2020 Vol. 47, No. 6
Article Contents

SU Hejun, WANG Zongli, CAO Lingling, ZHANG Hui, LI Chenhua, ZHOU Huiling. 2020. The application of measurement method of soil gas from fault zone to fault activity study: A case study of Jiayuguan fault[J]. Geology in China, 47(6): 1894-1903. doi: 10.12029/gc20200623
Citation: SU Hejun, WANG Zongli, CAO Lingling, ZHANG Hui, LI Chenhua, ZHOU Huiling. 2020. The application of measurement method of soil gas from fault zone to fault activity study: A case study of Jiayuguan fault[J]. Geology in China, 47(6): 1894-1903. doi: 10.12029/gc20200623

The application of measurement method of soil gas from fault zone to fault activity study: A case study of Jiayuguan fault

    Fund Project: Supported by the project of"Special Project for Earthquake Monitoring and Prediction of CEA (No. ZX2017031) and Natural Science Foundation of Gansu, China (No. 1606RJYA218)"
More Information
  • Author Bio: SU Hejun, male, born in 1973, associate researcher, mainly engages in the study of fault gas and isotope geochemistry; E-mail:suhejun@126.com
  • Corresponding author: CAO Lingling, female, born in 1972, associate researcher, mainly engages in the study of using underground fluid to predict earthquake; E-mail:caoll@gsdzj.gov.cn 
  • In order to determine whether the increase of gas radon concentrations at the monitoring point of the Jiayuguan fault since June 2015 can reflect the stronger activity of the Jiayuguan fault or not, the authors applied the cross-fault measurement method based on the typical distribution pattern of soil gas across faults and analyzed comprehensively the relationship between the abnormal changes of gas radon concentrations and the fault activity through multi-component correlation analyzing and theoretical modeling. The results show that the concentrations of CO2, CH4, and H2 from the same monitoring point do not increase during the rapid increase of the gas radon concentrations from the monitoring point of the fault. There is no positive correlation between them. The adding of gas radon concentration does not come from deep crust and it does not mean the stronger activity of the Jiayuguan fault. The results of the gas radon measurement across faults which lie on both sides of the monitoring point show that the gas radon concentrations are different, and this is consistent with the typical distribution pattern of fault gas on the unchanged side of the surface environment but it does not conform to the typical distribution pattern of fault gas on the changed side of the surface environment. The increase of gas radon concentrations is correspondingly with the change of the surface environment in time. Therefore, the increase of gas radon concentration at the fault monitoring point is caused by the change of the surface environment, and the activity of the Jiayuguan fault does not increase. This method provides a thinking for the improvement of reliability in using fault soil gas to judge fault activity.

  • 加载中
  • Che Yongtai, Liu Yaowen, He Lan. 2015. Hydrogen monitoring in fault zone soil gas——A new approach to short/immediate earthquake prediction[J]. Earthquake, 35(4):1-10(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Ciotoli G, Lombarsi S, Annunziatellis A. 2007. Geostatistical analysis of soil gas data in a high seismic intermontane basin:Fucino Plain, central Italy[J]. Journal Geophysical Research, 112, B5:5407. doi: 10.1029/2005JB004044

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Du Letian. 2008. The exhausting of the earth[J]. China Population.Resources and Environment, 18(S):694-599(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Du Jianguo, Wang Xianbin, XieHongsen. 1994. Mantal degassing -A Gasgeochemical feature of deep Earth matter movement[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 9(3):48-52(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Du Jianguo, Yu Wenxin, Li Shengqiang, Jian Chunlin, Zhu Ziqiang. 1998. The geochemical characteristics of escaped radon from the Babaoshanfault zone and its earthquake reflecting effect[J]. Earthquake, 18(2):155-162(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Fu Chingchou, Yang Tsanyao Frank, Jane Du, Vicek Walia, Chen Yuegau, Liu Tsungkwei, Chen Chenghong. 2008. Variations of helium and radon concentrations in soil gases from an active fault zone in southern Taiwan[J].Radiation Measurements, 43(S1):S348-S352.

    Google Scholar

    Han Xiaokun, Li Ying, Du Jianguo, Zhou Xiaocheng, Li Xiaoqiang. 2013. Geochemical characteristics of soil gas in the central south segment of Xiadian Fault[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exloration, 37(6):976-982(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    He Chaofeng, Chen Zhoufeng, Qi Xin, Wang Qiuliang, LinYazhou. 2016. Study on soil radon features and activity analysis of the Macheng-Tuanfeng fault[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 36(6):504-512(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    He Genqiqo, Zhang Bi'ao, Miao Yuanmo.1989.Discussion of the microgas distribution and recent activity of Aerjin Fault[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 11(1):16-20(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    He Wengui, Yuan Daoyang, Wang Aiguo, Liang Mingjian, Zheng Wenjun. 2010. The recent active characteristics of the Middle Segment of Jiayuguan Fault[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 26(3):296-303(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Le Renchang, JiaWenyi, He Zhijie. 2006. An experimental study on long distancemigration of reason in the air[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 33(5):536-540(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Liu Jinghua, Wang Zhuwen. 2009. Numerical simulation of the soil radon concentration distribution in the overburden above active faults[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 24(2):644-650(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Liu Xueling, Ma Jianying, Yang Xulian, Ren Feng, Li Yibin.2011.Validity study of fault gas detection method in detecting deep buried active faults[J]. Earthquake, 31(1):67-84(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Meng Guangkui, He Kaimin, Ban Tie, Jiao Decheng. 1997. Study on activity and segmentation of active fault using measurments of radon and mercury gases[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 13(1):43-51(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Scholz, Christopher H. 2002. The Mechanics of Earthquake and Faulting[M]. 2nd ed..Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 504.

    Google Scholar

    Su Hejun, Zhang Hui, Li Chenhua, Wu Jianbo, Zhou Huiling.2016.Geochemical features of fault gas on Northern margin fault of Xiqinling and its seismic hazard analysis[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 35(3):671-676(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Sun Xiaolong, Wang Guangcai, Shao Zhigang, Si Xueyun. 2016.Geochemical characteristics of emergent gas and groundwater in Haiyuan fault zone[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 233(3):140-150(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Toutain J P, Baubron J C. 1999. Gas geochemistry and seismotectonics:a review[J].Tectonophysics, 304(2/1):1-27.

    Google Scholar

    VicekWalia, Su T C, Fu C C, Yang T F. 2005. Spatial variations of radon and helium concentrations in soil-gas across the ShanChiao fault, Northern Taiwan[J]. Radiation Measurements, 40(2/6):513-516.

    Google Scholar

    Wang Jiang, Li Ying, Chen Zhi. 2017. Gas geochemistry and activity of the Kouquan fault in Shanxi Province[J].Earthquake, 37(1):39-51(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Wang XiLong, Li ying, Du Jianguo, Chen Zhi, Zhou Xiaocheng, Li Xinyan, Cui Yuejun, Wang Haiyan, Zhang Zhihong. 2017.Geochemical characteristics of soil gases Rn, Hg and CO2 and their genesis in the capital area of China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 39(1):85-101(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Wu Huishan, Bai Yunshan, LinYufei, et al.1997.The action of relay transmission of the radon migraton[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 40(1):136-142(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Wu Jianbo, Zhang Hui, Su Hejun. 2014. Numerical simulation for migration rule of fault gas radon in different overburden[J]. Acta Seismological Sinica, 36(1):118-128(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Xu Xiwei, GuoTingting, Liu Shaozhuo, Yu Guihua, Chen Guihua, Wu Xiyan. 2016. Discussion on issues associated with setback distance from active fault[J].Seismology and Geology, 38(3):477-502(in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    Xu Xiwei, Zhao Boming, Ma Shengli. 2011. Method and Application of Active Fault Earthquake Disaster Prediction[M]. Beijing:Science Press.305(in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    Xu Yongchang, Shen Ping, Liu Wenhui. 1996. Volatile natural gas geochemistry of mantle-derived in eastern Oil and Gas area -ⅡVolatile in the mantle helium, argon and carbon compounds[J]. Science in China(Series D), 26(2):187-192(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar

    Yan Xianchen, Zhang Zeng, Wang Changling. 1987. Characteristics of gas components in the overlying soil on active faults[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 1987, 3(4):52-60(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar

    Yang T F, Chou C Y, Chen C H, Chyi L L, Jiang J H. 2003. Exhalation of radon and its carrier gases in SW Taiwan[J]. Radiation Measurements, 36(1/6):425-429.

    Google Scholar

    Zhang Hui, Zhang Xinji, Su Hejun, Liu Xuzhou.2010.Field test on the geochemical features of radon and mercury from soil gas on the active faults in Lanzhou[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal, 23(3):273-278(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Zhang Peizhen, Deng Qidong, Zhang Guomin, MA Jing, Gan Weijun, Min Wei, Mao Fengying, Wang Qi. 2003. Active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the continent of China[J].Science in China(D), 46(S2):13-24(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar

    Zhang Hui, Su Hejun, Li Chenhua. 2013. Field test on the geochemical detection of concealed fault In Hezuocity[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 35(3):618-624(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    Zhu Jinfang, Huang Zonglin, Xu Xiwei, Zheng Rongzhang, Fang Shengming, Bai Denghai, Wang Guangcai, Minwei, Wen Xueze, Han Zhujun.2005.Active faults exploration and seismic hazard assessment in Fuzhou City[J].Earthquake Research in China, 21(1):1-16(in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    车用太, 刘耀炜, 何镧.2015.断层带土壤气中H2观测——探索地震短临预报的新途径[J].地震, 35(4):1-10.

    Google Scholar

    杜建国, 王先彬, 谢鸿森.1994.深部物质运动的气体地球化学特征[J].地球科学进展, 9(3):48-52.

    Google Scholar

    杜建国, 宇文欣, 李圣强, 简春林, 朱自强. 1998.八宝山断裂带逸出氡的地球化学特征及其映震效能[J].地震, 18(2):155-162.

    Google Scholar

    杜乐天. 2008.地球排气作用[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 18(S):594-599.

    Google Scholar

    韩晓昆, 李营, 杜建国, 周晓成, 李小强.2013.夏垫断裂中东南段土壤气地球化学特征[J].物探与化探, 37(6):976-982.

    Google Scholar

    何超枫, 陈州丰, 齐信, 王秋良, 林亚洲. 2016.麻城-团风断裂带土氡特征及活动性研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学, 36(6):504-512.

    Google Scholar

    何跟巧, 张必敖, 缪元模. 1989.阿尔金断裂微量气体分布与断层现今活动性讨论[J].西北地震学报, 11(1):16-20.

    Google Scholar

    何文贵, 袁道阳, 王爱国, 梁明剑, 刘兴旺, 郑文俊. 2010.嘉峪关断层中段的新活动特征[J].中国地震, 26(3):296-303.

    Google Scholar

    乐仁昌, 贾文懿, 何志杰. 2006.氡在空气中长距离试验研究[J].成都理工大学学报, 33(5):536-540.

    Google Scholar

    刘菁华, 王祝文. 2009.活断层上覆盖层中土壤氡浓度分布的数值模拟[J].地球物理学进展, 24(2):644-650.

    Google Scholar

    刘学领, 马建英, 杨绪连, 任峰, 李一兵. 2011.断层气探测方法在隐伏活动断层探测中的有效性研究[J], 地震, 31(1):67-84.

    Google Scholar

    孟广魁, 何开明, 班铁, 焦德成. 1997.氡、汞测量用于断裂活动和分段的研究[J].中国地震, 13(1):43-51.

    Google Scholar

    苏鹤军, 张慧, 李晨桦, 伍剑波, 周慧玲. 2013.秦岭北缘断裂带断层气浓度空间分布特征与强震危险性分析[J].地震工程学报, 35(3):671-676.

    Google Scholar

    孙凯男, 郭秋菊, 程建平. 2005.土壤物理性质对土壤氡浓度及地表析出率的影响[J].中华放射医学及防护杂志, 25(1):78-80.

    Google Scholar

    孙小龙, 王广才, 邵志刚, 司学芸. 2016.海源断裂带土壤气与地下水地球化学特征研究[J].地学前缘, 23(3), 140-150.

    Google Scholar

    王江, 李营, 陈志. 2017.口泉断裂断层气地球化学变化特征及断层活动性[J].地震, 37(1):39-51.

    Google Scholar

    王喜龙, 李营, 杜建国, 陈志, 周晓成, 李新艳, 崔月菊, 王海燕, 张志宏. 2017.首都圈地区土壤气Rn, Hg, CO2地球化学特征及其成因[J].地震学报, 39(1):85-101.

    Google Scholar

    吴慧山, 白云山, 林玉飞, 常桂兰. 1997.氡迁移的接力传递作用[J].地球物理学报, 40(1):136-142.

    Google Scholar

    伍剑波, 张慧, 苏鹤军. 2014.断层气氡在不同类型覆盖层中迁移规律的数值模拟[J].地震学报, 36(1):118-128.

    Google Scholar

    徐锡伟, 郭婷婷, 刘少卓等, 于贵华, 陈桂华, 吴熙彦. 2016.活动断层避让相关问题的讨论[J].地震地质, 48(3):477-502.

    Google Scholar

    徐锡伟, 赵伯明, 马胜利等. 2011.活动断层地质灾害预测方法及应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 305.

    Google Scholar

    徐永昌, 沈平, 刘文慧, 陶明信. 1996.东部油气区天然气中幔源挥发分的地球化学-Ⅱ, 幔源挥发份中的氦、氩级碳化合物[J].中国科学(D辑), 26(2):187-192.

    Google Scholar

    阎贤臣, 张增, 王长岭. 1987.断层上覆土壤中气体成份特征[J].中国地震, 1987, 34(4):52-60.

    Google Scholar

    张慧, 苏鹤军, 李晨桦. 2013.合作市隐伏断层控制性地球化学探测场地试验[J], 地震工程学报[J], 35(3):618-624.

    Google Scholar

    张慧, 张新基, 苏鹤军, 刘旭宙. 2010.兰州市活动断层土壤气汞、氡地球化, 学特征场地试验[J].西北地震学报, 32(3):273-278.

    Google Scholar

    张培震, 邓起东, 张国民, 马瑾, 甘卫军, 闵伟, 毛凤英, 王琦. 2003.中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块[J].中国科学, 33(S):12-20.

    Google Scholar

    张炜, 罗光伟, 邢玉安, 魏家珍. 1988.气体地球化学方法在探索活断层中的应用[J].中国地震, 4(2):121-123.

    Google Scholar

    周晓成, 柴炽章, 雷启云, 司学芸, 王传远. 2013.银川隐伏断层带中H2的地球化学特征[J].物探与化探, 37(1):147-149.

    Google Scholar

    朱金芳, 黄宗林, 徐锡伟, 郑荣章, 方盛明, 白登海, 王广才, 闵伟, 闻学泽, 韩竹军. 2005.福州市活断层探测与地震危险性评价[J].中国地震, 21(1):1-16.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(6)

Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(2089) PDF downloads(282) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint