄润秋. 2001. 生态环境地质的基本特点与技术支撑[J]. 中国地质, 28(11): 20-24. |
何浩, 潘耀忠, 朱文泉, 刘旭拢, 张晴, 朱秀芳. 2005. 中国陆地生态系统服务价值测量[J]. 应用生态学报, 16(6): 1122-1127. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2005.06.029 |
姜月华, 倪化勇, 周权平, 程知言, 段学军, 朱志敏, 吴吉春, 任海彦, 范晨子, 杨晋炜, 陈超, 胡建, 王晓龙, 姜夏烨, 刘永兵, 杨海, 郭威, 冯乃琦, 魏广庆, 金阳, 杨辉, 刘林, 梅世嘉, 张鸿, 陈澎军, 袁继海, 齐秋菊, 吕劲松, 顾轩, 刘鹏. 2021. 长江经济带生态修复示范关键技术及其应用[J]. 中国地质, 48(5): 1305-1333. |
快易理财网. 2023. 中国、美国历年购买力平价GNP(国民生产总值)数据比较[EB/OL]. |
李金发. 2004. 为生态文明服务的地质调查工作[J]. 资源环境与工程, 28(1): 1-4. |
联合国. 2015. 变革我们的世界: 2030年可持续发展议程[EB/OL]. |
刘华妍, 肖文发, 李奇, 田宇, 张倩如, 朱建华. 2021. 北京市生态系统服务时空变化与权衡分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 40(1): 209-219. |
欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 1999. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 19(5): 607-613. |
舒思齐, 张洪涛, 裴荣富. 2017. 矿业可持续勘查开发"四元"模型(QMM)[J]. 地质通报, 36(8): 1476-1482. |
王京彬, 卫晓锋, 张会琼, 甘凤伟. 2020. 基于地质建造的生态地质调查方法——以河北省承德市国家生态文明示范区综合地质调查为例[J]. 中国地质, 47(6): 1611-1624. |
王琦安, 柳钦火. 2022. 全球生态环境遥感监测2021年度报告[M]. 北京: 测绘出版社, 1-50. |
王尧, 陈睿山, 夏子龙, 郭迟辉. 2020. 黄河流域生态系统服务价值变化评估及生态地质调查建议[J]. 地质通报, 39(10): 1650-1662. |
王尧, 陈睿山, 郭迟辉, 夏子龙. 2021. 近40年黄河流域资源环境格局变化分析与地质工作建议[J]. 中国地质, 48(1): 1-20. |
习近平. 2022. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M]//本书编写组. 党的二十大报告辅导读本. 北京: 人民出版社, 1-64. |
谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 郑度, 李双成. 2003. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 18(2): 189-196. |
谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 陈文辉, 李士美. 2015. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 30(8): 1243-1253. |
张鹏岩, 耿文亮, 杨丹, 李颜颜, 张宇, 秦明周. 2020. 黄河下游地区土地利用和生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J]. 农业工程学报, 36(11): 277-288. |
张晓瑶, 陆林, 虞虎, 张潇, 李冬花. 2021. 青藏高原土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值影响的多情景模拟[J]. 生态学杂志, 40(3): 887-898. |
赵士洞, 张永民. 2006. 生态系统与人类福祉——千年生态系统评估的成就、贡献和展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 21(9): 895-902. |
中华人民共和国自然资源部. 2019. 第三次全国国土调查技术规程(中. T. T. 1055-2019)[S]. |
朱殿珍, 初磊, 马帅, 王良杰, 张金池. 2021. 青藏高原生态屏障区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J]. 水土保持研究, 28(4): 308-315. |
Percentage of different ecosystem areas in China mainland
The pattern of Chinese provincial forest ecosystem
The pattern of Chinese provincial grass ecosystem
The pattern of Chinese provincial wetland ecosystem
The pattern of Chinese provincial fresh water ecosystem
The pattern of Chinese provincial cropland water ecosystem
The pattern of Chinese provincial urban water ecosystem
The national distribution of ecosystem service value of unit area in China mainland
Distribution of hotspot of ecosystem service value in China mainland