2017 Vol. 44, No. 3
Article Contents

WANG Lifeng, FU Shaoying, LIANG Jinqiang, SHANG Jiujing, WANG Jingli. 2017. A review on gas hydrate developments propped by worldwide national projects[J]. Geology in China, 44(3): 439-448. doi: 10.12029/gc20170303
Citation: WANG Lifeng, FU Shaoying, LIANG Jinqiang, SHANG Jiujing, WANG Jingli. 2017. A review on gas hydrate developments propped by worldwide national projects[J]. Geology in China, 44(3): 439-448. doi: 10.12029/gc20170303

A review on gas hydrate developments propped by worldwide national projects

    Fund Project: Supported by China Geological Survey Project (No. DD20160214, 121201002000150007)
More Information
  • Author Bio: WANG Lifeng, male, born in 1978, doctor, professor, engages in the thermobaric study of gas hydrate; E-mail: charles_wlf@163.com
  • With the consumption and decreasing of the worldwide resources of petroleum and natural gas, the exports from various countries are working hard to find a new kind of substitute energy. Undoubtedly, a new hope in the future is probably attributed to the resource of gas hydrate following its discovery, exploration, development and utilization. For the significant strategies and economic benefits of gas hydrate, many developed countries and developing countries, such as United States, Japan, India, South Korea, Germany, Norway and China, have arranged it under the key national projects and invested enormous capital on the marine surveys and exploitation tests. In this review, the authors concisely describe the histories and current situations of gas hydrate in the main countries, with the emphasis placed on the national projects with the exploration extents, development situations, national investments and strategic deployments for gas hydrate. The authors also discuss the current progresses with which experts are most concerned. The authors divide those countries into 3 types:(1) United States. It has accumulated huge geological data and material supported by research institutions and ODP explorations in the early stage, but recently it somewhat reduces the investments on surveys and exploitation tests mainly because of the commercial success of shale gas revolution. In spite of such a situation, it still has great interest in theories and techniques of gas hydrate mainly focusing on the comprehensive subjects, and waits the opportunity to venture again once the market opportunity is ready. (2) China, Japan, India, South Korea. Due to the limits of domestic energy structures and preserve capacities, they hold an extremely active position on the development of gas hydrate with huge national investments on marine drilling expeditions. In particular, China and Japan have gained a great momentum in the marine exploitation tests, quite possibly being the first nations with full commercial operations. (3) Germany, Norway. As the traditional European industrial countries, they focus on improving gas hydrate exploitation techniques, for instance, the technology of CO2-CH4 replacement, paying much attention on environmental assessment supported by their solid industrial technical groundwork. They are the representatives of Greenpeace in the subject of gas hydrate and maybe provide a new opportunity in the later energy times for gas hydrate development.

  • 加载中
  • Andreassen K, Berteussen K A, Sognnes H, Henneberg K, Langhammer J, Mienert J. 2003. Multicomponent ocean bottom cable data in gas hydrate investigation offshore of Norway[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(8):2399-2405.

    Google Scholar

    Biastoch A, Treude T, Rupke L H. 2011. Rising Arctic Ocean temperatures cause gas hydrate destabilization and ocean acidification[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 38:25-36.

    Google Scholar

    Collett T S. 2002. Energy resource potential of natural gas hydrates[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 86(11):1971 -1992.

    Google Scholar

    Davie M K, Zatsepina O Y, Buffett B A. 2004. Methane solubility in marine hydrate environments[J]. Marine Geology, 203:177-184. doi: 10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00331-1

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Eckert C, Jack D, Nur A M. 2000. Estimating of gas hydrate and free gas from marine seismic data[J]. Geophysics, 65(2):565-573. doi: 10.1190/1.1444752

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Giavarini C, Hester K. 2011. Gas hydrate:Immense Energy Potential and Environmental Challenges[M]. London:Springer Press, 30-56.

    Google Scholar

    He T, Spence G D, Riedel M, Hyndman R D, Chapman N R. 2007.Fluid flow and origin of a carbonate mound offshore Vancouver Island:Seismic and heat flow constraints[J]. Marine Geology, 239:83-98. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2007.01.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Hyndman R D, Spence G D. 1992. A seismic study of methane gas hydrate marine bottom simulating reflectors[J]. Journal Geophysical Research, 97(5):6683-6698.

    Google Scholar

    Kvenvolden K A. 1993. A primer in gas hydrates[C]//Howell D G(ed.).The future of energy gases. Washington:U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1570, 279-292.

    Google Scholar

    Lee M W, Collett T S. 2008. Integrated analysis of well logs and seismic data at the Keathley Canyon, Gulf of Mexico, for estimation of gas hydrate concentrations[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 25:924-931. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.09.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    MacDonald G T. 1990. The future of methane as an energy resource[J]. Annual Review of Energy, 15:53-83. doi: 10.1146/annurev.eg.15.110190.000413

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Matsumoto R, Tomaru H, Lu H. 2004. Detection and evaluation of gas hydrates in the eastern Nankai Trough by geochemical and geophysical methods[J]. Resource Geology, 54(1):53-67. doi: 10.1111/rge.2004.54.issue-1

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Milkov A V, Sassen R. 2003. Preliminary assessment of resources and economic potential of individual gas hydrate accumulations in the Gulf of Mexico continental slope[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 20:111-128. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8172(03)00024-2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Novosel I, Spence G D, Hyndman R D. 2005. Reduced magnetization produced by increased methane flux at a gas hydrate vent[J]. Marine Geology, 216:265-274. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2005.02.027

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Ruppel C, Dickens G R, Castellini D G, Gilhooly W, Lizarralde D. 2005. Heat and salt inhibition of gas hydrate formation in the northern Gulf of Mexico[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 32:1-4.

    Google Scholar

    Shankar U, Riedel M. 2011. Gas hydrate saturation in the Krishna-Godavari basin from P-wave velocity and electrical resistivity logs[J]. Marine Petroleum Geology, 28(10):1768-1778. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.09.008

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Sloan E D, Koh C A. 2008. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases(third edition)[M]. New York:CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, 15-42.

    Google Scholar

    Talukder A R, Bialas J, Klaeschen D. 2007. High-resolution, deep tow, multichannel seismic and sidescan sonar survey of the submarine mounds and associated BSR off Nicaragua pacific margin[J]. Marine Geology, 241:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2007.03.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Trehu A M. 2004. Three-dimensional distribution of gas hydrate beneath southern Hydrate Ridge:Constraints from ODP Leg 204[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 222:845-862. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.03.035

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Tsuji Y, Ishida H, Nakamizu M, Matsumoto R, Shimizu S. 2004.Overview of the METI Nankai Trough wells:A milestone in the evaluation of methane hydrate resources[J]. Resource Geology, 54(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/rge.2004.54.issue-1

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Waseda A. 1998. Organic carbon content, bacterial methanogenesis, and accumulation processes of gas hydrates in marine sediments[J]. Geochemical Journal, 32:143-157. doi: 10.2343/geochemj.32.143

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Wilson A, Ruppel C. 2007. Salt tectonics and shallow subsea floor fluid convection:Models of coupled fluid-heat-salt transport[J]. Geofluids, 7(4):377-386. doi: 10.1111/gfl.2009.7.issue-4

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Winters W, Walker M, Hunter R. 2011. Physical properties of sediment from the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope[J]. Marine Petroleum Geology, 28(10):361-380.

    Google Scholar

    Xu H, Dai J, Snyder F, Dutta N. 2004. Seismic detection and quantification of gas hydrates using rock physics and inversion[C]//C E Taylor and J T Kwan (ed.). Advances in the study of gas hydrates. New York:Kluwer, 117-139.

    Google Scholar

    Yuan J, Edwards R N. 2000. Towed sea floor electromagnetics and assessment of gas hydrate deposits[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 27:2397-2400. doi: 10.1029/2000GL011585

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Yun T S, Lee J S, Bahk J J, Santamarina J C. 2011. Geotechnical characterization of marine sediments in the Ulleung Basin, East Sea[J]. Eng. Geol., 117(2):151-158.

    Google Scholar

    Yun T S, Narsilio G A, Santamarina J C. 2006. Physical characterization of core samples recovered from Gulf of Mexico[J]. Marine Petroleum Geology, 23(2):893-900.

    Google Scholar

    Zhang G X, Liang J Q, Lu J A. Geological features, controlling factors and potential prospects of the gas hydrate occurrence in the northeastern part of South China Sea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 67:356-367.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(1)

Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(3033) PDF downloads(1447) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint